Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-426 (不可信的搜索路径) — Vulnerability Class 249

249 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-426 (不可信的搜索路径). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-426 represents a critical input validation weakness where software relies on an externally-supplied search path to locate essential resources, such as executables or configuration files, rather than using absolute paths or trusted directories. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the environment variable or system path to point to malicious code placed in a directory with higher precedence than the legitimate resource location. This allows them to execute arbitrary programs, access unauthorized data, or alter configurations unexpectedly, effectively achieving privilege escalation or remote code execution. To prevent this, developers must enforce strict path validation, utilize absolute paths for critical resources, and implement secure coding practices that restrict search directories to trusted, controlled locations. Additionally, applying the principle of least privilege ensures that even if an attacker manipulates the path, they cannot execute harmful code due to insufficient permissions.

MITRE CWE Description
The product searches for critical resources using an externally-supplied search path that can point to resources that are not under the product's direct control. This might allow attackers to execute their own programs, access unauthorized data files, or modify configuration in unexpected ways. If the product uses a search path to locate critical resources such as programs, then an attacker could modify that search path to point to a malicious program, which the targeted product would then execute. The problem extends to any type of critical resource that the product trusts. Some of the most common variants of untrusted search path are: In various UNIX and Linux-based systems, the PATH environment variable may be consulted to locate executable programs, and LD_PRELOAD may be used to locate a separate library. In various Microsoft-based systems, the PATH environment variable is consulted to locate a DLL, if the DLL is not found in other paths that appear earlier in the search order.
Common Consequences (3)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability, Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
There is the potential for arbitrary code execution with privileges of the vulnerable program.
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
The program could be redirected to the wrong files, potentially triggering a crash or hang when the targeted file is too large or does not have the expected format.
Confidentiality Read Files or Directories
The program could send the output of unauthorized files to the attacker.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design, Implementation Hard-code the search path to a set of known-safe values (such as system directories), or only allow them to be specified by the administrator in a configuration file. Do not allow these settings to be modified by an external party. Be careful to avoid related weaknesses such as CWE-426 and CWE-428.
Implementation When invoking other programs, specify those programs using fully-qualified pathnames. While this is an effective approach, code that uses fully-qualified pathnames might not be portable to other systems that do not use the same pathnames. The portability can be improved by locating the full-qualified paths in a centralized, easily-modifiable location within the source code, and having the code ref…
Implementation Remove or restrict all environment settings before invoking other programs. This includes the PATH environment variable, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and other settings that identify the location of code libraries, and any application-specific search paths.
Implementation Check your search path before use and remove any elements that are likely to be unsafe, such as the current working directory or a temporary files directory.
Implementation Use other functions that require explicit paths. Making use of any of the other readily available functions that require explicit paths is a safe way to avoid this problem. For example, system() in C does not require a full path since the shell can take care of it, while execl() and execv() require a full path.
Examples (2)
This program is intended to execute a command that lists the contents of a restricted directory, then performs other actions. Assume that it runs with setuid privileges in order to bypass the permissions check by the operating system.
#define DIR "/restricted/directory" char cmd[500]; sprintf(cmd, "ls -l %480s", DIR); /* Raise privileges to those needed for accessing DIR. */ RaisePrivileges(...); system(cmd); DropPrivileges(...); ...
Bad · C
