CVE-2026-4370 — AI Deep Analysis Summary

Q: Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **CWE**: CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation). 🔍 **Flaw**: The internal Dqlite database cluster does not enforce correct TLS client and server identity verification. 🚫 Trust is assumed without proof.

Q: Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🏢 **Vendor**: Canonical. 📦 **Product**: Juju. 📅 **Affected Versions**: 3.2.0 to 3.6.19 AND 4.0 to 4.0.4. ⚠️ Check your version immediately!

Q: What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

🕵️ **Privileges**: Unauthenticated access. 🗄️ **Data Impact**: Full Read/Write access to the database. 📜 **Action**: Attackers can modify, delete, or exfiltrate any data stored in Juju's state. 🚨 Critical risk.

Q: Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

📉 **Threshold**: LOW. 🌐 **Network**: Network Accessible (AV:N). 🔑 **Auth**: None required (PR:N). 🤝 **User Interaction**: None (UI:N). 🚀 Easy to exploit remotely without credentials.

Q: Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

🚫 **Public Exp**: No PoC listed in data. 📂 **References**: GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p) exists. ⚠️ Wild exploitation likely imminent due to low barrier.

Q: How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Check**: Scan for Juju versions 3.2.0-3.6.19 & 4.0-4.0.4. 📡 **Feature**: Look for Dqlite clusters with weak TLS config. 🛠️ **Tool**: Use vulnerability scanners detecting CWE-295 in Juju deployments.

Q: Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

✅ **Fixed**: Yes. 📦 **Patch**: Upgrade to Juju > 3.6.19 or > 4.0.4. 🔗 **Source**: Canonical Security Advisories. 🔄 Immediate update required.

Q: What if no patch? (Workaround)

🛑 **Workaround**: Isolate Dqlite nodes. 🔒 **Network**: Restrict access to Dqlite ports via firewall. 🚫 **Auth**: Enforce strict network segmentation if patching is delayed. ⏳ Temporary fix only.

Q: Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Priority**: CRITICAL. 📊 **CVSS**: 9.8 (High). 🚨 **Urgency**: Patch NOW. ⚡ Unauthenticated remote code/data access is a top-tier threat. Do not delay.

Updated May 06, 2026 CVSS 10.0 · Critical

This is a summary of the AI-generated 10-question deep analysis. The full version (longer answers, follow-up Q&A, related CVEs) requires login. Read the full analysis →

Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)

🚨 **Essence**: Juju's internal Dqlite cluster fails TLS auth. 📉 **Consequences**: Unauthenticated attackers join the cluster, gaining full read/write access to the underlying database.…

Read full answer (login)

Q2Root Cause? (CWE/Flaw)

🛡️ **CWE**: CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation). 🔍 **Flaw**: The internal Dqlite database cluster does not enforce correct TLS client and server identity verification. 🚫 Trust is assumed without proof.

Q3Who is affected? (Versions/Components)

🏢 **Vendor**: Canonical. 📦 **Product**: Juju. 📅 **Affected Versions**: 3.2.0 to 3.6.19 AND 4.0 to 4.0.4. ⚠️ Check your version immediately!

Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)

🕵️ **Privileges**: Unauthenticated access. 🗄️ **Data Impact**: Full Read/Write access to the database. 📜 **Action**: Attackers can modify, delete, or exfiltrate any data stored in Juju's state. 🚨 Critical risk.

Q5Is exploitation threshold high? (Auth/Config)

📉 **Threshold**: LOW. 🌐 **Network**: Network Accessible (AV:N). 🔑 **Auth**: None required (PR:N). 🤝 **User Interaction**: None (UI:N). 🚀 Easy to exploit remotely without credentials.

Q6Is there a public Exp? (PoC/Wild Exploitation)

🚫 **Public Exp**: No PoC listed in data. 📂 **References**: GitHub Security Advisory (GHSA-gvrj-cjch-728p) exists. ⚠️ Wild exploitation likely imminent due to low barrier.

Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)

🔍 **Check**: Scan for Juju versions 3.2.0-3.6.19 & 4.0-4.0.4. 📡 **Feature**: Look for Dqlite clusters with weak TLS config. 🛠️ **Tool**: Use vulnerability scanners detecting CWE-295 in Juju deployments.

Q8Is it fixed officially? (Patch/Mitigation)

✅ **Fixed**: Yes. 📦 **Patch**: Upgrade to Juju > 3.6.19 or > 4.0.4. 🔗 **Source**: Canonical Security Advisories. 🔄 Immediate update required.

Q9What if no patch? (Workaround)

🛑 **Workaround**: Isolate Dqlite nodes. 🔒 **Network**: Restrict access to Dqlite ports via firewall. 🚫 **Auth**: Enforce strict network segmentation if patching is delayed. ⏳ Temporary fix only.

Q10Is it urgent? (Priority Suggestion)

🔥 **Priority**: CRITICAL. 📊 **CVSS**: 9.8 (High). 🚨 **Urgency**: Patch NOW. ⚡ Unauthenticated remote code/data access is a top-tier threat. Do not delay.

Continue exploring

Vulnerability detail Full AI analysis (login) Canonical CWE-295