Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23837

23837 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-68935 ONLYOFFICE Docs 跨站脚本漏洞 — Document Server 6.4 Medium 2025-12-25
CVE-2025-2307 XSS in Verisay Communication's Aidango — Aidango 7.6 High 2025-12-25
CVE-2025-2406 XSS in Verisay Communication's Trizbi — Trizbi 7.6 High 2025-12-25
CVE-2025-2405 XSS in Verisay Communication's Titarus — Titarus 7.6 High 2025-12-25
CVE-2025-68917 ONLYOFFICE Docs 跨站脚本漏洞 — Document Server 6.4 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68915 Riello UPS NetMan 208 跨站脚本漏洞 — NetMan 5.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2019-25244 Legrand BTicino Driver Manager F454 1.0.51 CSRF and Stored XSS Vulnerabilities — Legrand BTicino Driver Manager F454 5.3 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2019-25233 AVE DOMINAplus 1.10.x Cross-Site Request Forgery and XSS Vulnerabilities — DOMINAplus 5.3 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2019-25234 Carlo Gavazzi SmartHouse Webapp 6.5.33 Cross-Site Request Forgery and XSS — SmartHouse Webapp 5.3 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2018-25131 Leica Geosystems GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 4.30.063 Stored XSS via Config Upload — GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 7.2 High 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-2154 Stored XSS in EchoCCS's Specto CM — Specto CM 5.4 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68605 WordPress Post Grid and Gutenberg Blocks plugin <= 2.3.23 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Post Grid and Gutenberg Blocks 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68599 WordPress YouTube Embed plugin <= 5.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — YouTube Embed 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68597 WordPress Jobs for WordPress plugin <= 2.8.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Jobs for WordPress 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68598 WordPress Page Builder: Live Composer plugin <= 2.1.13 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Page Builder: Live Composer 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68574 WordPress WPBakery Visual Composer WHMCS Elements plugin <= 1.0.4.3 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WPBakery Visual Composer WHMCS Elements 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68566 WordPress My auctions allegro plugin <= 3.6.35 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — My auctions allegro 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67633 WordPress Greenhouse Job Board plugin <= 2.7.3 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Greenhouse Job Board 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67630 WordPress WH Tweaks plugin <= 1.0.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WH Tweaks 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67631 WordPress Gift Hunt plugin <= 2.0.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Gift Hunt 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67632 WordPress Google AdSense for Responsive Design – GARD plugin <= 2.23 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Google AdSense for Responsive Design – GARD 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67629 WordPress Basticom Framework plugin <= 1.5.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Basticom Framework 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67627 WordPress Draft Notify plugin <= 1.5 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Draft Notify 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-67628 WordPress Review Disclaimer plugin <= 2.0.3 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Review Disclaimer 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2023-32120 WordPress Hostel plugin <= 1.1.5.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) — Hostel 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68533 WordPress WC Builder plugin <= 1.2.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WC Builder 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68532 WordPress ModelTheme Addons for WPBakery and Elementor plugin < 1.5.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — ModelTheme Addons for WPBakery and Elementor 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68528 WordPress Free Shipping Bar: Amount Left for Free Shipping for WooCommerce plugin <= 2.4.9 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Free Shipping Bar: Amount Left for Free Shipping for WooCommerce 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68527 WordPress Academy LMS plugin <= 3.4.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Academy LMS 6.5 Medium 2025-12-24
CVE-2025-68525 WordPress Category Icon plugin <= 1.0.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Category Icon 5.9 Medium 2025-12-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23837 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.