Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1310 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-45912— ext4: don't cache extent during splitting extent

AI Predicted 5.5 Difficulty: Moderate EPSS 0.02% · P7

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1AI

T1564.008 · Email Hiding Rules

Affected Version Matrix 18

VendorProductVersion RangeStatus
LinuxLinux107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 8302b5b4aacdbb378f7b1216bb2ee782b5142415affected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 692103feca376ae4298c92aa8828015d20f1d87baffected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 4c2d9dac4d328244f9365b0a1fa27ec802821820affected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 93b2ebbbcb2e63cfc21a1946dfe91d3aa7952036affected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 96007fd3c106aea773c1afae2d6f64cceb6da208affected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 5b1f4290453314e11cd8e15c7baa8a9b76c19b23affected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 9a2b95cdaf07785e2739199037bd9c0863ccc1beaffected
107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024< 8b4b19a2f96348d70bfa306ef7d4a13b0bcbea79affected
… +10 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-45912

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
ext4: don't cache extent during splitting extent
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ext4: don't cache extent during splitting extent Caching extents during the splitting process is risky, as it may result in stale extents remaining in the status tree. Moreover, in most cases, the corresponding extent block entries are likely already cached before the split happens, making caching here not particularly useful. Assume we have an unwritten extent, and then DIO writes the first half. [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU] extent status tree |<- ->| ----> dio write this range First, when ext4_split_extent_at() splits this extent, it truncates the existing extent and then inserts a new one. During this process, this extent status entry may be shrunk, and calls to ext4_find_extent() and ext4_cache_extents() may occur, which could potentially insert the truncated range as a hole into the extent status tree. After the split is completed, this hole is not replaced with the correct status. [UUUUUUU|UUUUUUUU] on-disk extent U: unwritten extent [UUUUUUU|HHHHHHHH] extent status tree H: hole Then, the outer calling functions will not correct this remaining hole extent either. Finally, if we perform a delayed buffer write on this latter part, it will re-insert the delayed extent and cause an error in space accounting. In adition, if the unwritten extent cache is not shrunk during the splitting, ext4_cache_extents() also conflicts with existing extents when caching extents. In the future, we will add checks when caching extents, which will trigger a warning. Therefore, Do not cache extents that are being split.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于ext4文件系统在分裂extent过程中缓存extent,可能导致状态树中存在过时的extent条目。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
LinuxLinux 107a7bd31ac003e42c0f966aa8e5b26947de6024 ~ 8302b5b4aacdbb378f7b1216bb2ee782b5142415 -
LinuxLinux 3.12 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-45912

#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-45912

登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-45912 (8)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-05-27 · 276 CVEs total

CVE-2026-460399.8 CRITICALrxgk: Fix potential integer overflow in length check
CVE-2026-458989.8 CRITICALRDMA/iwcm: Fix workqueue list corruption by removing work_list
CVE-2026-459889.8 CRITICALrxrpc: Fix re-decryption of RESPONSE packets
CVE-2026-459729.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix potential UAF and double free in smb2_open_file()
CVE-2026-460439.1 CRITICALRDMA/rxe: Validate pad and ICRC before payload_size() in rxe_rcv
CVE-2026-460568.8 HIGHBluetooth: hci_event: fix potential UAF in SSP passkey handlers
CVE-2026-459458.8 HIGHiommu/vt-d: Fix race condition during PASID entry replacement
CVE-2026-458438.2 HIGHslip: bound decode() reads against the compressed packet length
CVE-2026-460378.2 HIGHipv4: icmp: validate reply type before using icmp_pointers
CVE-2026-460108.1 HIGHrxrpc: Fix error handling in rxgk_extract_token()
CVE-2026-460998.1 HIGHnet: ipv6: fix NOREF dst use in seg6 and rpl lwtunnels
CVE-2026-460767.9 HIGHKVM: nSVM: Raise #UD if unhandled VMMCALL isn't intercepted by L1
CVE-2026-458947.8 HIGHiommu/vt-d: Clear Present bit before tearing down PASID entry
CVE-2026-459597.8 HIGHcrypto: ccp - Fix a crash due to incorrect cleanup usage of kfree
CVE-2026-460117.8 HIGHmedia: mtk-jpeg: fix use-after-free in release path due to uncancelled work
CVE-2026-460157.8 HIGHtcp: call sk_data_ready() after listener migration
CVE-2026-458527.8 HIGHRDMA/rxe: Fix double free in rxe_srq_from_init
CVE-2026-458787.8 HIGHdrm/amdkfd: Fix watch_id bounds checking in debug address watch v2
CVE-2026-460587.8 HIGHmedia: amphion: Fix race between m2m job_abort and device_run
CVE-2026-458617.8 HIGHgfs2: Fix slab-use-after-free in qd_put

Showing top 20 of 276 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-45912

No comments yet


Leave a comment