Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 3240

3240 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
Availability Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and Design Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
Implementation Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2022-43613 Corel CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 安全漏洞 — CorelDRAW Graphics Suite 7.8 - 2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43622 D-Link DIR-1935 安全漏洞 — DIR-1935 8.8 - 2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43625 D-Link DIR-1935 安全漏洞 — DIR-1935 6.8 - 2023-03-29
CVE-2022-43630 D-Link DIR-1935 安全漏洞 — DIR-1935 8.8 - 2023-03-29
CVE-2022-0194 Netatalk 安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2022-0650 TP-Link TL-WR940N 缓冲区错误漏洞 — TL-WR940N 8.0 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2022-23122 Netatalk 安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2022-23125 Netatalk 安全漏洞 — Netatalk 9.8 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2022-24673 Canon imageCLASS MF644Cdw 10.02 printers 缓冲区错误漏洞 — imageCLASS MF644Cdw 9.8 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2022-24674 Canon imageCLASS MF644Cdw 10.02 printers缓冲区错误漏洞 — imageCLASS MF644Cdw 8.8 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2022-24973 TP-Link TL-WR940N 安全漏洞 — TL-WR940N 8.0 - 2023-03-28
CVE-2023-26337 ZDI-CAN-20285: Adobe Dimension USDA File Parsing Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Dimension 7.8 High 2023-03-28
CVE-2023-1646 IObit Malware Fighter IOCTL IMFCameraProtect.sys 0x8018E004 stack-based overflow — Malware Fighter 5.3 Medium 2023-03-26
CVE-2023-27590 Rizin has stack-based buffer overflow when parsing GDB registers profile files — rizin 7.8 High 2023-03-14
CVE-2023-27406 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 7.8 High 2023-03-14
CVE-2023-27404 Siemens Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Tecnomatix Plant Simulation 7.8 High 2023-03-14
CVE-2023-27498 Memory Corruption vulnerability in SAP Host Agent (SAPOSCOL) — Host Agent (SAPOSCOL) 7.2 High 2023-03-14
CVE-2022-33260 Stack based buffer overflow in Core — Snapdragon 5.9 Medium 2023-03-07
CVE-2022-33213 Memory Corruption in MODEM — Snapdragon 7.5 High 2023-03-07
CVE-2023-0330 Qemu: lsi53c895a: dma reentrancy issue leads to stack overflow 5.3 Medium 2023-03-06
CVE-2023-20078 Cisco IP Phone 6800, 7800, 7900, and 8800 Series Web UI Vulnerabilities — Cisco IP Phones with Multiplatform Firmware 9.8 Critical 2023-03-03
CVE-2023-20079 Cisco IP Phone 6800, 7800, 7900, and 8800 Series Web UI Vulnerabilities — Cisco IP Phones with Multiplatform Firmware 9.8 Critical 2023-03-03
CVE-2023-0656 SonicWALL SonicOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — SonicOS 7.5 - 2023-03-02
CVE-2023-22226 Adobe Bridge SVG file Stack-based Buffer Overflow Arbitrary code execution — Bridge 7.8 High 2023-02-17
CVE-2023-22234 Adobe Premiere Rush PSD file Stack-based Buffer Overflow Arbitrary code execution — Premiere Rush 7.8 High 2023-02-17
CVE-2023-22243 Adobe Animate SVG file Stack-based Buffer Overflow Arbitrary code execution — Animate 7.8 High 2023-02-17
CVE-2022-30306 Fortinet FortiWeb 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiWeb 6.3 Medium 2023-02-16
CVE-2022-33871 Fortinet FortiWeb 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiWeb 6.3 Medium 2023-02-16
CVE-2023-23781 Fortinet FortiWeb 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiWeb 6.1 Medium 2023-02-16
CVE-2023-23780 Fortinet FortiWeb 缓冲区错误漏洞 — FortiWeb 7.6 High 2023-02-16

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 3240 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.