Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1914

1914 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Availability Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Implementation Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-48725 QuTS hero — QuTS hero 8.1 - 2026-02-11
CVE-2025-52868 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1 - 2026-02-11
CVE-2025-52869 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1AI Critical AI 2026-02-11
CVE-2025-52870 Qsync Central — Qsync Central 9.1AI Critical AI 2026-02-11
CVE-2026-2203 Tenda AC8 Embedded Httpd Service fast_setting_wifi_set buffer overflow — AC8 8.8 High 2026-02-09
CVE-2026-2202 Tenda AC8 httpd WifiGuestSet fromSetWifiGusetBasic buffer overflow — AC8 8.8 High 2026-02-09
CVE-2026-2140 Tenda TX9 setMacFilterCfg sub_4223E0 buffer overflow — TX9 8.8 High 2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2139 Tenda TX9 fast_setting_wifi_set sub_432580 buffer overflow — TX9 8.8 High 2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2138 Tenda TX9 SetStaticRouteCfg sub_42D03C buffer overflow — TX9 8.8 High 2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2137 Tenda TX3 SetIpMacBind buffer overflow — TX3 8.8 High 2026-02-08
CVE-2026-2086 UTT HiPER 810G Management formFireWall strcpy buffer overflow — HiPER 810G 8.8 High 2026-02-07
CVE-2026-2071 UTT 进取 520W formP2PLimitConfig strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High 2026-02-07
CVE-2020-37171 TapinRadio 2.12.3 - 'username' Denial of Service — TapinRadio 6.2 Medium 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37170 TapinRadio 2.12.3 - 'address' Denial of Service — TapinRadio 6.2 Medium 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37165 AbsoluteTelnet 11.12 - "license name" Denial of Service — AbsoluteTelnet 6.2 Medium 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37166 AbsoluteTelnet 11.12 - 'SSH2/username' Denial of Service — AbsoluteTelnet 6.2 Medium 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37164 AbsoluteTelnet 11.12 - "license entry" Denial of Service — AbsoluteTelnet 6.2 Medium 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37155 Core FTP Lite 1.3 - Denial of Service (PoC) — Core FTP Lite 7.5 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37109 aSc TimeTables 2020.11.4 - Denial of Service — aSc TimeTables 7.5 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37107 Core FTP LE 2.2 - Denial of Service — Core FTP LE 7.5 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2070 UTT 进取 520W formPolicyRouteConf strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2068 UTT 进取 520W formSyslogConf strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2067 UTT 进取 520W formTimeGroupConfig strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2026-2066 UTT 进取 520W formIpGroupConfig strcpy buffer overflow — 进取 520W 8.8 High 2026-02-06
CVE-2020-37131 Product Key Explorer 4.2.2.0 - 'Key' Denial of Service — Product Key Explorer 6.2 Medium 2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37130 Nsauditor 3.2.0.0 - 'Name' Denial of Service — Nsauditor 7.5 High 2026-02-05
CVE-2020-37074 Remote Desktop Audit 2.3.0.157 - Buffer Overflow (SEH) — Remote Desktop Audit 9.8 Critical 2026-02-03
CVE-2020-37075 LanSend 3.2 - Buffer Overflow (SEH) — LanSend 9.8 Critical 2026-02-03
CVE-2020-37070 CloudMe 1.11.2 - Buffer Overflow (SEH,DEP,ASLR) — CloudMe 9.8 Critical 2026-02-03
CVE-2020-37069 Konica Minolta FTP Utility 1.0 - 'NLST' Denial of Service — FTP Utility 9.8 Critical 2026-02-03

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1914 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.