Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23816

23816 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-65098 Typebot Vulnerable to Credential Theft via Client-Side Script Execution and API Authorization Bypass — typebot.io 7.4 High 2026-01-22
CVE-2025-67683 Reflected XSS in Quick.Cart — Quick.Cart 6.1AI Medium AI 2026-01-22
CVE-2025-4763 XSS in Aida Computer's Hotspot — Hotel Guest Hotspot 5.5 Medium 2026-01-22
CVE-2026-24037 Horilla HRM has XSS Bypass through Project Name — horilla 4.8 Medium 2026-01-22
CVE-2025-27380 HTML Injection Leading to Script Execution in Altium Enterprise Server — AES 7.6 High 2026-01-22
CVE-2025-27379 Stored Cross-Site Scripting in AES BOM Viewer — AES 6.8 Medium 2026-01-22
CVE-2026-23887 Group-Office has stored XSS vulnerability via unsanitized filenames — groupoffice 5.4AI Medium AI 2026-01-21
CVE-2026-23630 Docmost is vulnerable to stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) through Mermaid rendering — docmost 5.4AI Medium AI 2026-01-21
CVE-2026-23960 Argo Workflows affected by stored XSS in the artifact directory listing — argo-workflows 5.4AI Medium AI 2026-01-21
CVE-2026-23499 Saleor vulnerable to stored XSS via Unrestricted File Upload — saleor 6.5AI Medium AI 2026-01-21
CVE-2026-22808 Fleet Windows MDM endpoint has a Cross-site Scripting vulnerability — fleet 8.8AI High AI 2026-01-21
CVE-2021-47870 GetSimple CMS My SMTP Contact Plugin 1.1.2 - Stored XSS — My SMTP Contact Plugin 5.4AI Medium AI 2026-01-21
CVE-2021-47873 VestaCP < 0.9.8-25 - Stored Cross-Site Scripting — VestaCP 7.2 High 2026-01-21
CVE-2021-47858 Genexis Platinum-4410 P4410-V2-1.31A - 'start_addr' Persistent Cross-Site Scripting — Platinum-4410 7.2 High 2026-01-21
CVE-2021-47855 Openlitespeed 1.7.9 - 'Notes' Stored Cross-Site Scripting — OpenLiteSpeed 7.2 High 2026-01-21
CVE-2021-47857 Moodle 3.10.3 - 'label' Persistent Cross Site Scripting — Moodle 7.2 High 2026-01-21
CVE-2021-47817 OpenEMR 5.0.2.1 - Remote Code Execution — OpenEMR 5.4 Medium 2026-01-21
CVE-2026-20109 Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise and Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability — Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise 4.8 Medium 2026-01-21
CVE-2026-20055 Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise & Cisco Unified Contact Center Enterprise Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability — Cisco Packaged Contact Center Enterprise 4.8 Medium 2026-01-21
CVE-2025-36409 Multiple vulnerabilities found in IBM ApplinX. — ApplinX 5.4 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-36408 Multiple vulnerabilities found in IBM ApplinX. — ApplinX 6.4 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-36396 Security vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Application Gateway — Application Gateway 5.4 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-36113 Multiple vulnerabilities were addressed in IBM Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX. — Sterling Connect:Express Adapter for Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2.0 5.4 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-36066 Multiple vulnerabilities were addressed in IBM Sterling Connect:Express for UNIX. — Sterling Connect:Express Adapter for Sterling B2B Integrator 5.2.0 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-54817 MedDream PACS Premium 安全漏洞 — MedDream PACS Premium 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-53516 MedDream PACS Premium 安全漏洞 — MedDream PACS Premium 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-54495 MedDream PACS Premium 安全漏洞 — MedDream PACS Premium 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-54157 MedDream PACS Premium 安全漏洞 — MedDream PACS Premium 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-54778 MedDream PACS Premium 安全漏洞 — MedDream PACS Premium 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20
CVE-2025-46270 MedDream PACS Premium 安全漏洞 — MedDream PACS Premium 6.1 Medium 2026-01-20

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23816 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.