Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23910

23910 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2022-20936 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20935 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20932 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20905 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20872 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20843 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20840 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20839 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20838 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20836 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20835 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20834 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20833 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20832 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-20831 Cisco Firepower Management Center 跨站脚本漏洞 — Cisco Firepower Management Center 4.8 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-42786 Wiesemann & Theis: XSS vulnerability in web interface of the Com-Server family — Com-Server LC 5.4 Medium 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-43754 SUMA/UYUNI reflected cross site scripting in /rhn/audit/scap/Search.do — SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for SUSE Manager Server 4.2 2.6 Low 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-39398 InfotelGLPI vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting — tasklists 8.8 High 2022-11-10
CVE-2022-44590 WordPress Simple Video Embedder plugin <= 2.2 - Auth. Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Simple Video Embedder (WordPress plugin) 5.4 Medium 2022-11-09
CVE-2022-32776 WordPress Advanced Ads – Ad Manager & AdSense plugin <= 1.31.1 - Auth. Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Advanced Ads – Ad Manager & AdSense 4.8 Medium 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-41980 WordPress Mantenimiento web plugin <= 0.13 - Auth. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Mantenimiento web (WordPress plugin) 4.8 Medium 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-30545 WordPress 5 Anker Connect plugin <= 1.2.6 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — 5 Anker Connect (WordPress plugin) 4.8 Medium 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-33322 Mitsubishi Electric consumer electronics products 跨站脚本漏洞 — Air Conditioning MSZ-FD40/56/63/71/8022S 6.1 - 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-41208 SAP Financial Consolidation 跨站脚本漏洞 — SAP Financial Consolidation 5.4 Medium 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-41258 SAP Financial Consolidation 跨站脚本漏洞 — SAP Financial Consolidation 6.5 Medium 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-41260 SAP Financial Consolidation 跨站脚本漏洞 — SAP Financial Consolidation 6.1 Medium 2022-11-08
CVE-2022-3462 Highlight Focus <= 1.1 - Admin+ Stored Cross Site Scripting — Highlight Focus 4.8 - 2022-11-07
CVE-2022-3873 Cross-site Scripting (XSS) - DOM in jgraph/drawio — jgraph/drawio 6.1 - 2022-11-07
CVE-2022-43569 Persistent Cross-Site Scripting via a Data Model object name in Splunk Enterprise — Splunk Enterprise 8.0 High 2022-11-04
CVE-2022-43568 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the radio template in Splunk Enterprise — Splunk Enterprise 8.8 High 2022-11-04

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23910 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.