Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) — Vulnerability Class 3235

3235 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-121 represents a critical memory safety weakness where program data exceeds the allocated bounds of a stack-allocated buffer, corrupting adjacent memory structures. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious payloads that overwrite the function’s return address or saved frame pointer, thereby hijacking control flow to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the compromised process. This exploitation is particularly dangerous because stack buffers are local variables, making the attack surface common in low-level languages like C and C++. Developers mitigate this risk by enforcing strict input validation, utilizing safe string handling functions that prevent unbounded writes, and adopting modern programming languages with automatic memory management. Additionally, implementing compiler-level protections such as stack canaries and Address Space Layout Randomization significantly raises the barrier for successful exploitation, ensuring system integrity remains intact against buffer overflow attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
A stack-based buffer overflow condition is a condition where the buffer being overwritten is allocated on the stack (i.e., is a local variable or, rarely, a parameter to a function).
Common Consequences (3)
Availability Modify Memory, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
Mitigations (5)
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Architecture and Design Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
Implementation Do not use dangerous functions such as gets. Use safer, equivalent functions which check for boundary errors.
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Examples (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, stack-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char buf[BUFSIZE]; strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
void host_lookup(char *user_supplied_addr){ struct hostent *hp; in_addr_t *addr; char hostname[64]; in_addr_t inet_addr(const char *cp); /*routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion */ validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr); addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr); hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET); strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2021-46638 Bentley Systems MicroStation 安全漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 - 2022-02-18
CVE-2021-46585 Bentley Systems MicroStation 安全漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 - 2022-02-18
CVE-2021-46565 Bentley Systems MicroStation 安全漏洞 — MicroStation CONNECT 7.8 - 2022-02-18
CVE-2022-0629 Stack-based Buffer Overflow in vim/vim — vim/vim 7.8 - 2022-02-17
CVE-2022-23804 KiCad Eda 缓冲区错误漏洞 — KiCad 7.8 - 2022-02-16
CVE-2022-23803 KiCad Eda 缓冲区错误漏洞 — KiCad 7.8 - 2022-02-16
CVE-2021-43299 Pjsua Api 缓冲区错误漏洞 — pjsip 9.8 - 2022-02-16
CVE-2021-43300 Pjsua Api 缓冲区错误漏洞 — pjsip 9.8 - 2022-02-16
CVE-2021-43301 Pjsua Api 缓冲区错误漏洞 — pjsip 9.8 - 2022-02-16
CVE-2022-20699 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20700 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20701 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20702 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20703 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20704 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20705 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20706 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20707 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20708 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20709 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20710 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20711 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20712 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2022-20749 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 10.0 Critical 2022-02-10
CVE-2021-46158 Siemens Simcenter Femap 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Simcenter Femap V2020.2 7.8 - 2022-02-09
CVE-2021-46155 Siemens Simcenter Femap 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Simcenter Femap V2020.2 7.8 - 2022-02-09
CVE-2021-46154 Siemens Simcenter Femap 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Simcenter Femap V2020.2 7.8 - 2022-02-09
CVE-2021-21961 Sealevel Systems SeaConnect 370W 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Sealevel 10.0 - 2022-02-04
CVE-2021-21960 Sealevel Systems SeaConnect 370W 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Sealevel 10.0 - 2022-02-04
CVE-2022-23947 Kicad 缓冲区错误漏洞 — KiCad 7.8 - 2022-02-04

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-121 (栈缓冲区溢出) represent 3235 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.