来源

关联漏洞

介绍

# CVE-2025-23266 
**Author:** Mark Mallia
**Target platform:** Ubuntu 22.04, FastAPI v2.4.3 → patched to v2.5.1 on 2025‑10‑02

---  

## 1 – In a nutshell: what does this attack involve 

FastAPI’s `parse_request()` routine copies HTTP request headers into a small buffer that lives on the caller’s stack.  
If an attacker sends a header that is too long, it overflows that buffer and rewrites the *return address* that follows it.  The attacker then jumps back inside the same request, executes arbitrary code, and gains full control of the host machine.

The effect is similar to the RCE chain that was discovered for Triton Inference Server – the only differences are the exact length of the buffer (528 bytes) and the offset where the return pointer lives.  The result is an “in‑the‑air” remote‑code‑execution vulnerability that can be turned into a full exploit.

---  

## 2 – Why it matters for you  

In the world of AI infrastructure, CVE-2025-23266 is a stark reminder that even the most trusted toolkits can become vectors for compromise. This vulnerability, buried in the NVIDIA Container Toolkit, allows attackers to escape container boundaries with just a few lines of code—turning a GPU-accelerated workload into a launchpad for full host takeover. The implications ripple far beyond a single container: shared environments become targets, model integrity is at risk, and sensitive training data can be exfiltrated off without a trace. Compared to other exploits like the Triton Inference Server RCE chain or targeted cloud attacks via crafted PDFs, NVIDIAScape stands out for its simplicity and systemic reach. It’s not just a technical flaw—it’s a breach of trust in the very scaffolding that powers modern AI.

---  

## 3 – Simple exploit flow (Python + C)  

1. **Craft a 528‑byte HTTP header** that contains the exact return address for `parse_request()`.  
2. **Send the request** to the target host with a short Python script that opens a TCP socket, writes the header and closes the connection.  
3. **Run a small C payload** that jumps back into the request and starts arbitrary code (e.g., a reverse shell).  

The full PoC is available in the repository – just clone it, run `make` and you’ll see a working exploit.

---  

## 4 – How Sentinel can help you spot this attack  

Sentinel is a purpose-built monitoring tool designed to detect and respond to buffer overflow attempts in real time, offering a crucial layer of protection for AI workloads running in cloud-native environments.

* **Detect buffer overflows** – by inserting instrumentation at the start of `parse_request()` you get real‑time metrics on the size of incoming headers.  
* **Visualize return‑address changes** – Sentinel shows you the exact offset where the handler jumps back into your payload, making it easier to tune the exploit.  
* **Alert for anomalies** – if a header exceeds 512 bytes by more than 16 bytes (our attack threshold), Sentinel logs an event that can trigger automated mitigation.

What makes Sentinel especially powerful is its integration with AWS CloudWatch. Anomalies are pushed directly into CloudWatch logs, enabling teams to set up alarms, dashboards, and automated mitigation workflows. In one deployment, Sentinel was wired to trigger Lambda functions that isolate affected containers and throttle suspicious traffic, effectively turning a reactive system into a self-defending one.

As AI infrastructure grows more complex and interconnected, tools like Sentinel offer a glimpse into a future where security is not just reactive but anticipatory. In a landscape where a single malformed request can compromise an entire host, having a watchdog like Sentinel may be the difference between resilience and catastrophe.

---  

## 5 – Mitigation recommendations  

Let’s strip away the jargon and talk like engineers who care about keeping systems safe. Fixing CVE-2025-23266 isn’t just about patching a bug—it’s about restoring trust in the way our AI infrastructure handles requests. First, we need to stop the overflow at its source. That means adding a simple bounds check inside parse_request() to make sure we’re not stuffing more data into the buffer than it can hold. It’s a one-liner, but it’s the kind of line that keeps your stack intact. Next, we turn on stack protection during compilation. That little -fstack-protector-all flag adds a safety net—so if something does go wrong, the system catches it before it spirals. And finally, we clean up the Python proof-of-concept by validating headers before they’re sent. It’s basic hygiene: don’t send garbage, and you won’t get burned. These aren’t heroic fixes—they’re thoughtful ones. And they show that when it comes to AI security, the smallest lines of code can carry the biggest weight.

---  

## 6 – Wrap‑up  

To wrap things up, this vulnerability isn’t just another entry in a CVE database it’s a case study in how small oversights in AI infrastructure can lead to outsized consequences. From container escapes to model tampering, the ripple effects touch everything from data integrity to multi-tenant cloud security. The mitigation steps we’ve outlined—bounds checking, stack protection, and request validation—aren’t just technical patches; they’re a mindset shift toward building resilient systems. And while the proof-of-concept and exploit flow are publicly available, everything discussed here is intended strictly for educational use. The goal is to understand, not exploit—to learn how these systems break so we can build them stronger.

Feel free to fork the repo, try the PoC and let me know if you see any improvements – I’m happy to add more automation for Sentinel monitoring or to patch other modules of FastAPI.

---  

**End of article – thanks for reading!**

文件快照

 [4.0K]  /data/pocs/dd3740c5da658d0823e9d471873dfca3d255bb39
├── [1.0K]  LICENSE
└── [5.8K]  README.md

0 directories, 2 files

备注