Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 25827

25827 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-2422 WP Composer <= 1.0.5 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'pbwp_raw_shortcode' Shortcode — WP Composer – The Easiest Page Builder 6.4 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-15463 SSL Zen <= 4.7.42 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'uri' and 'host' Parameters — SSL Zen — SSL Certificate Installer & HTTPS Redirects 6.1 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-13770 AppMySite <= 3.15.3 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via save_ams_license_key AJAX Handler — AppMySite – WordPress & WooCommerce Mobile App Builder (No-Code Android & iOS App Maker) 6.4 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-15664 Quill Forms | Conversational Multi Step Forms, Surveys & quizzes <= 5.7.1 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Multiple Choice 'Other' Value — Quill Forms | Conversational Multi Step Forms, Surveys & quizzes 7.2 High 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-11608 WP Customer Reviews <= 3.7.8 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'wpcr3_fname' Parameter — WP Customer Reviews 6.1 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-12042 WP2Social Auto Publish <= 2.4.12 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'pages' Parameter — WP2Social Auto Publish 4.4 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-92967 Pochipp <= 1.20.2 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'keyword' Parameter — Pochipp 6.1 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-89081 Tutor LMS <= 4.0.8 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via 'back_url' and 'search' Parameters — Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution 6.1 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-13354 Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster <= 1.4.0.5 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content — Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster 7.2 High 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-77820 WPComplete <= 2.9.9.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'empty' Shortcode Attribute — WPComplete 6.4 Medium 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-93922 SiYuan through 3.8.4 Stored XSS via notebook names — siyuan 8.8 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-93923 SiYuan through 3.8.4 Stored XSS via Heading Style Attribute — siyuan 8.8 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-85271 Open edX Platform: Stored CSS Injection in Email Digest Notifications via Unsanitized Thread Title (incomplete patch of CVE-2026-42857) — openedx-platform 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-84108 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 8.1 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-84106 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 8.9 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-84074 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 8.9 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-84070 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 8.9 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-84031 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 9.0 Critical 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-82890 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 5.9 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-82832 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 9.6 Critical 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-93432 Io.quarkus.qute:quarkus-core: cross-site scripting (xss) and json injection via qute {#eval} section in quarkus — Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.6.redhat 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-91127 File Viewer: DOM XSS via unsafe hyperlink schemes in the legacy DOC renderer — file-viewer 8.2 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-84992 md-editor-v3: XSS via fenced-code language rendering bypass — md-editor-v3 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-77616 Semantic MediaWiki affected by reflected XSS in `Special:Ask` via a forged cursor pagination token — SemanticMediaWiki 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-77610 Semantic MediaWiki has a query debug output XSS (`DebugFormatter`) — SemanticMediaWiki 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-77607 Semantic MediaWiki affected by Special:Ask table `sep` parameter reflected XSS — SemanticMediaWiki 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-77608 Semantic MediaWiki has reflected XSS in `Special:SearchByProperty` (`property` and `value` parameters) — SemanticMediaWiki 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-77606 Semantic MediaWiki has reflected XSS in Special:Ask plain table headers — SemanticMediaWiki 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18
CVE-2025-61682 Semantic MediaWiki vulnerable to stored XSS through wikitext via improper use of non-reserved data attributes — SemanticMediaWiki 8.6 High 2026-09-18
CVE-2026-1037 Multiple vulnerabilities affect IBM License Key Server Administration and Reporting Tool and IBM LKS Administration Agent — Common Licensing 6.1 Medium 2026-09-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 25827 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.