The user sets the PATH to reference a directory under the attacker's control, such as "/my/dir/". The attacker creates a malicious program called "ls", and puts that program in /my/dir The user executes the program. When system() is executed, the shell consults the PATH to find the ls program The program finds the attacker's malicious program, "/my/dir/ls". It doesn't find "/bin/ls" because PATH does not contain "/bin/". The program executes the attacker's malicious program with the raised privileges.
Attack
The following code from a system utility uses the system property APPHOME to determine the directory in which it is installed and then executes an initialization script based on a relative path from the specified directory.
... String home = System.getProperty("APPHOME"); String cmd = home + INITCMD; java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(cmd); ...
Bad · Java
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-105331 mk-oracle: Local privilege escalation via malicious Oracle Instant Client — Checkmk 5.2 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-106505 Backstage: Bypass of MkDocs configuration sanitizer in TechDocs backend — backstage 7.7 High 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-59265 Apache OpenOffice, Apache OpenOffice: Opening a malicious document can lead to system takeover — Apache OpenOffice - - 2026-10-02
CVE-2026-19547 Local Privilege Escalation in Ghostscript for Windows — Ghostscript 7.0 High 2026-09-29
CVE-2026-87723 Untrusted Search Path (PATH Hijacking) in fuse-archive — fuse-archive 5.4 Medium 2026-09-28
CVE-2026-100584 OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 Allowlist Bypass via Workspace Shadows — OpenClaw 6.7 Medium 2026-09-26
CVE-2026-100310 GNU libextractor before 1.16 Privilege Escalation via LIBEXTRACTOR_PREFIX — libextractor 7.0 High 2026-09-25
CVE-2026-68492 Plesk 18.0.34-18.0.81 路径遍历漏洞 — Plesk 8.7 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-92587 n8n before 1.123.76 Sandbox Escape via Git Relative URL — n8n 5.0 Medium 2026-09-16
CVE-2026-0307 GlobalProtect App: Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities — GlobalProtect App 5.9 Medium 2026-09-10
CVE-2026-80159 Acrobat Reader | Untrusted Search Path (CWE-426) — Adobe Acrobat 4.0 Medium 2026-09-08
CVE-2026-81192 OpenTelemetry.Resources.Host vulnerable to arbitrary code execution via local PATH hijacking on macOS — opentelemetry-dotnet-contrib 7.0 High 2026-09-08
CVE-2026-78574 Improper Assembly Resolution in Okta Hyperdrive Integration Plugin Registry Handling — Okta Hyperdrive Integration Plugin 7.5 High 2026-09-08
CVE-2026-69785 Windows Smart Card Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-09-08
CVE-2026-69328 Windows Storage Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1607 7.8 High 2026-09-08
CVE-2026-84226 OpenVPN 权限许可和访问控制问题漏洞 — OpenVPN 8.5 High 2026-09-07
CVE-2026-82862 Hulumi before v1.3.2 Helper Script Shadowing via Workspace Files — hulumi 8.4 High 2026-08-31
CVE-2026-81697 openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 KDF Downgrade via CWD-relative Configuration — openssl_encrypt 5.5 Medium 2026-08-27
CVE-2026-75768 Substance3D - Painter | Untrusted Search Path (CWE-426) — Substance3D - Painter 7.8 High 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-78680 NLTK before 3.10.3 Arbitrary Code Execution via Graphviz dot Binary — nltk 7.8 High 2026-08-25
CVE-2026-78155 Untrusted Search Path in StackGres — StackGres 9.9 Critical 2026-08-23
CVE-2026-55769 CloudNativePG: Overriding operators can lead to privilege escalation in CloudNativePG for SQL queries without a fixed `search_path` — cloudnative-pg 9.4 Critical 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-16869 Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS — AIX 7.8 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-74872 openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Arbitrary Code Execution via Whirlpool — openssl_encrypt 9.8 Critical 2026-08-17
CVE-2026-16674 IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in WebSphere Application Server Liberty — i 8.8 High 2026-08-13
CVE-2026-14875 IBM i Access Client Solutions (ACS) is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities — i Access Client Solutions 7.3 High 2026-08-13
CVE-2026-14673 PostgreSQL amcheck does not clear untrusted search path — PostgreSQL 3.8 Low 2026-08-13
CVE-2026-0299 GlobalProtect App: Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerabilities — GlobalProtect App 5.9 Medium 2026-08-13
CVE-2026-56174 Windows Narrator Braille Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Windows 10 Version 1809 7.8 High 2026-08-11
CVE-2026-41447 FirmaCheck < 1.3.16 DLL Hijacking via Unvalidated OpenSSL Configuration Path — FirmaCheck 7.8 High 2026-08-03

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-426 (不可信的搜索路径) represent 249 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.