Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) — Vulnerability Class 1243

1243 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-190 represents a critical logic flaw where arithmetic operations exceed the maximum capacity of the assigned integer data type, causing the value to wrap around to a negative number or zero. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating input values to trigger the overflow, thereby bypassing security checks that assume the resulting number remains positive or within expected bounds. This often leads to severe consequences such as buffer overflows, memory corruption, or unauthorized access. To prevent such issues, developers must implement rigorous input validation and use safe arithmetic libraries that detect potential overflows before execution. Additionally, employing static analysis tools and adhering to secure coding standards ensures that integer calculations are handled with appropriate bounds checking, effectively mitigating the risk of wraparound errors in production environments.

MITRE CWE Description
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Common Consequences (5)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
This weakness can generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. When the calculated result is used for resource allocation, this weakness can cause too many (or too few) resources to be allocated, possibly enabling crashes if the product requests more resources than can be provided.
Integrity Modify Memory
If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the overflow/wraparound results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.
Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows, which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy.
Availability, Other Alter Execution Logic, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
If the overflow/wraparound occurs in a loop index variable, this could cause the loop to terminate at the wrong time - too early, too late, or not at all (i.e., infinite loops). With too many iterations, some loops could consume too many resources such as memory, file handles, etc., possibly leading…
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If integer values are used in security-critical decisions, such as calculating quotas or allocation limits, integer overflows can be used to cause an incorrect security decision.
Mitigations (5)
Requirements Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Implementation Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum…
Implementation Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]…
Examples (2)
The following image processing code allocates a table for images.
img_t table_ptr; /*struct containing img data, 10kB each*/ int num_imgs; ... num_imgs = get_num_imgs(); table_ptr = (img_t*)malloc(sizeof(img_t)*num_imgs); ...
Bad · C
The following code excerpt from OpenSSH 3.3 demonstrates a classic case of integer overflow:
nresp = packet_get_int(); if (nresp > 0) { response = xmalloc(nresp*sizeof(char*)); for (i = 0; i < nresp; i++) response[i] = packet_get_string(NULL); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-35415 Windows Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-05-12
CVE-2026-34330 Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-05-12
CVE-2026-34963 barebox EFI PE Loader Memory Safety Vulnerabilities — barebox 8.4 High 2026-05-11
CVE-2026-43894 jq: Wild stack write via signed-integer overflow in decNumber D2U() macro — jq 6.2 Medium 2026-05-11
CVE-2026-41257 jq: Signed-int overflow in `stack_reallocate` (jq VM stack) — jq - - 2026-05-11
CVE-2026-7568 Signed integer overflow in metaphone() — PHP 9.1 - 2026-05-10
CVE-2026-42311 Pillow: OOB Write with Invalid PSD Tile Extents (Integer Overflow) — Pillow 7.8 - 2026-05-09
CVE-2026-42308 Pillow: Integer overflow when processing fonts — Pillow 9.1 - 2026-05-09
CVE-2026-6664 PgBouncer integer overflow in PgBouncer network packet parsing — PgBouncer 7.5 High 2026-05-09
CVE-2026-42199 Grid: Integer Overflow in Grid::expand_rows Leads to Safe-API Undefined Behavior — grid 6.2 Medium 2026-05-08
CVE-2026-42217 OpenEXR: Shift exponent overflow in `readVariableLengthInteger()` (`ImfIDManifest.cpp`) — openexr 8.1AI High AI 2026-05-07
CVE-2026-41142 OpenEXR is Vulnerable to Integer overflow in ImageChannel::resize leads to heap OOB write via OpenEXRUtil public API — openexr 8.8 High 2026-05-07
CVE-2026-42144 CImg Library: Integer overflow in PNM size check bypasses memory guard (_load_pnm) — CImg 6.1 Medium 2026-05-04
CVE-2026-7598 libssh2 userauth.c userauth_password integer overflow — libssh2 7.3 High 2026-05-01
CVE-2026-28532 FRRouting < 10.5.3 Integer Overflow in OSPF TLV Parser Functions — frr 6.5 Medium 2026-04-30
CVE-2026-42798 Little CMS 输入验证错误漏洞 — little cms color engine 4.0 Medium 2026-04-30
CVE-2026-41605 Apache Thrift: Swift Compact Protocol integer overflow — Apache Thrift 9.8AI Critical AI 2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41602 Apache Thrift: Go TFramedTransport uint32 overflow — Apache Thrift 9.8AI Critical AI 2026-04-28
CVE-2026-41416 PJSIP: Asymmetric ptime integer overflow in Media Stream — pjproject 7.5AI High AI 2026-04-24
CVE-2026-33666 Zserio: Integer Overflow in BitStreamReader on 32-bit platforms — zserio 7.5 High 2026-04-24
CVE-2026-33662 OP-TEE: RSASSA EMSA- PKCS1-v1_5 underflow in emsa_pkcs1_v1_5_encode() — optee_os 7.5 High 2026-04-24
CVE-2026-32952 go-ntlmssp NTLM challenges can panic on malformed payloads — go-ntlmssp 5.3 Medium 2026-04-24
CVE-2026-41667 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 6.6 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-41666 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 6.6 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-41665 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 6.1 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-41664 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 6.6 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-40450 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 6.6 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-40449 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 6.6 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-40448 ONE 输入验证错误漏洞 — ONE 5.3 Medium 2026-04-22
CVE-2026-41144 F´ (F Prime) has Integer Overflow in FileUplink — fprime - - 2026-04-21

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) represent 1243 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.