Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4275

4275 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
Confidentiality Read Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and Design Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-106491 Backstage: Improper input validation in proxy-backend — backstage 6.4 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106443 WeasyPrint: EPS images reach the Ghostscript interpreter resulting in RCE — WeasyPrint 8.8 High 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106331 Google Chrome <155.0.8059.39 扩展程序输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106299 Chrome <155.0.8059.39 输入验证绕过漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106353 iOS版Chrome < 155.0.8059.39输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106263 Chrome<155.0.8059.39扩展程序输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106226 Google Chrome<155.0.8059.39地址栏欺骗漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106206 Chrome iOS <155.0.8059.39 输入验证错误导致信息泄露 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106414 Chrome Mobile iOS <155.0.8059.39 输入验证不当漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106185 Chrome Viz输入验证错误允许绕过系统访问限制 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106396 Chrome Android<155.0.8059.39 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-34498 L4L — Illustra Standard - L4L China 5.1 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-56596 HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities. — HCL BigFix Service Management 3.5 Low 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-105757 vLLM: Structured-output request errors escape the request boundary and terminate the shared EngineCore — engine-fatal denial of service (3 sites) — vllm 6.5 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105756 vLLM: Loose `cache_salt` validation lets a single request kill EngineCore on LMCache-MP deployments — uncaught downstream `ValueError` denial of service — vllm 6.5 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105754 vLLM: Scale-out disaggregated multimodal transport trusts caller-supplied features — vllm 6.5 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-101919 Hypershift: hypershift: unsanitized kubeconfig passthrough from tenant namespace to control plane — Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes 8.8 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105117 OpenAM before 16.1.3 Email Content Injection via Users REST Self-Service Actions — OpenAM 6.1 Medium 2026-10-03
CVE-2026-63569 MTI/A0 DHAgreement does not validate the peer's ephemeral value — bc-csharp 9.1 Critical 2026-10-02
CVE-2026-55094 Taskcluster: Unauthenticated remote code execution in `web-server` via GraphQL `filter` argument (sift `$where`) — taskcluster 8.7 High 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-47547 NVIDIA驱动固件输入验证漏洞致代码执行 — GeForce 6.7 Medium 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-47546 NVIDIA驱动固件输入验证漏洞致代码执行 — GeForce 6.7 Medium 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-47543 NVIDIA显卡驱动内核输入验证漏洞致代码执行 — GeForce 6.7 Medium 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-47542 NVIDIA驱动内核层输入验证不当致代码执行漏洞 — GeForce 6.7 Medium 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-47522 NVIDIA驱动内核层输入验证不当致代码执行漏洞 — GeForce 6.7 Medium 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-85532 Apache WSS4J: Insufficient Validation of Derived-Key Parameters — Apache WSS4J - - 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-93995 Apache MINA SSHD: Remote execution of JGit "archive -o=file.zip" can write file on the server — Apache MINA SSHD 6.5 Medium 2026-09-30
CVE-2026-102823 russh: Client-side channel-scoped Handler callbacks fire for channel IDs the client never opened — russh 7.5 High 2026-09-29
CVE-2026-102677 Electron: Sandboxed preload code cache can be poisoned by a compromised renderer — electron 7.8 High 2026-09-29
CVE-2026-95364 Chrome 154.0.8037.57前UI欺骗漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-29

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 4275 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.