目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CWE-441 未有动机的代理或中间人(混淆代理) 类漏洞列表 63

CWE-441 未有动机的代理或中间人(混淆代理) 类弱点 63 条 CVE 漏洞汇总,含 AI 中文分析。

CWE-441 属于身份混淆漏洞,指系统在转发请求时未保留原始来源信息,导致其伪装成请求发起者。攻击者常利用此缺陷,通过中间系统间接执行特权操作,从而绕过访问控制。开发者应避免此问题,确保在跨边界通信时严格验证并传递原始身份标识,实施最小权限原则,防止系统被误用为不受控的代理。

MITRE CWE 官方描述
CWE:CWE-441 意外代理或中间人('Confused Deputy') 英文:产品从上游组件接收请求、消息或指令,但在将请求转发给处于产品控制范围之外的外部实体之前,未能充分保留请求的原始来源。这导致产品表现为请求的来源,从而充当上游组件与外部实体之间的代理或其他中间人。 如果攻击者无法直接联系目标,但产品可以访问该目标,则攻击者可以向产品发送请求,并让该产品将请求转发至目标。该请求看起来来自产品系统,而非攻击者系统。因此,攻击者可以绕过访问控制(例如防火墙)或隐藏恶意请求的来源,因为这些请求并非直接来自攻击者。由于代理功能和消息转发通常具有合法用途,只有满足以下条件时,此问题才会成为漏洞:产品以不同的权限运行或在不同的系统上运行,或者具有与上游组件不同的访问级别;攻击者被阻止直接向目标发起请求;以及攻击者可以创建代理未明确意图代表请求者转发的请求。此类请求可能指向意外的主机名、端口号、硬件 IP 或服务。或者,请求可能发送至允许的服务,但请求可能包含不允许的指令、命令或资源。
常见影响 (1)
Non-Repudiation, Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Hide Activities, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
缓解措施 (2)
Architecture and Design Enforce the use of strong mutual authentication mechanism between the two parties.
Architecture and Design Whenever a product is an intermediary or proxy for transactions between two other components, the proxy core should not drop the identity of the initiator of the transaction. The immutability of the identity of the initiator must be maintained and should be forwarded all the way to the target.
代码示例 (1)
A SoC contains a microcontroller (running ring-3 (least trusted ring) code), a Memory Mapped Input Output (MMIO) mapped IP core (containing design-house secrets), and a Direct Memory Access (DMA) controller, among several other compute elements and peripherals. The SoC implements access control…
The code in ring-3 (least trusted ring) of the
                     microcontroller attempts to directly read the protected
                     registers in IP core through MMIO transactions. However,
                     this attempt is blocked due to the implemented access
                     control. Now, the microcontroller configures the DMA core
                     to transfer data from the protected registers to a memory
                     region that it has access to. The DMA core, which is
                     acting as an intermediary in this transaction, does not
              
Bad · Other
The DMA
                     core forwards this transaction with the identity of the
                     code executing on the microcontroller, which is the
                     original initiator of the end-to-end transaction. Now the
                     transaction is blocked, as a result of forwarding the
                     identity of the true initiator which lacks the permission
                     to access the confidential MMIO mapped IP core.
Good · Other
CVE ID 标题 CVSS 风险等级 Published
CVE-2026-87502 Google Chrome 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-09
CVE-2026-87582 Google Chrome 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-09
CVE-2026-87442 Google Chrome 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-09
CVE-2026-87453 Google Chrome 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-09
CVE-2026-69531 Microsoft Windows Speech 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Windows 10 Version 1607 5.5 Medium 2026-09-08
CVE-2026-86115 simstudioai sim 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — sim 5.0 Medium 2026-09-05
CVE-2026-84329 Google Chrome 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-09-01
CVE-2026-77348 Miguel Ribeiro Wallos 配置错误漏洞 — Wallos 8.2 High 2026-08-31
CVE-2026-67567 Redhat Advanced Cluster Management 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 9.9 Critical 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-73424 Astro 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — astro 6.5 Medium 2026-08-17
CVE-2026-72640 Elastic Eck Operator 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Eck Operator 6.5 Medium 2026-08-13
CVE-2026-73266 Stolostron clusterclaims-controller 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1 7.1 High 2026-08-13
CVE-2026-70398 Redhat Advanced Cluster Management 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 9.6 Critical 2026-08-12
CVE-2026-72526 Redhat Advanced Cluster Management 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 9.9 Critical 2026-08-12
CVE-2026-16456 Red Hat OpenShift AI 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 6.5 Medium 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-44964 Datadog 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Android App - - 2026-08-07
CVE-2026-44945 SUSE Rancher 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Rancher 9.1 Critical 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-43910 Appium java-client 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — java-client 8.2 High 2026-07-28
CVE-2026-17107 Red Hat Multicluster Engine for Kubernetes 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — multicluster engine for Kubernetes 2.1 8.5 High 2026-07-24
CVE-2026-42933 Pronetiqs IntraVUE 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — Panduit Intravue 10.0 Critical 2026-07-23
CVE-2026-13062 MongoDB Server 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — MongoDB Server 6.5 Medium 2026-07-22
CVE-2026-16158 Fastify @fastify/reply-from 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — @fastify/reply-from 8.7 High 2026-07-18
CVE-2026-53931 NocoDB 服务端请求伪造漏洞 — nocodb - - 2026-06-23
CVE-2026-44494 Axios 安全漏洞 — axios 8.7 High 2026-06-11
CVE-2026-49821 Fission 安全漏洞 — fission 7.7 High 2026-06-10
CVE-2026-48522 pyjwt 代码问题漏洞 — pyjwt 4.2 Medium 2026-05-28
CVE-2026-3160 GitLab 安全漏洞 — GitLab 5.8 Medium 2026-05-14
CVE-2026-45003 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 5.0 Medium 2026-05-11
CVE-2026-44992 OpenClaw 安全漏洞 — OpenClaw 5.0 Medium 2026-05-11
CVE-2026-42313 pyLoad 安全漏洞 — pyload 8.3 High 2026-05-11

CWE-441(未有动机的代理或中间人(混淆代理)) 是常见的弱点类别,本平台收录该类弱点关联的 63 条 CVE 漏洞。