Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-193 (Off-by-one错误) — Vulnerability Class 78

78 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-193 (Off-by-one错误). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-193 represents an off-by-one error, a logic flaw where a product calculates or utilizes an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is exactly one unit greater or lesser than the correct limit. This weakness typically arises in boundary conditions during array indexing, loop iterations, or buffer allocation, leading to memory corruption or unexpected program termination. Attackers exploit these miscalculations to trigger buffer overflows, allowing them to overwrite adjacent memory structures with malicious payloads. By exceeding intended bounds, adversaries can execute arbitrary code, escalate privileges, or cause denial-of-service conditions. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must rigorously validate boundary conditions, employ static analysis tools to detect logic errors, and use high-level languages with automatic bounds checking. Additionally, thorough code reviews focusing on loop limits and array accesses ensure that integer arithmetic accurately reflects the intended data structure sizes, thereby eliminating the discrepancy that enables exploitation.

MITRE CWE Description
A product calculates or uses an incorrect maximum or minimum value that is 1 more, or 1 less, than the correct value.
Common Consequences (3)
AvailabilityDoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Instability
This weakness will generally lead to undefined behavior and therefore crashes. In the case of overflows involving loop index variables, the likelihood of infinite loops is also high.
IntegrityModify Memory
If the value in question is important to data (as opposed to flow), simple data corruption has occurred. Also, if the wrap around results in other conditions such as buffer overflows, further memory corruption may occur.
Confidentiality, Availability, Access ControlExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism
This weakness can sometimes trigger buffer overflows which can be used to execute arbitrary code. This is usually outside the scope of a program's implicit security policy.
Mitigations (1)
ImplementationWhen copying character arrays or using character manipulation methods, the correct size parameter must be used to account for the null terminator that needs to be added at the end of the array. Some examples of functions susceptible to this weakness in C include strcpy(), strncpy(), strcat(), strncat(), printf(), sprintf(), scanf() and sscanf().
Examples (2)
The following code allocates memory for a maximum number of widgets. It then gets a user-specified number of widgets, making sure that the user does not request too many. It then initializes the elements of the array using InitializeWidget(). Because the number of widgets can vary for each request, the code inserts a NULL pointer to signify the location of the last widget.
int i; unsigned int numWidgets; Widget **WidgetList; numWidgets = GetUntrustedSizeValue(); if ((numWidgets == 0) || (numWidgets > MAX_NUM_WIDGETS)) { ExitError("Incorrect number of widgets requested!"); } WidgetList = (Widget **)malloc(numWidgets * sizeof(Widget *)); printf("WidgetList ptr=%p\n", WidgetList); for(i=0; i<numWidgets; i++) { WidgetList[i] = InitializeWidget(); } WidgetList[numWidgets] = NULL; showWidgets(WidgetList);
Bad · C
In this example, the code does not account for the terminating null character, and it writes one byte beyond the end of the buffer.
char firstname[20]; char lastname[20]; char fullname[40]; fullname[0] = '\0'; strncat(fullname, firstname, 20); strncat(fullname, lastname, 20);
Bad · C
char firstname[20]; char lastname[20]; char fullname[40]; fullname[0] = '\0'; strncat(fullname, firstname, sizeof(fullname)-strlen(fullname)-1); strncat(fullname, lastname, sizeof(fullname)-strlen(fullname)-1);
Good · C
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-66806 Microsoft Office Word Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Microsoft 365 Apps for Enterprise 5.5 Medium2026-08-11
CVE-2026-71391 Off-by-One Error in GNU Emacs for Android — Emacs 5.3 Medium2026-08-10
CVE-2026-11771 OpenVPN 缓冲区错误漏洞 — OpenVPN 7.0 High2026-07-30
CVE-2026-44687 Off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legitimate parent's NXDOMAIN — Unbound 3.7 Low2026-07-22
CVE-2026-50497 Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) Information Disclosure Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 6.5 Medium2026-07-14
CVE-2026-58380 Gimp: gimp: stack buffer overflow in pnmscanner_gettoken() — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 7.3 High2026-07-06
CVE-2026-12413 IKEv2 Denial of Service via malformed fragmentation — libreswan 7.5 High2026-07-02
CVE-2026-7831 UltraVNC viewer off-by-one stack overflow in ServerInit desktop name parsing — UltraVNC 7.5 High2026-07-01
CVE-2026-44042 UltraVNC repeater wi_uudecode off-by-one in base64 decode boundary check — UltraVNC 3.7 Low2026-07-01
CVE-2026-58014 Glib: off-by-one error in glib/gkeyfile.c via "g_key_file_get_locale_string_list" — GLib 7.3 High2026-06-30
CVE-2026-58374 Jouni Malinen hostapd 数字错误漏洞 — hostapd 6.5 Medium2026-06-30
CVE-2026-56790 CANBoat - Off-by-One Global Buffer Overflow in searchForPgn() — canboat 7.3 High2026-06-25
CVE-2026-56787 RTKLIB 2.4.3 - Off-by-One Out-of-Bounds Read in decode_ssr3 via RTCM3 SSR Message — RTKLIB 6.5 Medium2026-06-25
CVE-2026-52804 Gogs: Privilege Escalation via Collaboration Access Mode Validation — gogs--2026-06-24
CVE-2026-54410 nanoMODBUS Off-by-One Buffer Overflow in recv_msg_header() via Crafted MBAP Length Field — nanoMODBUS 8.6 High2026-06-14
CVE-2026-46559 ImageMagick: Heap Buffer Over-Write of a single byte in the JP2 encoder — ImageMagick 4.0 Medium2026-06-10
CVE-2026-49127 Music Player Daemon < 0.24.11 Stack Buffer Overflow via pcm_unpack_24be — MPD 8.6 High2026-05-28
CVE-2026-42015 Gnutls: gnutls: memory corruption due to off-by-one error in pkcs#12 bag handling — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 5.3 Medium2026-05-26
CVE-2026-44065 Off-by-two in papd lp_write() — Netatalk 3.7 Medium2026-05-21
CVE-2026-45232 Rsync < 3.4.3 Off-by-One Stack Write via HTTP Proxy — rsync 3.1 Low2026-05-20
CVE-2026-44603 Tor 安全漏洞 — Tor 3.7 Low2026-05-07
CVE-2026-7572 Velociraptor EVTX Parser — Process Crash via Crafted .evtx File — velociraptor 4.4 Medium2026-05-06
CVE-2026-43964 Postfix 安全漏洞 — Postfix 3.7 Low2026-05-04
CVE-2026-43860 mutt 安全漏洞 — mutt 3.7 Low2026-05-04
CVE-2026-40254 FreeRDP: contains_dotdot() off-by-one allows drive channel path traversal via terminal .. — FreeRDP 4.2 Medium2026-04-24
CVE-2026-6861 Emacs: emacs: memory corruption vulnerability when processing svg css — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 6.1 Medium2026-04-22
CVE-2026-40312 ImageMagick: Off-by-One in MSL decoder could result in crash — ImageMagick 6.2 Medium2026-04-13
CVE-2026-33997 Moby: Off-by-one error in plugin privilege validation — moby 6.8 Medium2026-03-31
CVE-2026-5123 osrg GoBGP bgp.go DecodeFromBytes off-by-one — GoBGP 3.7 Low2026-03-30
CVE-2026-22593 EVerest has off-by-one stack buffer overflow in IsoMux certificate filename parsing — everest-core 8.4 High2026-03-26

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-193 (Off-by-one错误) represent 78 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.