This is a summary of the AI-generated 10-question deep analysis. The full version (longer answers, follow-up Q&A, related CVEs) requires login. Read the full analysis โ
Q1What is this vulnerability? (Essence + Consequences)
๐จ **Essence**: A critical SQL Injection flaw in **ormar** (Python ORM). <br>๐ฅ **Consequences**: Attackers can bypass security controls, leading to **full data theft**, **modification**, or **system destruction**.โฆ
๐ก๏ธ **CWE-89**: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command. <br>๐ **Flaw**: The `min()` and `max()` methods fail to validate **user-supplied column names**.โฆ
๐ฆ **Vendor**: collerek. <br>๐ **Affected**: **ormar versions 0.22.0 and earlier**. <br>โ **Fixed**: Version **0.23.0** and later are safe.
Q4What can hackers do? (Privileges/Data)
๐ **Privileges**: **High**. The vulnerability allows arbitrary SQL execution. <br>๐พ **Data**: Full **Read/Write/Delete** access to the database.โฆ
๐ฃ **Public Exploit**: **YES**. <br>๐ **PoC Available**: A Proof-of-Concept is hosted on GitHub (`blackhatlegend/CVE-2026-26198`). <br>โ ๏ธ **Risk**: Wild exploitation is highly likely given the simplicity of the flaw.
Q7How to self-check? (Features/Scanning)
๐ **Self-Check**: Scan your codebase for usage of `ormar.min()` or `ormar.max()`. <br>๐ **Indicator**: Check if column names are passed as **dynamic variables** from user input without strict whitelisting.โฆ