Support Us — Your donation helps us keep running

Goal: 1000 CNY,Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2005-2098
Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
The KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING operation in the Linux kernel before 2.6.12.5 contains an error path that does not properly release the session management semaphore, which allows local users or remote attackers to cause a denial of service (semaphore hang) via a new session keyring (1) with an empty name string, (2) with a long name string, (3) with the key quota reached, or (4) ENOMEM.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux Kernel 本地拒绝服务漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux内核2.6.12.5之前的版本中 KEYCTL_JOIN_SESSION_KEYRING运算包含错误路径,该错误路径不能正确地释放会话管理信号量。这使得本地用户或远程攻击者可以借助于带有(1)空名称字符串的新会话钥匙圈,带有(2)长的名称字符串的新会话钥匙圈,带有(3)达到的钥匙配额会话钥匙圈或(4)ENOMEM,造成拒绝服务(信号量挂起)。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
-n/a n/a -
II. Public POCs for CVE-2005-2098
#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC
III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2005-2098
Please Login to view more intelligence information
New Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2005-2098

No comments yet


Leave a comment