Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 21606

21606 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, ConfidentialityBypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and DesignUnderstand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and DesignIf available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2024-13583 Simple Gallery with Filter <= 2.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Simple Gallery with Filter 6.4 Medium2025-01-24
CVE-2024-13659 Listamester <= 2.3.4 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Listamester 6.4 Medium2025-01-24
CVE-2025-0314 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in GitLab — GitLab 8.7 High2025-01-24
CVE-2025-23227 IBM Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager cross-site scripting — Tivoli Application Dependency Discovery Manager 6.4 Medium2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23834 WordPress Links/Problem Reporter plugin <= 2.6.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Links/Problem Reporter 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23836 WordPress Custom Coming Soon Plugin <= 2.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Custom Coming Soon 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23835 WordPress Legal + Plugin <= 1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Legal + 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23894 WordPress wp-flickr-press Plugin <= 2.6.4 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — wp-flickr-press 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23960 WordPress Save & Import Image from URL Plugin <= 0.7 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Save & Import Image from URL 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23733 WordPress SC Simple Zazzle plugin <= 1.1.6 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — SC Simple Zazzle 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23725 WordPress Accessibility Task Manager plugin <= 1.2.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Accessibility Task Manager 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23724 WordPress University Quizzes Online plugin <= 1.4 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — University Quizzes Online 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23730 WordPress FLX Dashboard Groups plugin <= 0.0.7 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — FLX Dashboard Groups 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23727 WordPress AZ Content Finder plugin <= 0.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — AZ Content Finder 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23729 WordPress XTRA Settings plugin <= 2.1.8 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — XTRA Settings 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23634 WordPress Youtube Video Grid plugin <= 1.9 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Youtube Video Grid 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23723 WordPress Plestar Directory Listing plugin <= 1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Plestar Directory Listing 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23722 WordPress Mind3doM RyeBread Widgets plugin <= 1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Mind3doM RyeBread Widgets 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23636 WordPress My Favorite Car plugin <= 1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — My Favorite Car 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23629 WordPress Gallerio plugin <= 1.0.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Gallerio 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23624 WordPress WpDevTool plugin <= 0.1.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WpDevTool 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23626 WordPress Kumihimo plugin <= 1.0.2 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Kumihimo 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23545 WordPress WP Social Broadcast plugin <= 1.0.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Social Broadcast 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23628 WordPress GeoDigs plugin <= 3.4.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — GeoDigs 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23544 WordPress StatPressCN plugin <= 1.9.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — StatPressCN 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-22264 WordPress WP Query Creator plugin <= 1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Query Creator 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23541 WordPress Download, Downloads plugin <= 1.4.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Download, Downloads 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2025-23540 WordPress WP Front-end login and register plugin <= 2.1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Front-end login and register 7.1 High2025-01-23
CVE-2024-10539 Reflected XSS in Uyumsoft's ERP — Uyumsoft ERP 5.5 Medium2025-01-23
CVE-2024-12118 The Events Calendar <= 6.9.0 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — The Events Calendar 6.4 Medium2025-01-23

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 21606 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.