Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-27840— ZITADEL's truncated opaque tokens are still valid

Quick assessment

Affected
zitadel zitadel
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

ZITADEL是瑞士ZITADEL开源的一个 Auth0、Firebase Auth、AWS Cognito 以及为容器和无服务器时代构建的 Keycloak 的现代开源替代方案。 ZITADEL 2.31.0版本至3.4.7之前版本和4.11.0之前版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于令牌验证不当。

CVSS 4.3 · Medium EPSS 0.16% · P5

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1190 · Exploit Public-Facing Application
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-27840

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
ZITADEL's truncated opaque tokens are still valid
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
ZITADEL is an open source identity management platform. Starting in version 2.31.0 and prior to versions 3.4.7 and 4.11.0, opaque OIDC access tokens in the v2 format truncated to 80 characters are still considered valid. Zitadel uses a symmetric AES encryption for opaque tokens. The cleartext payload is a concatenation of a couple of identifiers, such as a token ID and user ID. Internally Zitadel has 2 different versions of token payloads. v1 tokens are no longer created, but are still verified as to not invalidate existing session after upgrade. The cleartext payload has a format of `<token_id>:<user_id>`. v2 tokens distinguished further where the `token_id` is of the format `v2_<oidc_session_id>-at_<access_token_id>`. V1 token authZ/N session data is retrieved from the database using the (simple) `token_id` value and `user_id` value. The `user_id` (called `subject` in some parts of our code) was used as being the trusted user ID. V2 token authZ/N session data is retrieved from the database using the `oidc_session_id` and `access_token_id` and in this case the `user_id` from the token is ignored and taken from the session data in the database. By truncating the token to 80 chars, the user_id is now missing from the cleartext of the v2 token. The back-end still accepts this for above reasons. This issue is not considered exploitable, but may look awkward when reproduced. The patch in versions 4.11.0 and 3.4.7 resolves the issue by verifying the `user_id` from the token against the session data from the database. No known workarounds are available.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
使用假设不可变数据进行的认证绕过
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
ZITADEL 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
ZITADEL是瑞士ZITADEL开源的一个 Auth0、Firebase Auth、AWS Cognito 以及为容器和无服务器时代构建的 Keycloak 的现代开源替代方案。 ZITADEL 2.31.0版本至3.4.7之前版本和4.11.0之前版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于令牌验证不当。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
zitadel zitadel >= 4.0.0, < 4.11.0 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-27840

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-27840

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · zitadel · 2026-02-26 · 3 CVEs total

CVE-2026-27945 ZITADEL has potential SSRF via Actions
CVE-2026-27946 ZITADEL Users Can Self-Verify Email/Phone via UpdateHumanUser API

IV. Related Vulnerabilities