Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) — Vulnerability Class 1048

1048 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-190 represents a critical logic flaw where arithmetic operations exceed the maximum capacity of the assigned integer data type, causing the value to wrap around to a negative number or zero. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating input values to trigger the overflow, thereby bypassing security checks that assume the resulting number remains positive or within expected bounds. This often leads to severe consequences such as buffer overflows, memory corruption, or unauthorized access. To prevent such issues, developers must implement rigorous input validation and use safe arithmetic libraries that detect potential overflows before execution. Additionally, employing static analysis tools and adhering to secure coding standards ensures that integer calculations are handled with appropriate bounds checking, effectively mitigating the risk of wraparound errors in production environments.

MITRE CWE Description
The product performs a calculation that can produce an integer overflow or wraparound when the logic assumes that the resulting value will always be larger than the original value. This occurs when an integer value is incremented to a value that is too large to store in the associated representation. When this occurs, the value may become a very small or negative number.
Common Consequences (5)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
This weakness can generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. When the calculated result is used for resource allocation, this weakness can cause too many (or too few) resources to be allocated, possibly enabling crashes if the product requests more resources than can be provided.
Integrity Modify Memory
If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the overflow/wraparound results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.
Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows, which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of the product's implicit security policy.
Availability, Other Alter Execution Logic, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)
If the overflow/wraparound occurs in a loop index variable, this could cause the loop to terminate at the wrong time - too early, too late, or not at all (i.e., infinite loops). With too many iterations, some loops could consume too many resources such as memory, file handles, etc., possibly leading…
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If integer values are used in security-critical decisions, such as calculating quotas or allocation limits, integer overflows can be used to cause an incorrect security decision.
Mitigations (5)
Requirements Ensure that all protocols are strictly defined, such that all out-of-bounds behavior can be identified simply, and require strict conformance to the protocol.
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. If possible, choose a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Use libraries or frameworks that make it easier to handle numbers without unexpected consequences. Examples include safe integer handling packages such as SafeInt (C++) or IntegerLib (C or C++). [REF-106]
Implementation Perform input validation on any numeric input by ensuring that it is within the expected range. Enforce that the input meets both the minimum and maximum requirements for the expected range. Use unsigned integers where possible. This makes it easier to perform validation for integer overflows. When signed integers are required, ensure that the range check includes minimum values as well as maximum…
Implementation Understand the programming language's underlying representation and how it interacts with numeric calculation (CWE-681). Pay close attention to byte size discrepancies, precision, signed/unsigned distinctions, truncation, conversion and casting between types, "not-a-number" calculations, and how the language handles numbers that are too large or too small for its underlying representation. [REF-7]…
Examples (2)
The following image processing code allocates a table for images.
img_t table_ptr; /*struct containing img data, 10kB each*/ int num_imgs; ... num_imgs = get_num_imgs(); table_ptr = (img_t*)malloc(sizeof(img_t)*num_imgs); ...
Bad · C
The following code excerpt from OpenSSH 3.3 demonstrates a classic case of integer overflow:
nresp = packet_get_int(); if (nresp > 0) { response = xmalloc(nresp*sizeof(char*)); for (i = 0; i < nresp; i++) response[i] = packet_get_string(NULL); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2024-21420 Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 8.8 High 2024-02-13
CVE-2024-21379 Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 7.8 High 2024-02-13
CVE-2024-21372 Windows OLE Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 8.8 High 2024-02-13
CVE-2024-21350 Microsoft WDAC OLE DB provider for SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1507 8.8 High 2024-02-13
CVE-2024-21851 Dsoftbus has an integer overflow vulnerability — OpenHarmony 2.9 Low 2024-02-02
CVE-2024-21845 Dsoftbus has an integer overflow vulnerability — OpenHarmony 2.9 Low 2024-02-02
CVE-2023-40548 Shim: interger overflow leads to heap buffer overflow in verify_sbat_section on 32-bits systems — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 7.4 High 2024-01-29
CVE-2024-23307 Integer overflow in raid5_cache_count in Linux kernel — Linux kernel 4.4 Medium 2024-01-25
CVE-2024-22211 FreeRDP integer Overflow leading to Heap Overflow — FreeRDP 3.7 Low 2024-01-19
CVE-2021-33631 Kernel crash in EXT4 filesystem — kernel 5.5 Medium 2024-01-18
CVE-2023-31034 CVE — DGX A100 6.6 Medium 2024-01-12
CVE-2023-49262 Buffer overflow vulnerability in Cookie authentication field — H8951-4G-ESP 8.8 - 2024-01-12
CVE-2024-20698 Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High 2024-01-09
CVE-2024-20654 Microsoft ODBC Driver Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 8.0 High 2024-01-09
CVE-2023-32650 GTKWave 安全漏洞 — GTKWave 7.0 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-35992 GTKWave 安全漏洞 — GTKWave 7.0 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-35128 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.0 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-36864 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-36915 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-36916 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38618 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38619 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38620 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38621 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38622 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38623 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38650 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.0 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38651 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.0 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-35004 GTKWave 输入验证错误漏洞 — GTKWave 7.8 High 2024-01-08
CVE-2023-38652 GTKWave 安全漏洞 — GTKWave 7.0 High 2024-01-08

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-190 (整数溢出或超界折返) represent 1048 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.