Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-125 (跨界内存读) — Vulnerability Class 4338

4338 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-125 (跨界内存读). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-125, Out-of-bounds Read, is a memory safety weakness where software accesses memory locations outside the designated buffer boundaries, either before its start or past its end. This vulnerability typically arises from insufficient bounds checking during array indexing or pointer arithmetic, allowing attackers to read sensitive data such as stack canaries, cryptographic keys, or internal application state. By leveraging this flaw, adversaries can achieve information disclosure or potentially facilitate further exploitation techniques like heap spraying. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing rigorous input validation, utilizing static analysis tools to detect unsafe memory access patterns, and adopting safer programming languages or libraries that enforce automatic bounds checking. Additionally, employing compiler protections like Address Sanitizer during development helps identify these errors early, ensuring that memory reads remain strictly within allocated limits to prevent unauthorized data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product reads data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer.
Common Consequences (4)
Confidentiality Read Memory
An attacker could get secret values such as cryptographic keys, PII, memory addresses, or other information that could be used in additional attacks.
Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism
Out-of-bounds memory could contain memory addresses or other information that can be used to bypass ASLR and other protection mechanisms in order to improve the reliability of exploiting a separate weakness for code execution.
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
An attacker could cause a segmentation fault or crash by causing memory to be read outside of the bounds of the buffer. This is especially likely when the code reads a variable amount of data and assumes that a sentinel exists to stop the read operation, such as a NUL in a string.
Other Varies by Context
The read operation could produce other undefined or unexpected results.
Mitigations (2)
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Architecture and Design Use a language that provides appropriate memory abstractions.
Examples (2)
In the following code, the method retrieves a value from an array at a specific array index location that is given as an input parameter to the method
int getValueFromArray(int *array, int len, int index) { int value; // check that the array index is less than the maximum // length of the array if (index < len) { // get the value at the specified index of the array value = array[index]; } // if array index is invalid then output error message // and return value indicating error else { printf("Value is: %d\n", array[index]); value = -1; } return value; }
Bad · C
... // check that the array index is within the correct // range of values for the array if (index >= 0 && index < len) { ...
Good · C
In the following C/C++ example the method processMessageFromSocket() will get a message from a socket, placed into a buffer, and will parse the contents of the buffer into a structure that contains the message length and the message body. A for loop is used to copy the message body into a local character string which will be passed to another method for processing.
int processMessageFromSocket(int socket) { int success; char buffer[BUFFER_SIZE]; char message[MESSAGE_SIZE]; // get message from socket and store into buffer //Ignoring possibliity that buffer > BUFFER_SIZE if (getMessage(socket, buffer, BUFFER_SIZE) > 0) { // place contents of the buffer into message structure ExMessage *msg = recastBuffer(buffer); // copy message body into string for processing int index; for (index = 0; index < msg->msgLength; index++) { message[index] = msg->msgBody[index]; } message[index] = '\0'; // process message success = processMessage(message); } return success; }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-70166 Windows DNS Denial of Service Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 6.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-70119 Windows DNS Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows Server 2022 6.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-70126 Windows Bluetooth Port Driver Remote Code Execution — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.1 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-70135 Windows Remote POS Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-70063 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 4.7 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-69974 Desktop Window Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 4.7 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-69959 Windows Overlay Filter Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-69967 Windows Overlay Filter Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-69914 Windows AppX Deployment Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-69952 Windows Overlay Filter Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-69867 SQLite Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-105726 Microsoft Defender Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft Defender for Endpoint for Windows 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108466 Windows Kernel Denial of Service Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-105718 Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-105595 Microsoft Office Access Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 8.8 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-94506 Microsoft Office Access Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 6.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-102867 Microsoft Office Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 6.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-103856 Adobe Framemaker | Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) — Adobe FrameMaker 2026 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-103857 Adobe Framemaker | Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) — Adobe FrameMaker 2026 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-105460 Bluez: bluez: stack-based out-of-bounds read in btmon via unvalidated num_keys in return_link_keys_evt() — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 5.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-81507 ESF-IDF: Bluetooth Classic L2CAP Heap Memory Disclosure Allowing Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data — esp-idf 6.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-109951 FreeRDP 3.17.1 before 3.32.0 Heap Buffer Over-Read via Proxy DRDYNVC Channel Name — FreeRDP 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-109950 FreeRDP 3.0.0 before 3.32.0 Heap Out-of-Bounds Read via RD Gateway Messages — FreeRDP 4.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-109677 FreeRDP 2.0.0-beta1 before 3.28.0 Out-of-Bounds Read via LocateCardsByATRA Handler — FreeRDP 6.5 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-65150 NVIDIA DALI越界读取漏洞致信息泄露及服务中断 — DALI 7.3 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-65147 NVIDIA DALI越界读取漏洞 — DALI 7.3 High 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-89208 Desigo PXC系列多个型号远程内存越界读取漏洞 — Capital Embedded AR Classic 431-422 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108960 Tiiny-AI PowerInfer FFN GPU-split Loader ggml-cuda.cu create_striped_mat_to_gpu out-of-bounds — PowerInfer 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-108955 Tiiny-AI PowerInfer GGUF ggml.c gguf_init_from_file out-of-bounds — PowerInfer 5.3 Medium 2026-10-13
CVE-2026-81858 IBM i is Affected By A Denial of Service Vulnerability in Host Servers — i 5.4 Medium 2026-10-12

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-125 (跨界内存读) represent 4338 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.