Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 3232

3232 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
Availability Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and Design Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
Implementation Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2020-27281 Delta Electronics CNCSoft ScreenEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Electronics CNCSoft ScreenEditor 7.8 - 2021-01-11
CVE-2020-25844 CHANGING Inc. NHIServiSignAdapter Windows Versions - Stack Overflow — NHIServiSignAdapter 8.1 High 2020-12-31
CVE-2020-7845 Jiransecurity Spamsniper Stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability — Spamsniper 8.1 High 2020-12-27
CVE-2020-7837 Infraware Polaris ML Report Program 缓冲区错误漏洞 — ML Report 7.5 High 2020-12-16
CVE-2020-25177 Wecon Technologies WECON Technologies PLC Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WECON PLC Editor 8.8 - 2020-12-01
CVE-2020-25159 Real Time Automation EtherNet/IP — 499ES EtherNet/IP (ENIP) Adaptor Source Code 9.8 - 2020-11-24
CVE-2020-25189 Paradox IP150 缓冲区错误漏洞 — IP150 9.8 - 2020-11-21
CVE-2020-27347 tmux stack buffer overflow in function input_csi_dispatch_sgr_colon — tmux 8.8 High 2020-11-06
CVE-2020-9748 Stack overflow vulnerability in Adobe Animate 20.5 — Animate 7.8 High 2020-10-21
CVE-2020-1664 Junos OS: Buffer overflow vulnerability in device control daemon — Junos OS 7.8 High 2020-10-16
CVE-2020-17413 mPDF和Foxit PhantomPDF 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PhantomPDF 7.8 - 2020-10-13
CVE-2020-17407 Microhard Bullet-LTE 安全漏洞 — Bullet-LTE 9.8 - 2020-10-13
CVE-2020-16234 FATEK Automation PLC WinProladder — PLC WinProladder 7.8 - 2020-09-30
CVE-2020-14393 Gentoo 缓冲区错误漏洞 — perl-dbi 7.1 - 2020-09-16
CVE-2020-9725 FrameMaker File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow — FrameMaker 7.8 High 2020-09-10
CVE-2020-2042 PAN-OS: Buffer overflow in the management web interface — PAN-OS 7.2 High 2020-09-09
CVE-2020-14498 HMS Industrial Networks AB eCatcher Stack-based Buffer Overflow — eCatcher 9.6 Critical 2020-08-26
CVE-2020-8869 Foxit Studio Photo 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Studio Photo 8.8 - 2020-08-19
CVE-2020-15635 NETGEAR R6700 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R6700 8.8 - 2020-08-19
CVE-2020-15636 多款NETGEAR产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — Multiple Routers 9.8 - 2020-08-19
CVE-2020-16221 Delta Electronics TPEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Electronics TPEditor 7.8 - 2020-08-06
CVE-2020-16215 Advantech WebAccess HMI Designer 输入验证错误漏洞 — Advantech WebAccess HMI Designer 7.8 - 2020-08-06
CVE-2020-16199 Delta Electronics CNCSoft ScreenEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft ScreenEditor 7.8 - 2020-08-04
CVE-2020-15416 NETGEAR R6700 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R6700 8.8 - 2020-07-28
CVE-2020-15417 NETGEAR R6700 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R6700 8.8 - 2020-07-28
CVE-2020-10924 NETGEAR R6700 缓冲区错误漏洞 — R6700 8.0 - 2020-07-28
CVE-2020-14511 Moxa EDR-G902和EDR-G903 缓冲区错误漏洞 — EDR-G902 and EDR-G903 Series Routers 9.8 - 2020-07-15
CVE-2020-12497 Phoenix Contact Automation Worx <= 1.87: stack-based overflow — Automation Worx 7.8 High 2020-07-01
CVE-2020-12498 Phoenix Contact Automation Worx <= 1.87: out-of-bounds read remote code execution — Automation Worx 7.8 High 2020-07-01
CVE-2020-4044 Local users can perform a buffer overflow attack against the xrdp-sesman service and then impersonate it — xrdp 7.5 High 2020-06-30

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 3232 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.