Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4415

4415 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
Confidentiality Read Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and Design Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-113235 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前密码输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113062 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前 API 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113120 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前媒体模块输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113099 Chrome Android 156.0.8078.47 前 Omnibox 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113230 Chrome 156 前版本浏览器输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113016 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前扩展输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113084 Chrome 156 前权限输入验证漏洞致沙盒逃逸 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113328 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 隐私组件输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113195 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 下载模块输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113060 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前蓝牙输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113249 Chrome 156 iOS 输入验证漏洞可致沙箱代码执行 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113162 Chrome 156 以下 Actor 组件输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113289 Chrome 156 之前版本 PerformanceAPIs 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113264 Google Chrome 156.0.8078.47 扩展输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113147 Chrome 156 之前 WebShare 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113078 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 合成输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113231 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 扩展输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113040 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 代理组件输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113012 Chrome 156 之前版本 GPU 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113175 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前 FileSystem 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113334 Chrome 156 前 Windows 版 ANGLE 远程代码执行漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113020 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 Date 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113252 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前ANGLE 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113316 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 以下 Views 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-113117 Chrome 156.0.8078.47 前 ANGLE 输入验证漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-92287 Apache Arrow C++, PyArrow: Parquet file-controlled KMS URL is forwarded to pluggable KmsClient that skips host validation — Apache Arrow C++ - - 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-110180 fast-uri vulnerable to host confusion via unchecked WHATWG host canonicalization — fast-uri 4.8 Medium 2026-10-20
CVE-2026-55644 Element X iOS: io.element.call deeplink allows attacker-controlled HTTPS origin and may grant mic/camera to that origin — element-x-ios 5.1 Medium 2026-10-19
CVE-2026-85314 Apache Camel: Camel-Mail Header Injection via Unfiltered mail.smtp Headers in the MimeMultipart Data Format (Incomplete Fix of CVE-2026-46584) — Apache Camel 6.5 Medium 2026-10-19
CVE-2026-85312 Apache Camel: Camel-Core Saga Participation Hijacking via the Unfiltered Long-Running-Action Header — Apache Camel 4.8 Medium 2026-10-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 4415 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.