Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23914

23914 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-31418 WordPress Gravel theme <= 1.6 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Gravel 7.1 High 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-22282 WordPress ez Form Calculator Premouium plugin <= 2.14.1.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — ez Form Calculator Premium 7.1 High 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-3219 CodeCanyon Perfex CRM Project Discussions Module 2 cross site scripting — Perfex CRM 3.5 Low 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-3087 Stored XSS Vulnerability in M-Files Web — M-Files Web 5.4AI Medium AI 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-2159 Stored XSS in M-Files Admin user interface — M-Files Admin 4.6AI Medium AI 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-2836 RegistrationMagic – Custom Registration Forms, User Registration, Payment, and User Login <= 6.0.4.3 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — RegistrationMagic – Custom Registration Forms, User Registration, Payment, and User Login 6.4 Medium 2025-04-04
CVE-2024-13898 Simple Banner <= 3.0.4 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Simple Banner – Easily add multiple Banners/Bars/Notifications/Announcements to the top or bottom of your website 4.4 Medium 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-3191 react-draft-wysiwyg 安全漏洞 — react-draft-wysiwyg 6.1 Medium 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-25001 Microsoft Edge for iOS Spoofing Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge for iOS 4.3 Medium 2025-04-04
CVE-2025-31483 Stored XSS in Miniflux Media Proxy due to improper Content-Security-Policy configuration — v2 6.1AI Medium AI 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-3157 Intelbras WRN 150 Wireless Menu cross site scripting — WRN 150 2.4 Low 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31907 WordPress Team Builder plugin <= 1.3 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Team Builder 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31902 WordPress Social Share And Social Locker Plugin <= 1.4.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Social Share And Social Locker 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31903 WordPress XV Random Quotes plugin <= 2.0.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — XV Random Quotes 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31905 WordPress Team Rosters Plugin <= 4.7 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Team Rosters 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31901 WordPress Digihood HTML Sitemap Plugin <= 3.1.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Digihood HTML Sitemap 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31898 WordPress MediaView plugin <= 1.1.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — MediaView 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31900 WordPress Lexicata plugin <= 1.0.16 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Lexicata 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31899 WordPress Awesome Logos plugin <= 1.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Awesome Logos 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31893 WordPress Botnet Attack Blocker plugin <= 2.0.0 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Botnet Attack Blocker 6.5 Medium 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31582 WordPress Contact Form vCard Generator plugin <= 2.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Contact Form vCard Generator 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31622 WordPress Advanced Typekit plugin <= 1.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Advanced Typekit 6.5 Medium 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31626 WordPress Support Helpdesk Ticket System Lite plugin <= 4.5.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Support Helpdesk Ticket System Lite 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31573 WordPress PeproDev CF7 Database plugin <= 2.0.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — PeproDev CF7 Database 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31442 WordPress Search engine keywords highlighter plugin <= 0.1.3 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Search engine keywords highlighter 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31536 WordPress CF7 Spreadsheets plugin <= 2.3.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — CF7 Spreadsheets 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31467 WordPress Flickr Photostream plugin <= 3.1.8 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Flickr Photostream 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31468 WordPress WP_Identicon plugin <= 2.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP_Identicon 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31436 WordPress Blubrry PowerPress Podcasting plugin MultiSite add-on plugin <= 0.1.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Blubrry PowerPress Podcasting plugin MultiSite add-on 7.1 High 2025-04-03
CVE-2025-31091 WordPress CM Header and Footer plugin <= 1.2.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — CM Header and Footer 6.5 Medium 2025-04-03

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23914 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.