Support Us — Your donation helps us keep running

Goal: 1000 CNY,Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2006-1195
Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
The enet_protocol_handle_send_fragment function in protocol.c for ENet library CVS version Jul 2005 and earlier, as used in products including (1) Cube, (2) Sauerbraten, and (3) Duke3d_w32, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a packet fragment with a large total data size, which triggers an application abort when memory allocation fails.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
ENet ‘protocol.c’多个拒绝服务漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
用于ENet 库CVS在2005年7月和更早期版本的protocol.c中的enet_protocol_handle_send_fragment函数,当用于包括(1) Cube,(2) Sauerbraten,和(3) Duke3d_w32的产品上时,远程攻击者可通过以下途径制造一个拒绝服务(应用程序崩溃):带有大量数据量大小的数据段,当内存分配失败时会引起应用程序退出。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
-n/a n/a -
II. Public POCs for CVE-2006-1195
#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC
III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2006-1195
Please Login to view more intelligence information
New Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2006-1195

No comments yet


Leave a comment