Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1472

1472 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Implementation If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Operation Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System Configuration Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-4210 D-Link DNS-1550-04 time_machine.cgi cgi_tm_set_share command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4209 D-Link DNS-1550-04 account_mgr.cgi cgi_chg_admin_pw command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4207 D-Link DNS-1550-04 system_mgr.cgi cgi_ntp_time command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4206 D-Link DNS-1550-04 dsk_mgr.cgi ScanDisk_run_e2fsck command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4205 D-Link DNS-1550-04 app_mgr.cgi FTP_Server_BlockIP_Del command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4204 D-Link DNS-1550-04 gui_mgr.cgi cgi_mycloud_auto_downlaod command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4203 D-Link DNS-1550-04 network_mgr.cgi cgi_dhcpd command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4199 bazinga012 mcp_code_executor index.ts installDependencies command injection — mcp_code_executor 5.3 Medium 2026-03-16
CVE-2026-4198 hypermodel-labs mcp-server-auto-commit index.ts getGitChanges command injection — mcp-server-auto-commit 5.3 Medium 2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4197 D-Link DNS-1550-04 download_mgr.cgi RSS_Item_List command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4196 D-Link DNS-1550-04 remote_backup.cgi cgi_set_rsync_server command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4195 D-Link DNS-1550-04 wizard_mgr.cgi command injection — DNS-120 6.3 Medium 2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4192 AvinashBole quip-mcp-server index.ts setupToolHandlers command injection — quip-mcp-server 6.3 Medium 2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4164 Wavlink WL-WN578W2 POST Request wireless.cgi GuestWifi command injection — WL-WN578W2 9.8 Critical 2026-03-15
CVE-2026-4163 Wavlink WL-WN579A3 POST Request wireless.cgi GuestWifi command injection — WL-WN579A3 9.8 Critical 2026-03-14
CVE-2026-26133 M365 Copilot Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Copilot for Android 7.1 High 2026-03-13
CVE-2026-20163 Remote Command Execution (RCE) through the '/splunkd/__upload/indexing/preview' REST endpoint in Splunk Enterprise — Splunk Enterprise 8.0 High 2026-03-11
CVE-2026-32063 OpenClaw 2026.2.19-2 < 2026.2.21 - Command Injection via Newline in systemd Unit Generation — openclaw 7.1 High 2026-03-11
CVE-2026-3943 H3C ACG1000-AK230 aaa_portal_auth_local_submit command injection — ACG1000-AK230 7.3 High 2026-03-11
CVE-2026-3854 Remote code execution via git push option injection in GitHub Enterprise Server — Enterprise Server 8.8AI High AI 2026-03-10
CVE-2026-3798 Comfast CF-AC100 Request Path mbox-config sub_44AC14 command injection — CF-AC100 4.7 Medium 2026-03-09
CVE-2026-3704 Wavlink NU516U1 Incomplete Fix CVE-2025-10959 firewall.cgi sub_405B2C command injection — NU516U1 4.7 Medium 2026-03-08
CVE-2026-3680 RyuzakiShinji biome-mcp-server biome-mcp-server.ts command injection — biome-mcp-server 6.3 Medium 2026-03-07
CVE-2026-3662 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 adm.cgi usb_p910 command injection — WL-NU516U1 4.7 Medium 2026-03-07
CVE-2026-3661 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 adm.cgi ota_new_upgrade command injection — WL-NU516U1 4.7 Medium 2026-03-07
CVE-2026-3612 Wavlink WL-NU516U1 OTA Online Upgrade adm.cgi sub_405AF4 command injection — WL-NU516U1 7.2 High 2026-03-06
CVE-2026-3484 PhialsBasement nmap-mcp-server Nmap CLI index.ts child_process.exec command injection — nmap-mcp-server 6.3 Medium 2026-03-03
CVE-2025-33181 IBM MQ 安全漏洞 — Cumulus Linux GA 7.3 High 2026-02-24
CVE-2025-33180 NVIDIA Cumulus Linux和NVIDIA NVOS 命令注入漏洞 — Cumulus Linux GA 8.0 High 2026-02-24
CVE-2026-3066 HummerRisk Cloud Compliance Scanning PlatformUtils.java fixedCommand command injection — HummerRisk 6.3 Medium 2026-02-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1472 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.