Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) — Vulnerability Class 11034

11034 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-89 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs SQL commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious SQL syntax into user-facing inputs, such as login fields or search queries, to manipulate the database’s behavior. This exploitation can lead to unauthorized data access, data modification, or complete system compromise by bypassing authentication or executing arbitrary commands. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing strict input validation and, most effectively, using parameterized queries or prepared statements. These techniques ensure that user input is treated strictly as data rather than executable code, thereby preventing the injection of malicious SQL elements. By separating code logic from data inputs, applications maintain integrity and protect sensitive information from unauthorized manipulation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Common Consequences (5)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Adversaries could execute system commands, typically by changing the SQL statement to redirect output to a file that can then be executed.
Confidentiality Read Application Data
Since SQL databases generally hold sensitive data, loss of confidentiality is a frequent problem with SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Authentication Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
If poor SQL commands are used to check user names and passwords or perform other kinds of authentication, it may be possible to connect to the product as another user with no previous knowledge of the password.
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If authorization information is held in a SQL database, it may be possible to change this information through the successful exploitation of a SQL injection vulnerability.
Integrity Modify Application Data
Just as it may be possible to read sensitive information, it is also possible to modify or even delete this information with a SQL injection attack.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedur…
Architecture and Design, Operation Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database ad…
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
Examples (2)
In 2008, a large number of web servers were compromised using the same SQL injection attack string. This single string worked against many different programs. The SQL injection was then used to modify the web sites to serve malicious code.
The following code dynamically constructs and executes a SQL query that searches for items matching a specified name. The query restricts the items displayed to those where owner matches the user name of the currently-authenticated user.
... string userName = ctx.getAuthenticatedUserName(); string query = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = '" + userName + "' AND itemname = '" + ItemName.Text + "'"; sda = new SqlDataAdapter(query, conn); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); sda.Fill(dt); ...
Bad · C#
SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = <userName> AND itemname = <itemName>;
Informative
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-42093 Redash: SQL Injection via Query Results parameterized query substitution — redash 8.7 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-101997 Junos OS: SRX Series: A network-based attacker causes Remote Code Execution when Security Intelligence is used without a tls-profile authentication — Junos OS 8.1 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-103946 SQL Injection — Nessus 8.3 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-89076 MOVEit Transfer SQL injection in custom reporting — MOVEit Transfer 7.2 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-110614 Yiuman citrus through 0.15.0 ORDER BY SQL Injection via sortBy Parameter — citrus 6.5 Medium 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-110609 Dromara Skyeye through commit 65d3ddcede70 SQL Injection via keyword Parameter — skyeye 6.5 Medium 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-94348 Dell PowerScale InsightIQ 5.2.0-6.3.0 SQL注入漏洞 — PowerScale InsightIQ 6.1 Medium 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-108065 Unauthenticated SQL Injection in Channel Software WebAlliance eCommerce — WebAlliance eCommerce 9.8 Critical 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-105067 WordPress Modern Events Calendar Lite plugin < 7.37.0 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Modern Events Calendar Lite 8.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-105107 Koha SQL injection in reports/cat_issues_top.pl via the Criteria, Filter and Limit request parameters — Koha 7.6 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-109901 WordPress CP Multi View Event Calendar plugin <= 1.4.41 - SQL Injection vulnerability — CP Multi View Event Calendar 8.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-89310 SQL Command Injection Vulnerability in JTL-WMS — JTL-WMS 9.9 Critical 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-101926 Hyyan WooCommerce Polylang Integration <= 1.5.0 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'variation_ids' Parameter — Hyyan WooCommerce Polylang Integration 6.5 Medium 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-95808 Form Maker by 10Web <= 1.15.48 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via 'inputs' Parameter — Form Maker by 10Web – Mobile-Friendly Drag & Drop Contact Form Builder 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-78193 JTL-Connector for WooCommerce <= 2.4.3 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection — JTL-Connector for WooCommerce 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-96661 Gmedia Photo Gallery <= 1.25.1 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via 'gmedia__in' Parameter — Gmedia Photo Gallery 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-102251 Abandoned Cart Pro for WooCommerce <= 10.8.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via AES-CTR Ciphertext Forgery in 'validate' Parameter — Abandoned Cart Pro for WooCommerce 7.5 High 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-97668 Abandoned Cart Pro for WooCommerce <= 10.8.0 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via Guest Persistent Cart meta_value — Abandoned Cart Pro for WooCommerce 9.8 Critical 2026-10-14
CVE-2026-63165 Omnispace Agora Project < 26.10.0 SQL Injection via sortEvents Parameter — Agora Project 8.1 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-63152 Omnispace Agora Project < 26.10.0 Second-Order SQL Injection via _idCategoryFilter — Agora Project 8.1 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-63154 Omnispace Agora Project < 26.10.0 SQL Identifier Injection via agoraFields[] — Agora Project 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-110083 Adobe Experience Manager | Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') (CWE-89) — Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 7.1 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-88075 Configuration Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft Configuration Manager 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-70049 Microsoft Configuration Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft Configuration Manager 8.0 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-70266 Microsoft Office SharePoint Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Microsoft SharePoint Server Subscription Edition 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-23707 Fortinet多款产品SQL注入漏洞 — FortiManager Cloud 6.5 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-23706 Fortinet FortiAnalyzer/Manager SQL注入漏洞 — FortiAnalyzer Cloud 5.9 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-23705 FortiAnalyzer/Manager SQL注入漏洞 — FortiAnalyzer 6.5 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2025-46773 FortiAnalyzer SQL注入漏洞影响多版本 — FortiAnalyzer Cloud 7.9 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2025-57739 FortiMail SQL注入漏洞影响7.2-7.6系列 — FortiMail 7.7 High 2026-10-13

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) represent 11034 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.