Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-88 (参数注入或修改) — Vulnerability Class 286

286 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-88 (参数注入或修改). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-88 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs command strings without properly delimiting arguments, options, or switches intended for external components. This flaw typically arises when developers interpolate user-controlled data directly into command lines, mistakenly assuming that only specified arguments will be processed. Attackers exploit this by injecting additional arguments or switches that alter the command’s behavior, potentially leading to unauthorized code execution or privilege escalation. To mitigate this risk, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all inputs before inclusion in command strings. Best practices include using parameterized APIs that separate commands from arguments, avoiding shell interpreters when possible, and employing allowlists to restrict acceptable input formats. By ensuring robust argument separation and rigorous input filtering, organizations can effectively prevent attackers from manipulating command execution contexts and maintain system integrity against injection-based attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs a string for a command to be executed by a separate component in another control sphere, but it does not properly delimit the intended arguments, options, or switches within that command string. When creating commands using interpolation into a string, developers may assume that only the arguments/options that they specify will be processed. This assumption may be even stronger when the programmer has encoded the command in a way that prevents separate commands from being provided maliciously, e.g. in the case of shell metacharacters. When constructing the command, the developer may use whitespace or other delimiters that are required to separate arguments when the command. However, if an attacker can provide an untrusted input that contains argument-separating delimiters, then the resulting command will have more arguments than intended by the developer. The attacker may then be able to change the behavior of the command. Depending on the functionality supported by the extraneous arguments, this may have security-relevant consequences.
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Other Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Alter Execution Logic, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data
An attacker could include arguments that allow unintended commands or code to be executed, allow sensitive data to be read or modified or could cause other unintended behavior.
Mitigations (5)
Implementation Where possible, avoid building a single string that contains the command and its arguments. Some languages or frameworks have functions that support specifying independent arguments, e.g. as an array, which is used to automatically perform the appropriate quoting or escaping while building the command. For example, in PHP, escapeshellarg() can be used to escape a single argument to system(), or …
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your product: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, request headers as well as content, URL components, e-mail, files, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Perform input validation at well-defined interfaces.
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Implementation Directly convert your input type into the expected data type, such as using a conversion function that translates a string into a number. After converting to the expected data type, ensure that the input's values fall within the expected range of allowable values and that multi-field consistencies are maintained.
Implementation Inputs should be decoded and canonicalized to the application's current internal representation before being validated (CWE-180, CWE-181). Make sure that your application does not inadvertently decode the same input twice (CWE-174). Such errors could be used to bypass allowlist schemes by introducing dangerous inputs after they have been checked. Use libraries such as the OWASP ESAPI Canonicalizat…
Examples (2)
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE-2016-10033 / [REF-1249] provides a useful real-world example of this weakness within PHPMailer.
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-97350 Local Privilege Escalation via OpenVPN Configuration and Proxy Settings in Securepoint SSL VPN Client v2 for Windows — Securepoint SSL VPN Client v2 6.9 Medium 2026-11-03
CVE-2026-91909 Dell OpenManage Enterprise 4.8.0 前参数注入漏洞 — OpenManage Enterprise 4.6 Medium 2026-11-02
CVE-2026-62968 Dream Displays has command-line argument injection in yt-dlp invocation — dreamdisplays 8.7 High 2026-10-30
CVE-2026-116252 pgAdmin 4: Materialized view refresh redirects its connection through a crafted database name — pgAdmin 4 6.5 Medium 2026-10-30
CVE-2026-111504 Dell OpenManage 4.8.0 前版本参数注入漏洞 — OpenManage Enterprise 7.2 High 2026-10-30
CVE-2026-50056 Zimbra Collaboration Suite Local Privilege Escalation via zmmailboxdmgr JVM Argument Injection — Zimbra Collaboration Suite 7.8 High 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-115372 Incus 7.3.0 before 7.5.0 Project Restriction Bypass via block.create_options — incus 8.5 High 2026-10-22
CVE-2026-111813 Apache Traffic Server: magick plugin passes client query strings unfiltered to ImageMagick convert in the default configuration — Apache Traffic Server 10.0 Critical 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-113708 Argo CD: A Kustomize remote ref can run commands in the repo-server — argo-cd 9.9 Critical 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-112944 launch-editor: Editor CLI flag misinterpretation causing arbitrary command execution for some editors — launch-editor 6.3 Medium 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-111581 Libblockdev: libblockdev: argument injection in ntfs/vfat label-setting helpers via udisks2 setlabel() d-bus method — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 3.3 Low 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-111728 Seanime v3.10.3 Argument Injection via TranscodeHwAccelCustomSettings — Seanime 5.4 Medium 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-104715 Cifs-utils: mount.cifs credential-file option injection allows local privilege boundary bypass — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 7.8 High 2026-10-16
CVE-2026-110859 GitPython before 3.2.0 Arbitrary File Read via Head.checkout() Branch Name — GitPython 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-110858 GitPython 3.1.30 before 3.2.0 Command Injection via Remote.pull() Refspec — GitPython 8.1 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-108390 HestiaCP Low-Privileged User to Root via Config-Field Injection and PATH Hijacking — hestiacp 9.9 Critical 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-73539 Gitea external renderer argument injection and code execution — Gitea - - 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-97798 Windows Error Reporting Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 21H2 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-92892 Potential command execution on the host running JFrog CLI. — jfrog-cli 9.0 Critical 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-109966 yt-dlp-web-ui through 4.0.0 Argument Injection via Service.Formats JSON-RPC Method — yt-dlp-web-ui 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108929 Netcore NR268 DDNS DDNSset.cgi execvp argument injection — NR268 9.9 Critical 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-108963 databasement多个版本命令注入漏洞 — databasement 8.8 High 2026-10-11
CVE-2026-107802 SumatraPDF — Windows command-line argument injection in AI selection-translate — sumatrapdf 7.1 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-11939 Security vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access — Security Verify Access 2.7 Low 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-18740 Security vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access — Security Verify Access 8.8 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-19482 Security vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access — Security Verify Access 8.8 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-107639 ILIAS before 9.24, 10.12, and 11.5 Argument Injection via Image Map Question Upload Filename — ILIAS 8.8 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-93699 cPanel WP Toolkit任意代码执行漏洞 — WP Toolkit 8.5 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-87667 Brocade Fabric OS参数注入漏洞 — Fabric OS 8.4 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-87687 Brocade Fabric OS 垂直提权与越权漏洞 — Fabric OS 8.5 High 2026-10-08

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-88 (参数注入或修改) represent 286 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.