POC详情: 44f37d11a3fb854536e1d217ce4d5b37fe58d3da

来源
关联漏洞
标题: Google Chrome 安全漏洞 (CVE-2025-10585)
描述:Google Chrome是美国谷歌(Google)公司的一款Web浏览器。 Google Chrome存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于V8中类型混淆。
描述
Google patched CVE-2025-10585, a Chrome V8 zero-day under active exploitation — here’s what it is, why it matters, and how to stay safe.
介绍
# CVE-2025-10585: The Chrome V8 Zero-Day You Need to Patch Today ⚔️🛡️

Google has released an out-of-band patch this week for **CVE-2025-10585**, a serious *type-confusion* vulnerability in Chrome’s V8 JavaScript / WebAssembly engine. The bug is not theoretical — Google’s Threat Analysis Group confirmed **active exploitation in the wild**, which makes this a high-urgency update for everyone using Chrome or other Chromium-based browsers. If your install is behind, update now. ⏳🔧

![Cover](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f94fb07b-244e-4532-aaf2-2f9f3b2454f6) <br/>

---

## Why This Matters 🌐

Browsers are the most exposed software on most endpoints. They parse untrusted content from every corner of the web — ads, iframes, scripts, user uploads — and V8 is the engine that executes that content in Chrome. A reliable remote code execution (RCE) in V8 lets an attacker turn a single crafted webpage, ad, or compromised third-party script into a delivery mechanism for malware. That’s why V8 bugs get immediate attention, fast patches, and — when exploited — rapid incident responses. 🚨

---

## What the vulnerability is 🔍

At a high level, **CVE-2025-10585** is a *type-confusion* bug. Type-confusion means the JavaScript engine incorrectly treats one kind of internal object as another. In a strongly typed engine that tracks object shapes and types, mixing up those expectations can cause memory to be read or written incorrectly. The end result is heap corruption — which attackers can turn into powerful primitives like **arbitrary read** and **arbitrary write**. From there, the usual escalation ladder leads to code execution. ⚠️

Importantly: Google has confirmed this was seen in real-world attacks, which implies attackers had a working chain that went from a delivered webpage to reliable execution on victim machines. 🕵️‍♂️

---

## Description of the exploit chain 🧭

I won’t publish PoC code or step-by-step exploit recipes. But for a technically literate audience, here’s the safe, conceptual breakdown of what a typical V8 type-confusion exploit looks like and why it’s so potent:

<img width="2610" height="2342" alt="Flow" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a73e2559-b262-4c0f-8df5-cb97adf91138" /> <br/>

1. **Trigger the type confusion.** The attacker crafts JavaScript (or WebAssembly) that executes a sequence of operations the engine fails to validate properly. That sequence forces the engine to treat memory that holds one object type as if it were a different type. 🎯
2. **Heap corruption → primitives.** The type confusion is manipulated until it yields an **arbitrary read** or **arbitrary write** primitive. Arbitrary read allows an attacker to leak memory contents (useful for bypassing ASLR); arbitrary write permits controlled modification of memory. Together, these are the core building blocks for further exploitation. 🧱
3. **Turn primitives into executable code.** With read/write, attackers locate JIT-compiled code pages or create a RWX region (often via WebAssembly) and write shellcode or a ROP chain. Modern mitigations make this noisy, so attackers frequently use creative JIT spraying, wasm-based codegen, or ROP techniques instead of naive shellcode. 🧨
4. **Escape sandbox / achieve persistence.** Chrome’s renderer processes run in sandboxes. To get to the OS level, attackers need a second bug (a sandbox escape) or a follow-on exploit in a lower-level component. In active campaigns, attackers commonly chain the V8 RCE with a separate bug to pop the sandbox and run native payloads. 🔓
5. **Follow-on actions.** Once native execution is achieved, payloads can install persistence, exfiltrate data, or drop backdoors — especially devastating for targeted or high-value victims. 📡

That sequence explains why a single V8 RCE is a very high-value exploit: it can convert everyday browsing into a full compromise.

---

## My personal peek: version check 📸🗿

While drafting this, I checked my own Chrome — it was at **140.0.7339.128** (screenshot attached by me while writing). That build is older than the patched Stable releases; updating to the fixed build resolved it for me. If your version is lower than the patched builds, you’re exposed — update now. 🔁

<img width="1917" height="1079" alt="MyVersion" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2540b0b8-0246-45a1-901d-cec199fe9d76" /> <br/>

---

## Which builds are patched ✅

Google rolled the fix into the Stable channel; patched builds include:

* **Windows & macOS:** `140.0.7339.185` / `140.0.7339.186`
* **Linux:** `140.0.7339.185`

If your Chrome shows a build number lower than those, update immediately. Note that other Chromium forks (Edge, Brave, Vivaldi, Opera) inherit V8 and will need their vendor patches — check each vendor’s advisory. 📣

---

## Practical actions for individuals & teams 🛠️

* **Update Chrome now:** Menu → Help → About Google Chrome → allow it to update → restart. 🔄
* **Patch other Chromium-based browsers** used in your environment. 🧩
* **Enable automatic updates** and verify your patch management pushes updates promptly. ⚙️
* **Harden browsing for high-risk users:** use script blockers, separate profiles/VMs for risky browsing, or a dedicated browsing appliance. 🧰
* **EDR / detection:** ensure endpoint detection is current and run focused hunts for suspicious post-exploit behavior (new persistence mechanisms, suspicious native processes, network beacons). 🔎
* **Educate users:** remind them not to follow unknown links and to report unexpected download prompts. 📢

---

## Why vendors withhold details early 🤐

Google and other vendors often limit technical details at first because public PoCs accelerate mass exploitation. The vendor wants a majority of users patched before giving researchers a full technical recipe. That balance is why you’ll often see a short advisory and a patch first, followed later by detailed write-ups or patch diffs researchers can responsibly analyze. ⚖️

---

## The broader landscape 🌍

CVE-2025-10585 is another reminder of two structural truths of modern security: 
1) Browsers are a favorite target for attackers because of reach.
2) The attack surface for JavaScript engines is large and constantly evolving.

This zero-day is at least the **sixth Chrome zero-day** this year, showing both how critical the V8 attack surface is and how creative attackers continue to be. 📈

---

## Responsible disclosure & research ethics 🤝

If you’re an independent researcher and you find a PoC or a potential exploit variant, prioritize coordinated disclosure. Report to Google TAG / Chromium security and avoid public release while active exploitation is happening. Publishing exploit code during active exploitation amplifies harm and undermines protective efforts. 🧾

---

## Final Words — Keep it Tight 🗝️

CVE-2025-10585 isn’t just a line in a vulnerability tracker. It’s an example of how quickly a bug can move from discovery to weaponization when the stakes are high. The fix exists — the immediate task is simple: confirm your builds and update. Beyond that, adopt patch discipline, harden browsing for at-risk users, and keep your detection controls tuned. 🛡️

Stay patched, stay safe. 🗿

~ **Aditya Bhatt**

---
文件快照

[4.0K] /data/pocs/44f37d11a3fb854536e1d217ce4d5b37fe58d3da ├── [1.0K] LICENSE └── [7.2K] README.md 0 directories, 2 files
神龙机器人已为您缓存
备注
    1. 建议优先通过来源进行访问。
    2. 如果因为来源失效或无法访问,请发送邮箱到 f.jinxu#gmail.com 索取本地快照(把 # 换成 @)。
    3. 神龙已为您对POC代码进行快照,为了长期维护,请考虑为本地POC付费,感谢您的支持。