Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 3224

3224 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
Availability Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and Design Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
Implementation Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2019-11931 Facebook WhatsApp 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WhatsApp for Android 7.8 - 2019-11-14
CVE-2019-15683 TurboVNC 缓冲区错误漏洞 — TurboVNC 8.8 - 2019-10-29
CVE-2019-17145 Foxit PhantomPDF 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PhantomPDF 8.8 - 2019-10-25
CVE-2019-3729 Dell RSA BSAFE Micro Edition Suite 缓冲区错误漏洞 — RSA BSAFE MES 2.4 - 2019-09-30
CVE-2019-13556 Advantech WebAccess 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WebAccess 8.8 - 2019-09-18
CVE-2019-13548 3S-Smart Software Solutions CODESYS V3 web server 缓冲区错误漏洞 — CODESYS V3 web server 9.8 - 2019-09-13
CVE-2019-13540 Delta Electronics TPEditor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — TPEditor 7.8 - 2019-09-11
CVE-2019-13518 EZAutomation EZ Touch Editor 缓冲区错误漏洞 — EZ Touch Editor 7.8 - 2019-09-04
CVE-2019-13156 Naver Cloud Explorer 缓冲区错误漏洞 — NDrive 7.5 - 2019-09-03
CVE-2019-5041 Aspose Aspose.Words 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Aspose 8.8 - 2019-08-21
CVE-2019-5038 Nest Labs Openweave-core Weave工具缓冲区错误漏洞 — Nest Labs 7.8 - 2019-08-20
CVE-2019-13520 Fuji Electric Alpha5 Smart Loader 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Alpha5 Smart Loader 7.8 - 2019-08-20
CVE-2014-8184 Liblouis 缓冲区错误漏洞 — liblouis 7.8 - 2019-08-02
CVE-2019-10974 NREL EnergyPlus 缓冲区错误漏洞 — EnergyPlus - - 2019-07-25
CVE-2019-0053 Junos OS: Insufficient validation of environment variables in telnet client may lead to stack-based buffer overflow — Junos OS 7.8 - 2019-07-11
CVE-2019-10193 Redis hyperloglog data structure 缓冲区错误漏洞 — redis 7.2 - 2019-07-11
CVE-2019-10164 PostgreSQL 缓冲区错误漏洞 — PostgreSQL 8.8 - 2019-06-26
CVE-2018-20655 Facebook WhatsApp和WhatsApp Business 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WhatsApp for iOS 9.8 - 2019-06-14
CVE-2018-6339 Facebook WhatsApp Business 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WhatsApp for Android 9.1 - 2019-06-14
CVE-2018-6349 Facebook WhatsApp和WhatsApp Business 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WhatsApp for Android 9.8 - 2019-06-14
CVE-2019-10967 Emerson Electric Ovation OCR400 Controller 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Emerson Ovation OCR400 Controller 8.8 - 2019-05-28
CVE-2015-1006 多款Opto 22产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — PAC Project Professional 9.8 - 2019-05-10
CVE-2019-10954 Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5370 Stack-based Buffer Overflow — CompactLogix 5370 L1 controllers 7.5 - 2019-05-01
CVE-2019-3930 多款路由器缓冲区错误漏洞 — Crestron AirMedia, Barco WePresent, Extron ShareLink, Teq AV IT WIPS710, SHARP PN-L703WA, Optoma WPS-Pro, Blackbox HD WPS, InFocus LiteShow3, and InFocus LiteShow4. 9.8 - 2019-04-30
CVE-2019-10947 Delta Electronics Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Delta Industrial Automation CNCSoft 7.8 - 2019-04-17
CVE-2019-0008 QFX5000 Series, EX4300, EX4600: A stack buffer overflow vulnerability in Packet Forwarding Engine manager (FXPC) process — Junos OS 9.8 - 2019-04-10
CVE-2019-6550 Advantech WebAccess/SCADA 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WebAccess/SCADA 9.8 - 2019-04-05
CVE-2019-6553 Rockwell Automation RSLinx Classic 缓冲区错误漏洞 — RSLinx Classic 9.8 - 2019-04-04
CVE-2014-9189 Honeywell International Experion PKS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Experion PKS 9.8 - 2019-03-25
CVE-2015-1007 多款Opto 22产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — PAC Project Professional 7.8 - 2019-03-25

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 3224 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.