Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-295 (证书验证不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 823

823 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-295 (证书验证不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-295 represents a critical cryptographic weakness where software fails to properly validate digital certificates, undermining the integrity of secure communications. Attackers typically exploit this flaw by performing man-in-the-middle attacks, intercepting traffic between a client and server. By presenting a forged or invalid certificate, adversaries can decrypt sensitive data, inject malicious content, or impersonate legitimate services without detection. This vulnerability is particularly dangerous in applications relying on Transport Layer Security for confidentiality. To prevent such breaches, developers must implement rigorous certificate validation mechanisms, ensuring that the presented certificate is signed by a trusted Certificate Authority and matches the expected hostname. Additionally, enabling Certificate Pinning and strictly rejecting expired or revoked certificates further hardens the application against interception attempts, thereby preserving the authenticity and security of the data exchange.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not validate, or incorrectly validates, a certificate.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Authentication Bypass Protection Mechanism, Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
When a certificate is invalid or malicious, it might allow an attacker to spoof a trusted entity by interfering in the communication path between the host and client. The product might connect to a malicious host while believing it is a trusted host, or the product might be deceived into accepting s…
Mitigations (2)
Architecture and Design, Implementation Certificates should be carefully managed and checked to assure that data are encrypted with the intended owner's public key.
Implementation If certificate pinning is being used, ensure that all relevant properties of the certificate are fully validated before the certificate is pinned, including the hostname.
Examples (2)
This code checks the certificate of a connected peer.
if ((cert = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl)) && host) foo=SSL_get_verify_result(ssl); if ((X509_V_OK==foo) || X509_V_ERR_SELF_SIGNED_CERT_IN_CHAIN==foo)) // certificate looks good, host can be trusted
Bad · C
The following OpenSSL code obtains a certificate and verifies it.
cert = SSL_get_peer_certificate(ssl); if (cert && (SSL_get_verify_result(ssl)==X509_V_OK)) { // do secret things }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-30279 File Station 5 — File Station 5 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-33031 File Station 5 — File Station 5 9.8AI Critical AI 2025-06-06
CVE-2025-5279 Issue with Amazon Redshift Python Connector and the BrowserAzureOAuth2CredentialsProvider plugin — Redshift 7.5AI High AI 2025-05-27
CVE-2024-13956 SSL Verification Bypass — ASPECT-Enterprise 6.7 Medium 2025-05-22
CVE-2025-4575 The x509 application adds trusted use instead of rejected use — OpenSSL 7.5AI High AI 2025-05-22
CVE-2024-45641 IBM Security ReaQta improper certificate validation — Security ReaQta EDR 6.5 Medium 2025-05-20
CVE-2023-33861 IBM Security ReaQta improper certificate validation — Security ReaQta EDR 6.5 Medium 2025-05-20
CVE-2025-3463 ASUS DriverHub 安全漏洞 — DriverHub 10.0AI Critical AI 2025-05-09
CVE-2025-20157 Cisco Catalyst vManage Certificate Validation Vulnerability — Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Manager 5.9 Medium 2025-05-07
CVE-2025-46551 JRuby-OpenSSL has hostname verification disabled by default — jruby-openssl 5.9 - 2025-05-07
CVE-2024-47619 tranport: TLS host name wildcard matching too lax — syslog-ng 7.5 High 2025-05-07
CVE-2025-3218 IBM i improper certificate validation — i 5.4 Medium 2025-05-07
CVE-2025-37730 Logstash Improper Certificate Validation in TCP output — Logstash 6.5 Medium 2025-05-06
CVE-2025-20670 MediaTek Chipsets 信任管理问题漏洞 — MT2737, MT6813, MT6835, MT6835T, MT6878, MT6878M, MT6879, MT6886, MT6895, MT6895TT, MT6896, MT6897, MT6899, MT6980, MT6980D, MT6983, MT6983T, MT6985, MT6985T, MT6989, MT6989T, MT6990, MT6991, MT8666, MT8667, MT8673, MT8675, MT8676, MT8678, MT8765, MT8766, MT8768, MT8771, MT8781, MT8786, MT8788, MT8788E, MT8789, MT8791, MT8791T, MT8795T, MT8797, MT8798 5.7AI Medium AI 2025-05-05
CVE-2025-26478 Dell ECS 信任管理问题漏洞 — ECS 3.1 Low 2025-04-17
CVE-2024-42193 HCL BigFix Web Reports is susceptible to a Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) attack — HCL BigFix Platform 7.4AI High AI 2025-04-15
CVE-2025-30000 Siemens License Server 信任管理问题漏洞 — Siemens License Server (SLS) 6.7 Medium 2025-04-08
CVE-2021-25635 Content Manipulation with Certificate Validation Attack — LibreOffice 7.5 - 2025-03-21
CVE-2025-0254 HCL Digital Experience components Ring API and dxclient may be vulnerable to man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks prior to 9.5 CF226. — HCL Digital Experience 5.9 Medium 2025-03-20
CVE-2024-10445 Synology DiskStation Manager(DSM)和Synology BeeStation Manager 信任管理问题漏洞 — DiskStation Manager (DSM) 4.3 Medium 2025-03-19
CVE-2024-10444 Synology DiskStation Manager 信任管理问题漏洞 — DiskStation Manager (DSM) 7.5 High 2025-03-19
CVE-2023-48785 Fortinet FortiNAC-F 信任管理问题漏洞 — FortiNAC-F 4.4 Medium 2025-03-14
CVE-2024-40590 Fortinet FortiPortal 信任管理问题漏洞 — FortiPortal 4.4 Medium 2025-03-14
CVE-2024-41724 Gallagher Command Centre 信任管理问题漏洞 — Command Centre Server 8.7 High 2025-03-10
CVE-2024-43107 Gallagher Milestone Integration Plugin 信任管理问题漏洞 — Milestone Integration Plugin 7.2 High 2025-03-10
CVE-2024-50394 Helpdesk — Helpdesk 7.4 - 2025-03-07
CVE-2025-1001 Medixant RadiAnt DICOM Viewer Improper Certificate Validation — RadiAnt DICOM Viewer 5.7 Medium 2025-02-21
CVE-2024-29171 Dell BSAFE 信任管理问题漏洞 — Dell BSAFE SSL-J 5.9 Medium 2025-02-12
CVE-2025-1002 MicroDicom DICOM Viewer Improper Certificate Validation — DICOM Viewer 5.7 Medium 2025-02-10
CVE-2024-11621 Devolutions Remote Desktop Manager 信任管理问题漏洞 — Remote Desktop Manager 7.4 - 2025-02-10

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-295 (证书验证不恰当) represent 823 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.