Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23853

23853 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-66040 Spotipy has a XSS vulnerability in OAuth callback server — spotipy 3.6 Low 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-64130 Zenitel TCIV-3+ Cross-site Scripting — TCIV-3+ 9.8 Critical 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-9163 Houzez <= 4.1.6 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via SVG File Upload — Houzez 6.1 Medium 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-66026 REDAXO is Vulnerable to Reflected XSS in Mediapool Info Banner via args[types] — redaxo 6.1 Medium 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-66021 OWASP Java HTML Sanitizer is vulnerable to XSS via noscript tag and improper style tag sanitization — java-html-sanitizer 6.1AI Medium AI 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-12848 XSS vulnerability when rendering filename in Webform Multiform — Drupal 6.1AI Medium AI 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-66258 Stored Cross-Site Scripting via XML Injection — Mozart FM Transmitter 5.4AI Medium AI 2025-11-26
CVE-2025-65956 Formwork CMS Has a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in Blog Tags — formwork 6.5 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-21621 GeoServer Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WMS GetFeatureInfo HTML format — geoserver 6.1 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-40890 Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Dashboards in Guardian/CMC before 25.4.0 — Guardian 7.9 High 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-12645 Inline frame – Iframe <= 0.1 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Shortcode — Inline frame – Iframe 6.4 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-13311 Just Highlight <= 1.0.3 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'Highlight Color' Setting — Just Highlight 4.4 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-12025 YouTube Subscribe <= 3.0.0 - Authenticated (Admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Title and Channel ID — YouTube Subscribe 4.4 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-12032 ZWeb - Social Mobile <= 1.0.0 - Authenticated (Admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Zweb Social Mobile – Ứng Dụng Nút Gọi Mobile 4.4 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-13383 Job Board by BestWebSoft <= 1.2.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via $_GET Array Storage — Job Board by BestWebSoft 6.1 Medium 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-13068 Telegram Bot & Channel <= 4.1 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Telegram Username — Telegram Bot & Channel 7.2 High 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-64730 Sony SNC-CX600W 跨站脚本漏洞 — SNC-CX600W 6.1AI Medium AI 2025-11-25
CVE-2025-10555 Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting Service Items Management in DELMIA Service Process Engineer on Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2025x — DELMIA Service Process Engineer 8.7 High 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-10554 Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability affecting Requirements in ENOVIA Product Manager from Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2023x through Release 3DEXPERIENCE R2025x — ENOVIA Product Manager 8.7 High 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-41087 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) stored in Taclia's web application — Taclia's web application 5.4AI Medium AI 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-12739 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Looker's Extension Loader leading to Admin Account Compromise — Looker 7.6AI High AI 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-13584 Eigenfocus Description cross site scripting — Eigenfocus 3.5 Low 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-13589 Otsuka Information Technology|FMS - Reflected Cross-site Scripting — FMS 6.1AI Medium AI 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-13577 PHPGurukul Hostel Management System register-complaint.php cross site scripting — Hostel Management System 3.5 Low 2025-11-24
CVE-2025-11186 Cookie Notice & Compliance for GDPR / CCPA <= 2.5.8 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Shortcode — Cookie Notice & Compliance for GDPR / CCPA 6.4 Medium 2025-11-22
CVE-2025-66111 WordPress Nelio Popups plugin <= 1.3.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Nelio Popups 6.5 Medium 2025-11-21
CVE-2025-66098 WordPress Travelers' Map plugin <= 2.3.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Travelers' Map 6.5 Medium 2025-11-21
CVE-2025-66092 WordPress Accordion Slider plugin <= 1.9.13 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Accordion Slider 6.5 Medium 2025-11-21
CVE-2025-66090 WordPress SKT Skill Bar plugin <= 2.5 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — SKT Skill Bar 6.5 Medium 2025-11-21
CVE-2025-66091 WordPress Stylish Cost Calculator plugin <= 8.1.5 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Stylish Cost Calculator 6.5 Medium 2025-11-21

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23853 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.