CVE-2023-37582 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q: Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🏢 **Affected**: Apache RocketMQ. 📦 **Vendor**: Apache Software Foundation. 🔧 **Component**: Specifically the **NameServer** component. 📅 **Published**: July 12, 2023.

Q: Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

💣 **Public Exploits**: **YES**. 🔗 Multiple PoCs and Exploits are available on GitHub (e.g., CVE-2023-37582_EXPLOIT, Vulhub). 🌍 **Wild Exploitation**: High risk due to easy availability of tools.

Q: How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: 1️⃣ Scan for open **NameServer ports** (default 9876) on public IPs. 2️⃣ Verify if **permission verification** is enabled. 3️⃣ Use automated scanners to detect RocketMQ RCE patterns.

Q: Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Urgency**: **CRITICAL**. 🚨 **Priority**: **P0**. 💡 **Reason**: Unauthenticated RCE + Public Exploits + NameServer exposure is a common misconfiguration. Immediate patching or network isolation is required.

Updated May 06, 2026

This is a summary of the AI-generated 10-question deep analysis. The full version (longer answers, follow-up Q&A, related CVEs) requires login. Read the full analysis →

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

🚨 **Essence**: Apache RocketMQ has a critical code injection vulnerability.…

Read full answer (login)

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **CWE-94** (Code Injection). <br>🔍 **Flaw**: The NameServer component lacks proper permission verification.…

Read full answer (login)

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🏢 **Affected**: Apache RocketMQ. <br>📦 **Vendor**: Apache Software Foundation. <br>🔧 **Component**: Specifically the **NameServer** component. <br>📅 **Published**: July 12, 2023.

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

💀 **Attacker Capabilities**: <br>1️⃣ **Remote Command Execution (RCE)**: Run arbitrary commands on the host. <br>2️⃣ **Arbitrary File Write**: Overwrite system files.…

Read full answer (login)

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

⚖️ **Exploitation Threshold**: <br>✅ **Auth**: None required (Unauthenticated). <br>⚙️ **Config**: High risk if NameServer is exposed to the **public internet**.…

Read full answer (login)

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

💣 **Public Exploits**: **YES**. <br>🔗 Multiple PoCs and Exploits are available on GitHub (e.g., CVE-2023-37582_EXPLOIT, Vulhub). <br>🌍 **Wild Exploitation**: High risk due to easy availability of tools.

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: <br>1️⃣ Scan for open **NameServer ports** (default 9876) on public IPs. <br>2️⃣ Verify if **permission verification** is enabled. <br>3️⃣ Use automated scanners to detect RocketMQ RCE patterns.

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

🩹 **Official Fix**: **YES**. <br>⚠️ **Note**: The fix for CVE-2023-33246 (RCE) was incomplete for the NameServer. CVE-2023-37582 specifically addresses the NameServer vulnerability.…

Read full answer (login)

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

🚧 **Workaround (No Patch)**: <br>1️⃣ **Block Access**: Immediately restrict NameServer port (9876) from public internet access via Firewall/Security Group.…

Read full answer (login)

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Urgency**: **CRITICAL**. <br>🚨 **Priority**: **P0**. <br>💡 **Reason**: Unauthenticated RCE + Public Exploits + NameServer exposure is a common misconfiguration. Immediate patching or network isolation is required.

Continue exploring

Vulnerability detail Full AI analysis (login) Apache Software Foundation CWE-94