CVE-2024-31750 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q: What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

🚨 **Essence**: SQL Injection in **F-logic DataCube3 v.1.0**. 💥 **Consequences**: Attackers can steal sensitive data via the `req_id` parameter. Critical risk to measurement terminal systems.

Q: Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **SQL Injection (SQLi)**. 🔍 **Flaw**: Improper handling of the `req_id` parameter in the web interface/API.

Q: Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🏢 **Affected**: **F-logic DataCube3**. 📦 **Version**: Specifically **v.1.0**. 🌏 **Vendor**: F-logic (Japan). Small measurement terminal systems.

Q: What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

💀 **Attacker Actions**: Remote code execution via SQL. 📂 **Data Risk**: Obtain **sensitive information** from the database. 🔓 **Privileges**: Depends on DB user rights, but data exfiltration is confirmed.

Q: Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

⚡ **Threshold**: **Low**. 🌐 **Auth**: Likely Remote (implied by web parameter). ⚙️ **Config**: No specific auth bypass mentioned, but direct parameter manipulation is key.

Q: Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

📜 **Public Exp?**: **Yes**. 🔗 **PoC**: Available via **Nuclei Templates** (projectdiscovery) and **lampSEC** GitHub repo. 🔥 **Wild Exp**: Template-based scanning is active.

Q: How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for **DataCube3 v.1.0**. 🧪 **Test**: Inject payloads into `req_id` parameter. 🛠️ **Tool**: Use **Nuclei** with the specific CVE-2024-31750 template.

Q: Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

🩹 **Patch Status**: **Unknown/Not Listed**. ⚠️ **Note**: Data does not specify an official patch release date or version. Assume **unpatched** until confirmed.

Q: What if no patch? (Workaround)

🚧 **Workaround**: 1. **WAF**: Block SQL injection patterns in `req_id`. 2. **Network**: Restrict access to the terminal system. 3. **Input**: Sanitize/Validate `req_id` strictly.

Q: Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Urgency**: **HIGH**. 📅 **Published**: April 2024. ⚠️ **Priority**: Immediate scanning required. Public PoCs exist. Protect sensitive measurement data.

Updated May 06, 2026

This is a summary of the AI-generated 10-question deep analysis. The full version (longer answers, follow-up Q&A, related CVEs) requires login. Read the full analysis →

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

🚨 **Essence**: SQL Injection in **F-logic DataCube3 v.1.0**. <br>💥 **Consequences**: Attackers can steal sensitive data via the `req_id` parameter. Critical risk to measurement terminal systems.

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **SQL Injection (SQLi)**. <br>🔍 **Flaw**: Improper handling of the `req_id` parameter in the web interface/API.

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🏢 **Affected**: **F-logic DataCube3**. <br>📦 **Version**: Specifically **v.1.0**. <br>🌏 **Vendor**: F-logic (Japan). Small measurement terminal systems.

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

💀 **Attacker Actions**: Remote code execution via SQL. <br>📂 **Data Risk**: Obtain **sensitive information** from the database. <br>🔓 **Privileges**: Depends on DB user rights, but data exfiltration is confirmed.

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

⚡ **Threshold**: **Low**. <br>🌐 **Auth**: Likely Remote (implied by web parameter). <br>⚙️ **Config**: No specific auth bypass mentioned, but direct parameter manipulation is key.

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

📜 **Public Exp?**: **Yes**. <br>🔗 **PoC**: Available via **Nuclei Templates** (projectdiscovery) and **lampSEC** GitHub repo. <br>🔥 **Wild Exp**: Template-based scanning is active.

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for **DataCube3 v.1.0**. <br>🧪 **Test**: Inject payloads into `req_id` parameter. <br>🛠️ **Tool**: Use **Nuclei** with the specific CVE-2024-31750 template.

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

🩹 **Patch Status**: **Unknown/Not Listed**. <br>⚠️ **Note**: Data does not specify an official patch release date or version. Assume **unpatched** until confirmed.

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

🚧 **Workaround**: <br>1. **WAF**: Block SQL injection patterns in `req_id`. <br>2. **Network**: Restrict access to the terminal system. <br>3. **Input**: Sanitize/Validate `req_id` strictly.

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Urgency**: **HIGH**. <br>📅 **Published**: April 2024. <br>⚠️ **Priority**: Immediate scanning required. Public PoCs exist. Protect sensitive measurement data.

Continue exploring

Vulnerability detail Full AI analysis (login) n/a