CVE-2025-69222 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q: Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **CWE-918** (Server-Side Request Forgery). The **Actions** feature lacks input validation/restrictions in default configurations. ⚠️ It allows user-supplied URLs to be processed without proper checks.

Q: Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🎯 **Affected**: **LibreChat** by **danny-avila**. Specifically version **0.8.1-rc2**. 📦 Any instance running this specific release candidate is vulnerable.

Q: Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

🔐 **Exploitation Threshold**: **Medium**. Requires **Low Privileges** (PR:L) and **Low Complexity** (AC:L). No User Interaction (UI:N) needed. 🌐 Network accessible (AV:N).

Q: Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

🕵️ **Public Exploit**: **No**. The `pocs` field is empty. 🚫 No known public Proof-of-Concept or wild exploitation scripts are currently available.

Q: How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for **LibreChat v0.8.1-rc2**. 🧪 Check if the **Actions** feature is enabled. 📝 Look for endpoints allowing URL input without validation in the server logs.

Q: Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

✅ **Official Fix**: **Yes**. Patched in **v0.8.2-rc2**. 📥 Upgrade immediately. 🔗 See GitHub Advisory GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8 for details.

Q: What if no patch? (Workaround)

🛠️ **No Patch Workaround**: Disable the **Actions** feature if possible. 🚫 Restrict network access to the LibreChat server. 🛑 Implement WAF rules to block suspicious outbound requests from the server.

Q: Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

⚡ **Urgency**: **High Priority**. CVSS Score indicates **High Confidentiality** impact. 🚀 Upgrade to v0.8.2-rc2 ASAP to prevent potential data breaches via SSRF.

Updated May 06, 2026 CVSS 9.1 · Critical

This is a summary of the AI-generated 10-question deep analysis. The full version (longer answers, follow-up Q&A, related CVEs) requires login. Read the full analysis →

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

🚨 **Essence**: LibreChat v0.8.1-rc2 has a **Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)** flaw.…

Read full answer (login)

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **Root Cause**: **CWE-918** (Server-Side Request Forgery). The **Actions** feature lacks input validation/restrictions in default configurations. ⚠️ It allows user-supplied URLs to be processed without proper checks.

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🎯 **Affected**: **LibreChat** by **danny-avila**. Specifically version **0.8.1-rc2**. 📦 Any instance running this specific release candidate is vulnerable.

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

💀 **Attacker Capabilities**: With low privileges, hackers can perform **SSRF**.…

Read full answer (login)

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

🔐 **Exploitation Threshold**: **Medium**. Requires **Low Privileges** (PR:L) and **Low Complexity** (AC:L). No User Interaction (UI:N) needed. 🌐 Network accessible (AV:N).

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

🕵️ **Public Exploit**: **No**. The `pocs` field is empty. 🚫 No known public Proof-of-Concept or wild exploitation scripts are currently available.

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Self-Check**: Scan for **LibreChat v0.8.1-rc2**. 🧪 Check if the **Actions** feature is enabled. 📝 Look for endpoints allowing URL input without validation in the server logs.

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

✅ **Official Fix**: **Yes**. Patched in **v0.8.2-rc2**. 📥 Upgrade immediately. 🔗 See GitHub Advisory GHSA-rgjq-4q58-m3q8 for details.

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

🛠️ **No Patch Workaround**: Disable the **Actions** feature if possible. 🚫 Restrict network access to the LibreChat server. 🛑 Implement WAF rules to block suspicious outbound requests from the server.

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

⚡ **Urgency**: **High Priority**. CVSS Score indicates **High Confidentiality** impact. 🚀 Upgrade to v0.8.2-rc2 ASAP to prevent potential data breaches via SSRF.

Continue exploring

Vulnerability detail Full AI analysis (login) danny-avila CWE-918