Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23919

23919 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-22754 WordPress Amber Plugin <=1.4.4 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Amber 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22758 WordPress Elementor AI Addons plugin <= 2.2.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Elementor AI Addons 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22759 WordPress Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid – Visual Drag and Drop Editor plugin <= 1.27.5 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Post and Page Builder by BoldGrid 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22760 WordPress CodeBard Help Desk plugin <= 1.1.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — CodeBard Help Desk 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22762 WordPress Octrace Support Pro plugin <= 1.2.7 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WordPress HelpDesk & Support Ticket System Plugin – Octrace Support 5.9 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22761 WordPress Ajax Contact Form plugin <= 1.4.1 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Ajax Contact Form 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22765 WordPress WP Order By Plugin <= 1.4.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Order By 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22764 WordPress WP Post Corrector Plugin <= 1.0.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Post Corrector 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22766 WordPress Zarinpal Paid Download Plugin <= 2.3 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Zarinpal Paid Download 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22769 WordPress Multifox theme <= 1.3.7 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Multifox 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22776 WordPress WP Bulletin Board Plugin <= 1.1.4 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Bulletin Board 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22778 WordPress Lijit Search Plugin <= 1.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Lijit Search 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22781 WordPress Nativery Plugin plugin <= 0.1.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Nativery 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22780 WordPress wp-pano Plugin <= 1.17 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — wp-pano 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22788 WordPress CoDesigner plugin <= 4.29 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — CoDesigner 5.9 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22793 WordPress Bold pagos en linea Plugin <= 3.1.4 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Bold pagos en linea 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22797 WordPress Gallery and Lightbox plugin <= 1.0.14 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Gallery and Lightbox 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22795 WordPress Multilang Contact Form Plugin <= 1.5 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Multilang Contact Form 7.1 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22798 WordPress Responsive jQuery Slider plugin <= 1.1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Responsive jQuery Slider 6.5 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-47140 Observium 跨站脚本漏洞 — Observium 8.7 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-47002 Observium 跨站脚本漏洞 — Observium 8.7 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-45061 Observium 跨站脚本漏洞 — Observium 8.7 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-12593 PDF for WPForms + Drag and Drop Template Builder <= 4.6.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via yeepdf_dotab Shortcode — PDF for WPForms + Drag and Drop Template Builder 6.4 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-0193 Stored Cross-site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability in the MGate 5121/5122/5123 Series — MGate 5121 Series 4.8 - 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-35280 Fortinet FortiDeceptor 跨站脚本漏洞 — FortiDeceptor 5.1 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-12818 WP Smart TV <= 2.1.8 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — WP Smart TV 6.4 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-13351 Social proof testimonials and reviews by Repuso <= 5.20 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Reviews Widgets for Google & 45+ platforms by Repuso 7.2 High 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-12423 Contact Form 7 Redirect & Thank You Page <= 1.0.7 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — Business Essentials for Contact Form 7 6.1 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2024-12403 Image Gallery – Responsive Photo Gallery <= 1.0.5 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — Awesome Responsive Photo Gallery – Image & Video Lightbox Gallery 6.1 Medium 2025-01-15
CVE-2025-0354 NEC Aterm多款产品 跨站脚本漏洞 — WG2600HS 4.8 Medium 2025-01-15

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23919 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.