Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23915

23915 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-28929 WordPress Tabbed Login Widget plugin <= 1.1.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Tabbed Login Widget 6.5 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28926 WordPress Post Read Time plugin <= 1.2.6 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Post Read Time 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28919 WordPress Easy Image Display plugin <= 1.2.5 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Easy Image Display 6.5 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28918 WordPress Featured Image Thumbnail Grid plugin <= 6.8 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Featured Image Thumbnail Grid 6.5 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28914 WordPress wordpress login form to anywhere plugin <= 0.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — wordpress login form to anywhere 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28908 WordPress pipDisqus plugin <= 1.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — pipDisqus 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28907 WordPress WP Last Modified plugin <= 0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Last Modified 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28906 WordPress Skitter Slideshow plugin <= 2.5.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Skitter Slideshow 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28905 WordPress Featured Posts Grid plugin <= 1.7 - CSRF to Stored XSS vulnerability — Featured Posts Grid 7.1 High 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28895 WordPress Custom top bar plugin <= 2.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability — Custom top bar 7.1 High 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28879 WordPress Bee Layer Slider plugin <= 1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Bee Layer Slider 6.5 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28878 WordPress Awesome Surveys plugin <= 2.0.10 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Awesome Surveys 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28875 WordPress BP Email Assign Templates By shanebp plugin <= 1.6 - Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability — BP Email Assign Templates 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28871 WordPress Block Spam By Math Reloaded plugin <= 2.2.4 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Block Spam By Math Reloaded 5.9 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-28870 WordPress amoCRM WebForm plugin <= 1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — amoCRM WebForm 6.5 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2208 aitangbao springboot-manager Filename upload cross site scripting — springboot-manager 2.4 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2207 aitangbao springboot-manager dept cross site scripting — springboot-manager 2.4 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2206 aitangbao springboot-manager permission cross site scripting — springboot-manager 2.4 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2024-56338 IBM Sterling B2B Integrator cross-site scripting — Sterling B2B Integrator Standard Edition 4.8 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2023-37933 Fortinet FortiADC 跨站脚本漏洞 — FortiADC 8.6 High 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2196 MRCMS org.marker.mushroom.controller.FileController upload.do upload cross site scripting — MRCMS 3.5 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2195 MRCMS org.marker.mushroom.controller.FileController rename.do rename cross site scripting — MRCMS 3.5 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2194 MRCMS org.marker.mushroom.controller.FileController list.do list cross site scripting — MRCMS 3.5 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-2191 Claro A7600-A1 Ping6 Diagnóstico form2pingv6.cgi cross site scripting — A7600-A1 2.4 Low 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-1434 XSS in AREAL SAS Topkapi Vision Webserv2 — Topkapi Vision Webserv2 6.1 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2024-13413 ProductDyno <= 1.0.24 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'res' Parameter — ProductDyno 6.1 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-27434 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP Commerce (Swagger UI) — SAP Commerce (Swagger UI) 8.8 High 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-27431 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java — SAP NetWeaver Application Server Java 5.4 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-26659 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP (applications based on SAP GUI for HTML) — SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP (applications based on SAP GUI for HTML) 6.1 Medium 2025-03-11
CVE-2025-25245 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) — SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform (Web Intelligence) 5.4 Medium 2025-03-11

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23915 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.