Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 4415

4415 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-20 represents a critical software weakness where applications fail to properly verify the integrity, format, or type of incoming data before processing it. This oversight allows attackers to inject malicious payloads, such as SQL injection strings or cross-site scripting code, which can bypass security controls and compromise system integrity. Exploitation typically occurs when untrusted data from external sources, like user forms or network packets, is treated as executable code or trusted input. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement rigorous input validation strategies, including strict type checking, length constraints, and allow-listing acceptable characters. Additionally, employing parameterized queries and output encoding ensures that even if validation fails, the injected data remains inert, thereby preserving application security and preventing unauthorized execution or data exposure.

MITRE CWE Description
The product receives input or data, but it does not validate or incorrectly validates that the input has the properties that are required to process the data safely and correctly. Input validation is a frequently-used technique for checking potentially dangerous inputs in order to ensure that the inputs are safe for processing within the code, or when communicating with other components. Input can consist of: raw data - strings, numbers, parameters, file contents, etc. metadata - information about the raw data, such as headers or size Data can be simple or structured. Structured data can be composed of many nested layers, composed of combinations of metadata and raw data, with other simple or structured data. Many properties of raw data or metadata may need to be validated upon entry into the code, such as: specified quantities such as size, length, frequency, price, rate, number of operations, time, etc. implied or derived quantities, such as the actual size of a file instead of a specified size indexes, offsets, or positions into more complex data structures symbolic keys or other elements into hash tables, associative arrays, etc. well-formedness, i.e. syntactic correctness - compliance with expected syntax lexical token correctness - compliance with rules for what is treated as a token specified or derived type - the actual type of the input (or what the input appears to be) consistency - between individual data el…
Common Consequences (3)
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)
An attacker could provide unexpected values and cause a program crash or arbitrary control of resource allocation, leading to excessive consumption of resources such as memory and CPU.
Confidentiality Read Memory, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read confidential data if they are able to control resource references.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
An attacker could use malicious input to modify data or possibly alter control flow in unexpected ways, including arbitrary command execution.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Consider using language-theoretic security (LangSec) techniques that characterize inputs using a formal language and build "recognizers" for that language. This effectively requires parsing to be a distinct layer that effectively enforces a boundary between raw input and internal data representations, instead of allowing parser code to be scattered throughout the program, where it could be subjec…
Architecture and Design Use an input validation framework such as Struts or the OWASP ESAPI Validation API. Note that using a framework does not automatically address all input validation problems; be mindful of weaknesses that could arise from misusing the framework itself (CWE-1173).
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter the product, including but not limited to: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may b…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Effectiveness: High
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server. Even though clien…
Examples (2)
This example demonstrates a shopping interaction in which the user is free to specify the quantity of items to be purchased and a total is calculated.
... public static final double price = 20.00; int quantity = currentUser.getAttribute("quantity"); double total = price * quantity; chargeUser(total); ...
Bad · Java
This example asks the user for a height and width of an m X n game board with a maximum dimension of 100 squares.
... #define MAX_DIM 100 ... /* board dimensions */ int m,n, error; board_square_t *board; printf("Please specify the board height: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &m); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } printf("Please specify the board width: \n"); error = scanf("%d", &n); if ( EOF == error ){ die("No integer passed: Die evil hacker!\n"); } if ( m > MAX_DIM || n > MAX_DIM ) { die("Value too large: Die evil hacker!\n"); } board = (board_square_t*) malloc( m * n * sizeof(board_square_t)); ...
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-84504 fastify vulnerable to request body replacement via an async validation result collision — fastify 8.1 High 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85528 Snowflake JDBC Driver auto-configuration account validation permits credential redirection — Snowflake JDBC Driver 5.3 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85047 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-85239 MISP Event Template Definition Validation Bypass Allows Persistent Denial of Service — misp 7.1 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-85170 n8n before 1.123.73 Local File Read and SSRF via Gmail and Brevo nodes — n8n 7.1 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-49830 DSpace: ORE resource URI does not validate scheme for non-web resources — DSpace 4.4 Medium 2026-09-02
CVE-2026-53600 async-tar PAX extension-header desync enables tar entry/content smuggling — async-tar 6.3 Medium 2026-09-02
CVE-2026-84325 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-01
CVE-2026-84357 Google Chrome 输入验证错误漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-01
CVE-2026-82740 Ash.Type ignores outer array constraints on nested {:array, {:array, type}} inputs — ash 2.1 Low 2026-09-01
CVE-2026-82738 Ash.Type.UUIDv7 accepts non-v7 UUIDs that then fail to load, causing persistent denial of service — ash 5.9 Medium 2026-09-01
CVE-2026-82732 Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes — ash_typescript 6.3 Medium 2026-09-01
CVE-2026-83492 WordPress Kubio AI Website Builder - Denial Of Service — Kubio AI Website Builder 6.9 Medium 2026-08-31
CVE-2026-81633 Unhandled KeyError in AshGraphql relay node resolution crashes queries via an unknown type segment — ash_graphql 6.9 Medium 2026-08-30
CVE-2026-82550 Linux Foundation Magma NGSetupRequest input validation — Magma 5.3 Medium 2026-08-30
CVE-2026-82648 WWBN AVideo SSRF Filter Bypass via NAT64 Hex Address — AVideo 7.1 High 2026-08-30
CVE-2026-82639 NextChat 2.15.8 through 2.16.1 OpenAI API Key Disclosure — NextChat 7.5 High 2026-08-30
CVE-2026-55068 free5GC: NRF nnrf-nfm lacks NF Profile input validation — enables NF Registration Poisoning with arbitrary service endpoints — free5gc 9.3 Critical 2026-08-28
CVE-2026-81707 openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 ANSI Escape Injection via Identity Email — openssl_encrypt 9.8 Critical 2026-08-27
CVE-2026-81686 openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 D-Bus Properties Authorization Bypass — openssl_encrypt 6.2 Medium 2026-08-27
CVE-2026-57499 Liman: OS Command Injection in LogRotationController allows authenticated admin to execute arbitrary commands (RCE) — core 9.1 Critical 2026-08-27
CVE-2026-81827 Flowintel Login Email Validation Bypass Allows Log Injection via Crafted Email Input — flowintel 6.9 Medium 2026-08-27
CVE-2026-59354 Spring Security OAuth2 Authorization Server: Insufficient validation of Dynamic Client Registration metadata — Spring Security (OAuth2 Authorization Server module) 9.6 Critical 2026-08-27
CVE-2026-56547 An input reflection vulnerability affects HCL Traveler — Traveler 3.5 Low 2026-08-26
CVE-2026-13480 Out-of-bounds read in LoRaWAN fragmented data block transport (FUOTA) downlink handler — zephyr 3.1 Low 2026-08-26
CVE-2026-77554 Ubiquiti UniFi Talk Application 输入验证错误漏洞 — UniFi Talk Application 10.0 Critical 2026-08-26
CVE-2026-77552 Ubiquiti UniFi Enterprise Audio/Video Bridge 输入验证错误漏洞 — UniFi Enterprise Audio/Video Bridge 9.8 Critical 2026-08-26
CVE-2026-77548 Ubiquiti UniFi Protect Application 输入验证错误漏洞 — UniFi Protect Application 9.9 Critical 2026-08-26
CVE-2026-77547 Ubiquiti UniFi Access Application 输入验证错误漏洞 — UniFi Access Application 9.9 Critical 2026-08-26
CVE-2026-77546 Ubiquiti UniFi Access Application 输入验证错误漏洞 — UniFi Access Application 9.9 Critical 2026-08-26

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-20 (输入验证不恰当) represent 4415 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.