Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) — Vulnerability Class 1914

1914 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-120 represents a critical memory safety vulnerability where software copies data into a fixed-size buffer without validating the input’s length against the destination’s capacity. This classic buffer overflow occurs when an attacker supplies input exceeding the allocated memory space, causing data to spill into adjacent memory regions. Exploitation typically involves injecting malicious code or altering program control flow, such as overwriting return addresses to execute arbitrary commands. Developers prevent this weakness by implementing rigorous bounds checking before any copy operation, ensuring the input size never exceeds the buffer’s limits. Utilizing safer, language-specific functions that automatically handle size verification, or adopting modern programming languages with built-in memory safety features, effectively mitigates this risk and preserves application integrity against memory corruption attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product copies an input buffer to an output buffer without verifying that the size of the input buffer is less than the size of the output buffer.
Common Consequences (2)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy. This can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Availability Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the product into an infinite loop.
Mitigations (5)
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Implementation Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that your buffer is as large as you specify. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer i…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Examples (2)
The following code asks the user to enter their last name and then attempts to store the value entered in the last_name array.
char last_name[20]; printf ("Enter your last name: "); scanf ("%s", last_name);
Bad · C
The following code attempts to create a local copy of a buffer to perform some manipulations to the data.
void manipulate_string(char * string){ char buf[24]; strcpy(buf, string); ... }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-10942 H3C Magic B3 aspForm EditMacList buffer overflow — Magic B3 8.8 High 2025-09-25
CVE-2025-20149 Cisco IOS和Cisco IOS XE 安全漏洞 — IOS 6.5 Medium 2025-09-24
CVE-2025-21481 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in HLOS — Snapdragon 7.8 High 2025-09-24
CVE-2025-21476 Buffer Copy Without Checking Size of Input in Computer Vision — Snapdragon 7.8 High 2025-09-24
CVE-2025-9962 Unauthenticated Buffer Overflow — P series (P07, P10, P12, P15) 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-09-23
CVE-2025-10838 Tenda AC21 WifiExtraSet sub_45BB10 buffer overflow — AC21 8.8 High 2025-09-23
CVE-2025-10815 Tenda AC20 HTTP POST Request SetPptpServerCfg strcpy buffer overflow — AC20 8.8 High 2025-09-22
CVE-2025-8892 PRT File Parsing Memory Corruption Vulnerability — Shared Components 7.8 High 2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10803 Tenda AC23 HTTP POST Request SetPptpServerCfg sscanf buffer overflow — AC23 8.8 High 2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10792 D-Link DIR-513 formWPS buffer overflow — DIR-513 8.8 High 2025-09-22
CVE-2025-10757 UTT 1200GW formConfigDnsFilterGlobal buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High 2025-09-20
CVE-2025-10756 UTT HiPER 840G getOneApConfTempEntry buffer overflow — HiPER 840G 8.8 High 2025-09-20
CVE-2025-10666 D-Link DIR-825 apply.cgi sub_4106d4 buffer overflow — DIR-825 8.8 High 2025-09-18
CVE-2025-10443 Tenda AC9/AC15 exeCommand formexeCommand buffer overflow — AC9 8.8 High 2025-09-15
CVE-2025-10385 Mercury KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 mcr_setSysAdm sub_450B2C buffer overflow — KM08-708H GiGA WiFi Wave2 8.8 High 2025-09-14
CVE-2025-10172 UTT 750W formPictureUrl buffer overflow — 750W 8.8 High 2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10171 UTT 1250GW formConfigApConfTemp sub_453DC buffer overflow — 1250GW 8.8 High 2025-09-09
CVE-2025-49458 Zoom Workplace Clients - Buffer Overflow — Zoom Workplace Clients 6.5 Medium 2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10170 UTT 1200GW formApLbConfig sub_4B48F8 buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High 2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10169 UTT 1200GW ConfigWirelessBase buffer overflow — 1200GW 8.8 High 2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10120 Tenda AC20 GetParentControlInfo strcpy buffer overflow — AC20 8.8 High 2025-09-09
CVE-2025-10034 D-Link DIR-825 httpd ping6_response.cg get_ping6_app_stat buffer overflow — DIR-825 8.8 High 2025-09-06
CVE-2025-9961 Authenticated RCE by CWMP binary — AX10 V1/V1.2/V2/V2.6/V3/V3.6 7.5AI High AI 2025-09-06
CVE-2025-9813 Tenda CH22 SetSambaConf formSetSambaConf buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High 2025-09-02
CVE-2025-9812 Tenda CH22 exeCommand formexeCommand buffer overflow — CH22 8.8 High 2025-09-02
CVE-2025-9783 TOTOLINK A702R formParentControl sub_418030 buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High 2025-09-01
CVE-2025-9782 TOTOLINK A702R formOneKeyAccessButton sub_4466F8 buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High 2025-09-01
CVE-2025-9781 TOTOLINK A702R formFilter sub_4162DC buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High 2025-09-01
CVE-2025-9780 TOTOLINK A702R formIpQoS sub_419BE0 buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High 2025-09-01
CVE-2025-9779 TOTOLINK A702R formFilter sub_4162DC buffer overflow — A702R 8.8 High 2025-09-01

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-120 (未进行输入大小检查的缓冲区拷贝(传统缓冲区溢出)) represent 1914 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.