Question 1

What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

Accepted Answer

🚨 **Essence**: OpenProject SQL Injection (CWE-89). Custom field names aren't sanitized in SQL queries.…

Question 2

Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

Accepted Answer

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **CWE-89** (SQL Injection). The flaw lies in **improper cleaning** of custom field names before inserting them into SQL queries.…

Question 3

Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

Accepted Answer

👥 **Affected Versions**:
• OpenProject **16.6.9** and earlier
• OpenProject **17.0.6** and earlier
• OpenProject **17.1.3** and earlier
• OpenProject **17.2.1** and earlier 📦 Vendor: **opf** (OpenProject …

Question 4

What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

Accepted Answer

💀 **Attacker Capabilities**:
1. **SQL Injection**: Manipulate database queries.
2. **Remote Code Execution (RCE)**: Inject **Ruby code** via Git operations.
3.…

Question 5

Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

Accepted Answer

🔐 **Exploitation Threshold**: **Medium**.
• **Network**: Remote (AV:N)
• **Complexity**: Low (AC:L)
• **Privileges**: **Required** (PR:H) - Attacker needs authenticated access.…

Question 6

Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

Accepted Answer

🧪 **Public Exploit**: **No** public PoC/Exploit listed in the data (POCs: []). However, the severity (CVSS 9.8) and clear attack path (SQL -> Git -> RCE) make it highly attractive for future exploitation.…

Question 7

How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

Accepted Answer

🔍 **Self-Check**:
1. Verify OpenProject version against the **affected list** above.
2. Scan for **SQL injection** patterns in custom field inputs.
3.…

Question 8

Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

Accepted Answer

✅ **Official Fix**: **Yes**. The advisory (GHSA-jqhf-rf9x-9rhx) implies fixed versions exist:
• 16.6.10+
• 17.0.7+
• 17.1.4+
• 17.2.2+ 🔄 **Action**: Upgrade immediately to the latest patched version.

Question 9

What if no patch? (Workaround)

Accepted Answer

🚧 **Workaround (If No Patch)**:
1. **Restrict Access**: Limit authentication to trusted IPs/users only.
2. **Input Sanitization**: Manually validate/custom field name inputs if possible (hard for web apps).…

Question 10

Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

Accepted Answer

🔥 **Urgency**: **CRITICAL (P1)**.
• CVSS Score: **9.8** (Critical).
• Impact: **RCE** via SQLi.
• Auth Required: Yes, but common in enterprise apps. 🚀 **Recommendation**: Patch **immediately**. Do not wait.

Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

CVE-2026-32698 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

Continue exploring