Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1020 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 3362

3362 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
ConfidentialityRead Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityModify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignConsider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and DesignUse an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-5946 Invalid handling of CLASS != IN — BIND 9 7.5 High2026-05-20
CVE-2026-31378 Apache OFBiz: JSON Attribute Override and URL Allowlist Bypass Leads to Remote Code Execution — Apache OFBiz--2026-05-19
CVE-2026-28751 filemanagement_storage_service has an improper input validation vulnerability — OpenHarmony 3.3 Low2026-05-19
CVE-2026-27891 Remote Code Execution (RCE) via Zip Slip in Plugin Upload Mechanism — facturascripts 7.2 High2026-05-18
CVE-2026-45492 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 5.4 Medium2026-05-18
CVE-2026-45317 Open WebUI: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via Image URL Manipulation — open-webui 4.6 Medium2026-05-15
CVE-2025-29936 AMD多款产品 输入验证错误漏洞 — AMD Ryzen™ 7035 Series Processors with Radeon™ Graphics (formerly codenamed "Rembrandt R")--2026-05-15
CVE-2026-42327 rust-openssl: undefined behavior in X509Ref::ocsp_responders for certificates with non-UTF-8 OCSP URLs — rust-openssl--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8579 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8538 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8536 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8528 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8527 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-8516 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-26062 Fleet server may terminate unexpectedly when handling certain gRPC requests — fleet--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-44522 Note Mark: Arbitrary File Write via Path Traversal in Asset Names Leading to Remote Code Execution — note-mark--2026-05-14
CVE-2026-20224 Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager XML External Entity Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager 8.6 High2026-05-14
CVE-2026-44482 soundcloud-rpc: Remote Code Execution via XSS in Track Title — soundcloud-rpc 9.6 Critical2026-05-14
CVE-2026-44425 ShellHub: Crash-DoS via field injection in filter and sort-by parameters — shellhub 5.4 Medium2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44379 MISP: Improper UUID validation in MISP Collections — MISP--2026-05-13
CVE-2026-45055 CubeCart: Pre-Authenticated Password Reset Link Poisoning via HTTP Host Header — v6 8.1 High2026-05-13
CVE-2026-0238 Broker VM: Improper Input Validation in Broker VM Certificate and Key Fields — Broker VM--2026-05-13
CVE-2026-42579 Netty: DNS Codec Input Validation Bypass in Netty (Encoder + Decoder) — netty 7.5 High2026-05-13
CVE-2026-2695 Lack of Server-side validation in Instruction Input in TeamViewer DEX Platform (On-Premises) — DEX (On-Premises) 6.3 Medium2026-05-13
CVE-2026-44294 protobufjs: Denial of service from crafted field names in generated code — protobuf.js 5.3 Medium2026-05-13
CVE-2026-8369 Improper Input Validation in OpenThread NAT64 Translator — OpenThread--2026-05-13
CVE-2026-42544 Granian: Unauthenticated DoS via WebSocket subprotocol header panic — granian 7.5 High2026-05-12
CVE-2026-34669 CAI Content Credentials | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) — CAI Content Credentials 6.2 Medium2026-05-12
CVE-2026-34688 CAI Content Credentials | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) — CAI Content Credentials 6.2 Medium2026-05-12
CVE-2026-34668 CAI Content Credentials | Improper Input Validation (CWE-20) — CAI Content Credentials 6.2 Medium2026-05-12

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 3362 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.