目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CWE-122 堆缓冲区溢出 类漏洞列表 2701

CWE-122 堆缓冲区溢出 类弱点 2701 条 CVE 漏洞汇总,含 AI 中文分析。

CWE-122 堆缓冲区溢出属于内存安全漏洞,指写入数据超出在堆内存(如通过 malloc 分配)中分配的缓冲区边界。攻击者利用此漏洞可覆盖相邻内存数据,导致程序崩溃或执行任意代码,从而获取系统控制权。开发者应避免此类风险,需严格验证输入长度,确保写入操作不超出缓冲区上限,并使用现代安全语言或库来自动管理内存边界。

MITRE CWE 官方描述
CWE:CWE-122 基于堆的缓冲区溢出(Heap-based Buffer Overflow) 英文:堆溢出(Heap overflow)条件是一种缓冲区溢出(Buffer overflow),其中可被覆盖的缓冲区(Buffer)是在内存的堆(Heap)部分分配的,通常意味着该缓冲区是使用 malloc() 等例程分配的。
常见影响 (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
Buffer overflows generally lead to crashes. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Modify Memory
Buffer overflows often can be used to execute arbitrary code, which is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy. Besides important user data, heap-based overflows can be used to overwrite function pointers that may be living in memory, pointing it to the attacker's code. Eve…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control, Other Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
When the consequence is arbitrary code execution, this can often be used to subvert any other security service.
缓解措施 (5)
Pre-design: Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design Use an abstraction library to abstract away risky APIs. Not a complete solution.
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Implementation Implement and perform bounds checking on input.
代码示例 (2)
While buffer overflow examples can be rather complex, it is possible to have very simple, yet still exploitable, heap-based buffer overflows:
#define BUFSIZE 256 int main(int argc, char **argv) { char *buf; buf = (char *)malloc(sizeof(char)*BUFSIZE); strcpy(buf, argv[1]); }
Bad · C
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
char * copy_input(char *user_supplied_string){ int i, dst_index; char *dst_buf = (char*)malloc(4*sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE); if ( MAX_SIZE <= strlen(user_supplied_string) ){ die("user string too long, die evil hacker!"); } dst_index = 0; for ( i = 0; i < strlen(user_supplied_string); i++ ){ if( '&' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ dst_buf[dst_index++] = '&'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p'; dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';'; } else if ('<' == user_supplied_string[i] ){ /* encode to &lt; */ } else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i]; } return ds
Bad · C
CVE ID 标题 CVSS 风险等级 Published
CVE-2021-36054 Adobe XMP Toolkit SDK 缓冲区错误漏洞 — XMP Toolkit 3.3 Low 2021-09-01
CVE-2021-36050 Adobe XMP Toolkit SDK 缓冲区错误漏洞 — XMP Toolkit 7.8 - 2021-09-01
CVE-2021-33007 Delta Electronics TPEditor 安全漏洞 — Delta Electronics TPEditor 7.8 - 2021-08-30
CVE-2021-28629 Adobe Animate 安全漏洞 — Animate 7.8 - 2021-08-24
CVE-2021-28620 Adobe Animate 安全漏洞 — Animate 7.8 - 2021-08-24
CVE-2021-28608 Adobe After Effects 缓冲区错误漏洞 — After Effects 7.8 - 2021-08-24
CVE-2021-28610 Adobe After Effects 缓冲区错误漏洞 — After Effects 7.8 High 2021-08-24
CVE-2021-28603 Adobe After Effects 缓冲区错误漏洞 — After Effects 7.8 - 2021-08-24
CVE-2021-28604 Adobe After Effects 缓冲区错误漏洞 — After Effects 7.8 - 2021-08-24
CVE-2021-28638 Adobe Acrobat 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Acrobat Reader 7.8 High 2021-08-20
CVE-2021-28624 Adobe Photoshop 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Bridge 7.8 High 2021-08-20
CVE-2021-21825 AT&T Labs Xmill 缓冲区错误漏洞 — AT&T 9.8 - 2021-08-18
CVE-2021-21810 AT&T Labs Xmill 缓冲区错误漏洞 — AT&T Labs 9.8 - 2021-08-17
CVE-2021-21829 AT&T Labs Xmill 缓冲区错误漏洞 — AT&T 9.8 - 2021-08-13
CVE-2021-21830 AT&T Labs Xmill 缓冲区错误漏洞 — AT&T 9.8 - 2021-08-13
CVE-2021-24036 Facebook HHVM 输入验证错误漏洞 — folly 9.8 - 2021-07-23
CVE-2021-34329 Siemens JT2GO和Siemens Teamcenter Visualization 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2021-34328 Siemens JT2GO 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2021-34327 Siemens JT2GO 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2021-34326 Siemens Jt2go 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2021-34317 Siemens JT2GO 和 Siemens Teamcenter Visualization 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2021-34313 Siemens Jt2go 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2021-34312 Siemens JT2GO 和 Siemens Teamcenter Visualization 缓冲区错误漏洞 — JT2Go 7.8 - 2021-07-13
CVE-2020-28598 PrusaSlicer 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Prusa Research 7.8 - 2021-07-08
CVE-2021-33000 Advantech WebAccess HMI Designer 缓冲区错误漏洞 — WebAccess HMI Designer 7.8 - 2021-06-24
CVE-2021-21572 Dell BIOSConnect feature 缓冲区错误漏洞 — BIOSConnect 7.2 High 2021-06-24
CVE-2021-31485 OpenText Brava! 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Brava! Desktop 7.8 - 2021-06-15
CVE-2021-31483 OpenText Brava! 安全漏洞 — Brava! Desktop 7.8 - 2021-06-15
CVE-2021-31478 OpenText Brava! 安全漏洞 — Brava! Desktop 7.8 - 2021-06-15
CVE-2021-21554 Dell PowerEdge 多款产品缓冲区错误漏洞 — PowerEdge BIOS Intel 15G 6.1 Medium 2021-06-14

CWE-122(堆缓冲区溢出) 是常见的弱点类别,本平台收录该类弱点关联的 2701 条 CVE 漏洞。