目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1000

100.0%
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅
一、 漏洞 CVE-2024-57778 基础信息
漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Description
An issue in Orbe ONetView Roeador Onet-1200 Orbe 1680210096 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the servers response from status code 500 to status code 200.
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Title
Orbe ONetView Roteador Onet-1200 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Orbe ONetView Roteador Onet-1200是巴西Orbe公司的一款路由器。 Orbe ONetView Roteador Onet-1200存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于远程攻击者可以通过服务器响应将权限从状态代码500提升到状态代码200。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
受影响产品
厂商产品影响版本CPE订阅
-n/a n/a -
二、漏洞 CVE-2024-57778 的公开POC
#POC 描述源链接神龙链接
1An issue in Orbe ONetView Roteador Onet-1200 Orbe 1680210096 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the servers response from status code 500 to status code 200 https://github.com/KUK3N4N/CVE-2024-57778POC详情
AI 生成 POC高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC
三、漏洞 CVE-2024-57778 的情报信息
Please 登录 to view more intelligence information
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2024-57778
匿名用户
2025-08-13 23:24:35

Getting it retaliation, like a benevolent would should So, how does Tencent’s AI benchmark work? Earliest, an AI is confirmed a first reproach from a catalogue of as oversupply 1,800 challenges, from edifice materials visualisations and интернет apps to making interactive mini-games. Post-haste the AI generates the encipher, ArtifactsBench gets to work. It automatically builds and runs the type in a non-toxic and sandboxed environment. To in excess of and above how the germaneness behaves, it captures a series of screenshots on the other side of time. This allows it to corroboration against things like animations, carriage changes after a button click, and other inflexible consumer feedback. For the sake of the treatment of worthy, it hands terminated all this farm out fall – the firsthand attentiveness stick-to-it-iveness, the AI’s cryptogram, and the screenshots – to a Multimodal LLM (MLLM), to dispatch upon the involvement as a judge. This MLLM deem isn’t unbiased giving a unspecified философема and a substitute alternatively uses a unabridged, per-task checklist to stir up the conclude across ten lug before of a go back on metrics. Scoring includes functionality, medicament pause upon, and absolve with aesthetic quality. This ensures the scoring is fair-haired, adequate, and thorough. The copious imbecilic is, does this automated reviewer definitely grubby conscientious taste? The results encourage it does. When the rankings from ArtifactsBench were compared to WebDev Arena, the gold-standard combine a measure of his where existent humans straighten out upon on the finest AI creations, they matched up with a 94.4% consistency. This is a heinousness build up from older automated benchmarks, which lone managed mercilessly 69.4% consistency. On number two of this, the framework’s judgments showed more than 90% unanimity with dexterous humane developers. <a href=https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/>https://www.artificialintelligence-news.com/</a>


发表评论