Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23914

23914 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-31463 WordPress TGG WP Optimizer plugin <= 1.25 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — TGG WP Optimizer 5.9 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31464 WordPress Text Selection Color plugin <= 1.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Text Selection Color 5.9 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31465 WordPress Better Section Navigation Widget plugin <= 1.6.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Better Section Navigation Widget 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31470 WordPress Page Takeover plugin <= 1.1.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Page Takeover 5.9 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31471 WordPress Duplicate Page and Post plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Duplicate Page and Post 5.9 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31472 WordPress Flatty plugin <= 2.0.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Flatty 5.9 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31473 WordPress WP Database Optimizer plugin <= 1.2.1.3 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — WP Database Optimizer 5.9 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-2870 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Clinic Queuing System — Clinic Queuing System 6.1 - 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-2869 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Clinic Queuing System — Clinic Queuing System 6.1 - 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-2868 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Clinic Queuing System — Clinic Queuing System 6.1 - 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31073 WordPress Unlimited plugin <= 1.45 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Unlimited 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31077 WordPress Ultimate Blocks plugin <= 3.2.7 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Ultimate Blocks 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31088 WordPress Paid Member Subscriptions plugin <= 2.14.3 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Paid Member Subscriptions 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31083 WordPress Leaky Paywall plugin <= 4.21.7 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Leaky Paywall 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31090 WordPress Dropdown Multisite selector plugin < 0.9.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — Dropdown Multisite selector 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31094 WordPress WP Posts Carousel plugin <= 1.3.8 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — WP Posts Carousel 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31093 WordPress RPS Include Content plugin <= 1.2.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — RPS Include Content 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31096 WordPress PostX plugin <= 4.1.25 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability — PostX 6.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31102 WordPress Hostel plugin <= 1.1.5.5 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Hostel 7.1 High 2025-03-28
CVE-2019-16149 Fortinet FortiClient Enterprise Management Server 跨站脚本漏洞 — FortiClientEMS 5.4 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-1705 tagDiv Composer <= 5.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Stored Cross-Site Scripting — tagDiv Composer 6.1 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-27574 KDDI HGW BL1500HM 跨站脚本漏洞 — HGW-BL1500HM 6.1 - 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-27567 KDDI HGW BL1500HM 跨站脚本漏洞 — HGW-BL1500HM 6.1 - 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-2804 tagDiv Composer <= 5.3 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'account_id' and 'account_username' — tagDiv Composer 6.1 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2024-58128 MISP 安全漏洞 — MISP 5.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2024-58129 MISP 安全漏洞 — MISP 5.5 Medium 2025-03-28
CVE-2024-58130 MISP 安全漏洞 — MISP 7.2 High 2025-03-28
CVE-2025-31092 WordPress Click to Chat – WP Support All-in-One Floating Widget plugin <= 2.3.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Click to Chat – WP Support All-in-One Floating Widget 6.5 Medium 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-2878 Kentico CMS Additional Database Installation Wizard install.aspx cross site scripting — CMS 2.4 Low 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-31101 WordPress VaultRE Contact Form 7 plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — VaultRE Contact Form 7 5.9 Medium 2025-03-27

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23914 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.