Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4415

4415 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
Confidentiality Read Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and Design Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-115883 LangGraph: Namespace labels containing `.` reach other namespaces in Postgres and SQLite stores — langgraph 6.0 Medium 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-55444 Goobi viewer: Solr query injection via the legacy RSS servlet q and filterQuery parameters — goobi-viewer-core 5.3 Medium 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-55442 Goobi viewer: cleanUpQuery double-brace bypass allows arbitrary Solr local-param injection — goobi-viewer-core 5.3 Medium 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-115479 baserCMS: Mail-form auto-replies accept multiple visitor-controlled recipients — basercms 5.3 Medium 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-57210 Heimdall: IP Spoofing via Unvalidated Forwarding Headers — heimdall 7.0 High 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-57209 Heimdall: Forwarded Header Injection via Unsanitized Host Header in Proxy Mode — heimdall 7.0 High 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-89317 JwtVerifierImpl.Verify does not enforce the JWS `crit` header (RFC 7515 §4.1.11) — Eclipse KeyPont - GOSE 6.3 Medium 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-86020 Part-DB: Spreadsheet Formula Injection in XLSX Part Exports — Part-DB-server 4.6 Medium 2026-10-23
CVE-2026-115384 Wasmtime 39.0.0 before 48.0.4 and 49.0.0 before 49.0.2 Stack Buffer Overflow — wasmtime 9.9 Critical 2026-10-22
CVE-2026-115249 subhajitkhan online-clinic-management-system Appointment Booking patappointtime.php input validation — online-clinic-management-system 4.6 Medium 2026-10-22
CVE-2026-76505 Cisco IOS XR Software for ASR 9000 Series Routers IPv4 Unicast Packets Denial of Service Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XR Software 7.5 High 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-76476 Cisco Unified Communications Products Hardening Release: October 2026 - Improper Input Validation Vulnerabilities — Cisco Emergency Responder 8.8 High 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-76462 Cisco Secure Client Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — Cisco Secure Client 5.5 Medium 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-113786 pypdf: Unvalidated JPEG image data loading — pypdf 2.3 Low 2026-10-21
CVE-2024-6423 Sensitive Data Exposure via URL Parameters in Multiple WSO2 Products Allows Confidential Information Leakage — WSO2 API Manager 4.0 Medium 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-114101 Coraza before 3.8.1 Multipart filename* Charset Handling FILES Rule Bypass — coraza 4.0 Medium 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-114100 Coraza from 3.0.4 before 3.8.1 Request Body Inspection Bypass via Content-Type — coraza 5.8 Medium 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-114099 Coraza 3.0.0 before 3.8.1 WAF Bypass via JSON Key Collision — coraza 5.8 Medium 2026-10-21
CVE-2020-37289 Vyper before 0.3.1 Improper Input Validation of uint8 Interface Return Values — vyper 3.7 Low 2026-10-21
CVE-2026-113294 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 以下版本 Loader 组件输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113046 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 密码输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113063 Chrome 156 前Chromoting输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113292 Chrome Android 156 前 Omnibox 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113173 Android Chrome 156 前 UI 输入验证漏洞可执行代码 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113306 Chrome 156 前版本网络模块输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113023 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 扩展输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113244 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前 UI 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113214 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前全屏功能输入验证绕过漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113089 Chrome 156 前 PrintPreview 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113086 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 4415 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.