Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) — Vulnerability Class 2041

2041 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-639 represents an authorization bypass weakness where systems fail to validate that a user is permitted to access a resource identified by a user-controlled key. Attackers typically exploit this by manipulating identifiers, such as changing a numeric user ID in a URL or API parameter, to retrieve or modify another user’s private data. This insecure direct object reference allows unauthorized access without requiring authentication bypasses. Developers prevent this vulnerability by implementing robust server-side authorization checks that verify the requesting user’s permissions against the requested resource, rather than trusting client-supplied identifiers. Additionally, using indirect references or opaque tokens instead of predictable, sequential keys can mitigate the risk of enumeration and unauthorized access attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Retrieval of a user record occurs in the system based on some key value that is under user control. The key would typically identify a user-related record stored in the system and would be used to lookup that record for presentation to the user. It is likely that an attacker would have to be an authenticated user in the system. However, the authorization process would not properly check the data access operation to ensure that the authenticated user performing the operation has sufficient entitlements to perform the requested data access, hence bypassing any other authorization checks present in the system. For example, attackers can look at places where user specific data is retrieved (e.g. search screens) and determine whether the key for the item being looked up is controllable externally. The key may be a hidden field in the HTML form field, might be passed as a URL parameter or as an unencrypted cookie variable, then in each of these cases it will be possible to tamper with the key value. One manifestation of this weakness is when a system uses sequential or otherwise easily-guessable session IDs that would allow one user to easily switch to another user's session and read/modify their data.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
Access control checks for specific user data or functionality can be bypassed.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Horizontal escalation of privilege is possible (one user can view/modify information of another user).
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Vertical escalation of privilege is possible if the user-controlled key is actually a flag that indicates administrator status, allowing the attacker to gain administrative access.
Mitigations (3)
Architecture and Design For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design, Implementation Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
Examples (1)
The following code uses a parameterized statement, which escapes metacharacters and prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities, to construct and execute a SQL query that searches for an invoice matching the specified identifier [1]. The identifier is selected from a list of all invoices associated with the current authenticated user.
... conn = new SqlConnection(_ConnectionString); conn.Open(); int16 id = System.Convert.ToInt16(invoiceID.Text); SqlCommand query = new SqlCommand( "SELECT * FROM invoices WHERE id = @id", conn); query.Parameters.AddWithValue("@id", id); SqlDataReader objReader = objCommand.ExecuteReader(); ...
Bad · C#
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-69258 Flowise: Unauthenticated Property Injection into Flow Execution Context via Ungated `overrideConfig` Spread in Prediction API — Flowise 8.8 High 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69250 Flowise: Unauthenticated OAuth2 Refresh Enables Non-Blind SSRF and Secret Exfiltration — Flowise 8.5 High 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-18722 diaowen DWSurvey dev-survey.do in DwDeisgnSurveyController.devSurvey. authorization — DWSurvey 6.3 Medium 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-46712 Misskey: Lack of proper permission checks in Direct Messaging feature — misskey 2.3 Low 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-18631 jeequan jeepay PreAuthorize SysLogController.java WebSecurityConfig authorization — jeepay 6.3 Medium 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-69094 Admidio before 5.0.11 IDOR via save_temporary mylist_function.php — admidio 4.3 Medium 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-2346 IDOR in Menulux Software's Mobile App — Mobile App 9.8 Critical 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-68582 Vikunja 0.24.0 Broken Object Level Authorization via Link-Share Token — vikunja 6.5 Medium 2026-08-02
CVE-2025-71400 better-auth passkey before 1.4.0 IDOR via delete-passkey — passkey 7.1 High 2026-08-02
CVE-2026-67331 better-auth SCIM 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 Authorization Bypass — scim 8.3 High 2026-08-01
CVE-2026-67329 @better-auth/stripe before 1.6.21 Authorization Bypass via Organization Subscription — stripe 7.1 High 2026-08-01
CVE-2026-67342 ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 Authorization Bypass via Database Handlers — arcadedb 9.8 Critical 2026-08-01
CVE-2025-14073 WooCommerce PayPal Payments <= 3.3.2 - Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Disclosure — WooCommerce PayPal Payments 5.3 Medium 2026-08-01
CVE-2026-45330 Decidim: Verification admins can access supplied IDs from other organisations — decidim 4.9 Medium 2026-07-31
CVE-2026-65981 Coturn: MOBILITY-TICKET session-resume authorization bypass allows cross-user TURN allocation takeover — coturn 7.1 High 2026-07-31
CVE-2026-17349 pgAdmin 4: Adhoc server clone leaks another user's stored database credentials and ownership to a non-owner — pgAdmin 4 9.6 Critical 2026-07-31
CVE-2026-17567 Fluent Forms <= 6.2.8 - Unauthenticated Sensitive Information Exposure via Insecure Direct Object Reference and Weak Transaction Hash in 'transaction' Parameter — Fluent Forms – Customizable Contact Forms, Survey, Quiz, & Conversational Form Builder 5.3 Medium 2026-07-31
CVE-2026-16105 Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: missing per-role authorization on rolecontainerresource composite endpoints — Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6 4.9 Medium 2026-07-31
CVE-2026-68501 Sylius Mollie Plugin: Unauthenticated IDOR leaks order token and customer PII — MolliePlugin 6.5 Medium 2026-07-30
CVE-2026-68500 Sylius Mollie Plugin: Payment status forgery via the payment webhook — MolliePlugin 7.5 High 2026-07-30
CVE-2026-10700 Broken Access Control Vulnerabilities in Langflow 1.0.0 - 1.8.4 File Handling API Allowed Unauthorized Access to User Files — Langflow OSS 6.5 Medium 2026-07-30
CVE-2026-12945 Langflow is affected by exposed credentials due to multiple unauthenticated and insufficiently authorized API endpoints — Langflow OSS 7.1 High 2026-07-30
CVE-2026-67348 Julep Insecure Direct Object Reference via GET /executions/{execution_id} — julep 8.1 High 2026-07-30
CVE-2026-5060 MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin – for Online Courses and Education <= 3.7.14 - Insecure Direct Object Reference to Authenticated (Instructor+) Arbitrary Attachment Deletion — MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin – for Online Courses and Education 6.5 Medium 2026-07-29
CVE-2026-57510 SuperPlane < 0.27.0 Broken Object Level Authorization via CanvasService gRPC — superplane 8.8 High 2026-07-28
CVE-2026-49258 Nebula Mesh: Web UI lacks ownership checks, enabling cross-operator access to hosts and networks (read, block, delete) — nebula-mesh 8.8 High 2026-07-28
CVE-2026-18028 Missing authorization check in event quick setup view — pretix 2.3 Low 2026-07-28
CVE-2026-16797 ShopLentor <= 3.4.5 - Insecure Direct Object Reference to Authenticated (Contributor+) Sensitive Information Exposure via 'optionSection' Parameter — ShopLentor – All-in-One WooCommerce Growth & Store Enhancement Plugin 4.3 Medium 2026-07-28
CVE-2026-59240 IDOR in Prospero Flow CRM allows deletion of other users' notifications — Prospero Flow CRM 6.9 Medium 2026-07-27
CVE-2026-48052 Papra: Cross-organization tag deletion and modification via authenticated cross-tenant request — papra 5.4 Medium 2026-07-27

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) represent 2041 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.