Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23911

23911 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-48279 WordPress WC MyParcel Belgium plugin <= 4.5.5-beta - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WC MyParcel Belgium 7.1 High 2025-06-09
CVE-2025-5884 Konica Minolta bizhub Display MFP Information List cross site scripting — bizhub 3.5 Low 2025-06-09
CVE-2025-5879 WuKongOpenSource WukongCRM File Upload AdminSysConfigController.java cross site scripting — WukongCRM 3.5 Low 2025-06-09
CVE-2025-49130 Laravel Translation Manager Vulnerable to Stored Cross-site Scripting — laravel-translation-manager 5.4AI Medium AI 2025-06-09
CVE-2025-41437 Reflected XSS — OpManager 4.3 Medium 2025-06-09
CVE-2025-40675 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Bagisto — Bagisto 6.1AI Medium AI 2025-06-09
CVE-2025-5528 Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share <= 3.3.75 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'heateor_mastodon_share' Parameter — Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share 6.1 Medium 2025-06-07
CVE-2025-5568 WpEvently <= 4.4.2 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce 6.4 Medium 2025-06-07
CVE-2024-9993 Essential Addons for Elementor – Best Elementor Templates, Widgets, Kits & WooCommerce Builders <= 6.1.12 - Authenticated(Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Event Calendar Widget — Essential Addons for Elementor – Popular Elementor Templates & Widgets 6.4 Medium 2025-06-07
CVE-2024-9994 Essential Addons for Elementor – Best Elementor Templates, Widgets, Kits & WooCommerce Builders <= 6.1.12 - Authenticated(Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Pricing Table Widget — Essential Addons for Elementor – Popular Elementor Templates & Widgets 6.4 Medium 2025-06-07
CVE-2025-5303 LTL Freight Quotes – Freightview Edition <= 1.0.11, LTL Freight Quotes – Daylight Edition <=2.2.6 and LTL Freight Quotes – Day & Ross Edition <= 2.1.10 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via `expiry_date` Parameter — LTL Freight Quotes – Freightview Edition 7.2 High 2025-06-07
CVE-2025-5797 code-projects Laundry System insert_type.php cross site scripting — Laundry System 3.5 Low 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-5796 code-projects Laundry System edit_type.php cross site scripting — Laundry System 3.5 Low 2025-06-06
CVE-2024-50406 License Center — License Center 5.4AI Medium AI 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-49427 WordPress Abbie Expander plugin <= 1.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Abbie Expander 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-49429 WordPress Video Embeds plugin <= 0.1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Video Embeds 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-49442 WordPress Simple Nested Menu plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Simple Nested Menu 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-49443 WordPress Bacon Ipsum plugin <= 2.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Bacon Ipsum 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-49450 WordPress SEPA Girocode plugin <= 0.5.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — SEPA Girocode 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2023-26000 WordPress Bang tinh vay <= 1.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Bang tinh vay 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2023-26001 WordPress Next Event Calendar <= 1.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Next Event Calendar 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-27334 WordPress Simple Google Static Map plugin <= 1.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Simple Google Static Map 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-28989 WordPress Read More Login plugin <= 2.0.3 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Read More Login 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-29003 WordPress The Holiday Calendar plugin <= 1.18.2.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — The Holiday Calendar 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-29011 WordPress YouTube Simple Gallery plugin <= 2.2.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — YouTube Simple Gallery 6.5 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-30627 WordPress Elegant Visitor Counter plugin <= 3.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Elegant Visitor Counter 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-30625 WordPress AppBanners plugin <= 1.5.14 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — AppBanners 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-30630 WordPress Global Translator plugin <= 2.0.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Global Translator 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-30634 WordPress WP Featured Content Slider plugin <= 2.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — WP Featured Content Slider 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-30637 WordPress Booking Ultra Pro plugin <= 1.1.20 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Booking Ultra Pro 5.9 Medium 2025-06-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23911 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.