Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23846

23846 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-23609 GFI MailEssentials AI < 22.4 General Settings Perimeter SMTP Servers Description Stored XSS — MailEssentials AI 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2026-23608 GFI MailEssentials AI < 22.4 Email Management Mail Monitoring Rule Stored XSS — MailEssentials AI 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2026-23607 GFI MailEssentials AI < 22.4 Anti-Spam Whitelist Description Stored XSS — MailEssentials AI 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2026-23606 GFI MailEssentials AI < 22.4 Advanced Content Filtering Rule Stored XSS — MailEssentials AI 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2026-23605 GFI MailEssentials AI < 22.4 Attachment Filtering Rule Stored XSS — MailEssentials AI 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2026-23604 GFI MailEssentials AI < 22.4 Keyword Filtering Rule Stored XSS — MailEssentials AI 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2026-25739 Indico affected by Cross-Site-Scripting via material uploads — indico 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2025-71241 SPIP < 4.3.6 Cross-Site Scripting in Private Area — SPIP 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2025-71240 SPIP < 4.2.15 Cross-Site Scripting via Code Tags — SPIP 5.4 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25430 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via vpn_users — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25429 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via openvpn_advanced — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25428 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via openvpn_users — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25427 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via antispyware — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25425 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via smtpconfig — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25426 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via dnsmasq — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25424 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via https_exceptions — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25423 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via proxyconfig — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25422 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via vpnfw — Comodo Dome Firewall 7.2 High 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25421 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via policyfw — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25420 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via snat — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25419 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Stored Cross-Site Scripting via schedule — Comodo Dome Firewall 7.2 High 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25418 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via fwgroups — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25416 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via device Parameter — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25417 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via QoS Rules — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25415 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via hotspot_permanent_users — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25414 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via ID Parameter Appid — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25413 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via ID Parameter — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25412 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via NTP_SERVER_LIST — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25411 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Cross-Site Scripting via DHCP — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19
CVE-2019-25409 Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via routing — Comodo Dome Firewall 6.1 Medium 2026-02-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23846 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.