Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 21610

21610 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, ConfidentialityBypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignUse a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and DesignUnderstand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, ImplementationUnderstand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and DesignFor any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and DesignIf available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2025-23434 WordPress Easy EU Cookie law plugin <= 1.3.3.1 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Easy EU Cookie law 6.5 Medium2025-01-16
CVE-2025-23444 WordPress Scroll Top Advanced plugin <= 2.5 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Scroll Top Advanced 6.5 Medium2025-01-16
CVE-2025-23453 WordPress Stars SMTP Mailer plugin <= 1.7 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Stars SMTP Mailer 7.1 High2025-01-16
CVE-2025-23429 WordPress Altima Lookbook Free for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Altima Lookbook Free for WooCommerce 7.1 High2025-01-16
CVE-2025-23432 WordPress AlT Report plugin <= 1.12.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — AlT Report 7.1 High2025-01-16
CVE-2024-41746 IBM CICS TX cross-site scripting — CICS TX Advanced 7.2 High2025-01-16
CVE-2024-13387 WP Responsive Tabs <= 1.2.9 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — WP Responsive Tabs 6.4 Medium2025-01-16
CVE-2024-11452 Chamber Dashboard Business Directory <= 3.3.8 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Chamber Dashboard Business Directory 6.4 Medium2025-01-16
CVE-2025-0170 DWT - Directory & Listing WordPress Theme <= 3.3.3 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — DWT - Directory & Listing WordPress Theme 6.1 Medium2025-01-16
CVE-2025-0215 UpdraftPlus - Backup/Restore <= 1.24.12 - Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — UpdraftPlus: WP Backup & Migration Plugin 6.1 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-0485 Fanli2012 native-php-cms sysconfig_doedit.php cross site scripting — native-php-cms 3.5 Low2025-01-15
CVE-2025-0483 Fanli2012 native-php-cms jump.php cross site scripting — native-php-cms 3.5 Low2025-01-15
CVE-2024-7085 Exposure of private information vulnerability has been discovered in OpenText™ Solutions Business Manager (SBM). — Solutions Business Manager (SBM) 6.1 -2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22317 WordPress Gallery Images Ape plugin <= 2.2.8 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Photo Gallery – Image Gallery by Ape 7.1 High2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22329 WordPress Free Google Maps plugin <= 1.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Free Google Maps 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22587 WordPress SEO Bulk Editor plugin <= 1.1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — SEO Bulk Editor 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22724 WordPress Product Carousel For WooCommerce – WoorouSell plugin <= 1.1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Product Carousel For WooCommerce – WoorouSell 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22734 WordPress Posts Footer Manager Plugin <= 2.1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Posts Footer Manager 5.9 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22742 WordPress WP ViewSTL plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP ViewSTL 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22738 WordPress WP ULike plugin <= 4.7.6 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP ULike 5.9 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22744 WordPress S-DEV SEO plugin <= 1.88 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — S-DEV SEO 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22743 WordPress Twitter Bootstrap Collapse aka Accordian Shortcode plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Twitter Bootstrap Collapse aka Accordian Shortcode 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22745 WordPress Navigation Du Lapin Blanc plugin <= 1.1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Navigation Du Lapin Blanc 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22746 WordPress HireHive Job Plugin plugin <= 2.9.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — HireHive Job Plugin 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22747 WordPress Foundation Columns plugin <= 0.8 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Foundation Columns 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22749 WordPress Social Media Engine plugin <= 1.0.2 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Social Media Engine 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22748 WordPress SetMore Theme – Custom Post Types plugin <= 1.1 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — SetMore Theme – Custom Post Types 6.5 Medium2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22750 WordPress Post Carousel & Slider plugin <= 1.0.4 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Post Carousel & Slider 7.1 High2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22751 WordPress Partners Plugin <= 0.2.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Partners 7.1 High2025-01-15
CVE-2025-22752 WordPress GSheetConnector for Forminator Forms Plugin <= 1.0.12 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — GSheetConnector for Forminator Forms 7.1 High2025-01-15

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 21610 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.