Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) — Vulnerability Class 2075

2075 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-639 represents an authorization bypass weakness where systems fail to validate that a user is permitted to access a resource identified by a user-controlled key. Attackers typically exploit this by manipulating identifiers, such as changing a numeric user ID in a URL or API parameter, to retrieve or modify another user’s private data. This insecure direct object reference allows unauthorized access without requiring authentication bypasses. Developers prevent this vulnerability by implementing robust server-side authorization checks that verify the requesting user’s permissions against the requested resource, rather than trusting client-supplied identifiers. Additionally, using indirect references or opaque tokens instead of predictable, sequential keys can mitigate the risk of enumeration and unauthorized access attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Retrieval of a user record occurs in the system based on some key value that is under user control. The key would typically identify a user-related record stored in the system and would be used to lookup that record for presentation to the user. It is likely that an attacker would have to be an authenticated user in the system. However, the authorization process would not properly check the data access operation to ensure that the authenticated user performing the operation has sufficient entitlements to perform the requested data access, hence bypassing any other authorization checks present in the system. For example, attackers can look at places where user specific data is retrieved (e.g. search screens) and determine whether the key for the item being looked up is controllable externally. The key may be a hidden field in the HTML form field, might be passed as a URL parameter or as an unencrypted cookie variable, then in each of these cases it will be possible to tamper with the key value. One manifestation of this weakness is when a system uses sequential or otherwise easily-guessable session IDs that would allow one user to easily switch to another user's session and read/modify their data.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
Access control checks for specific user data or functionality can be bypassed.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Horizontal escalation of privilege is possible (one user can view/modify information of another user).
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Vertical escalation of privilege is possible if the user-controlled key is actually a flag that indicates administrator status, allowing the attacker to gain administrative access.
Mitigations (3)
Architecture and Design For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design, Implementation Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
Examples (1)
The following code uses a parameterized statement, which escapes metacharacters and prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities, to construct and execute a SQL query that searches for an invoice matching the specified identifier [1]. The identifier is selected from a list of all invoices associated with the current authenticated user.
... conn = new SqlConnection(_ConnectionString); conn.Open(); int16 id = System.Convert.ToInt16(invoiceID.Text); SqlCommand query = new SqlCommand( "SELECT * FROM invoices WHERE id = @id", conn); query.Parameters.AddWithValue("@id", id); SqlDataReader objReader = objCommand.ExecuteReader(); ...
Bad · C#
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-105811 Authorization bypass through a user-controlled key in the Amazon Q Business Lambda hook sample in QnABot on AWS — qnabot-on-aws 6.5 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-102157 Security Advisory 0190 — CloudVision CUE 5.9 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-103009 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Elasticsearch Leading to Information Disclosure — Elasticsearch 7.1 High 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-102406 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Kibana Leading to Cross-Tenant Data Interception — Kibana 8.8 High 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106100 Payload: Field-level write access bypass in Payload on MongoDB — payload 7.1 High 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-105867 Payload: Client uploads could overwrite S3 objects — payload 7.1 High 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-105859 Payload: Unauthorized update to collection documents — payload 9.8 Critical 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-87975 Privilege abuse in model formsets with editable primary keys — Django 4.3 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-105836 QloApps through 1.7.0 Authorization Bypass via ajaxProcessBulkUpdateRooms — QloApps 5.4 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-39756 WordPress Wappointment plugin <= 2.7.7 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — Wappointment 6.5 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-32576 WordPress Faktur Pro for WooCommerce plugin <= 3.2.2 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — Faktur Pro for WooCommerce 6.5 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-105572 PickMall Lilishop Buyer Invoice List receipt authorization — PickMall Lilishop 4.3 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-105761 Dify: IDOR in AppMCPServer PUT Endpoint Allows Modification of Other Apps' MCP Servers — dify 7.1 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105755 vLLM: Flash late-interaction scoring caches query embeddings under a caller-controlled request id — cross-request integrity break and induced errors on `/score` and `/rerank` — vllm 4.2 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-91107 openSIS Classic 9.3 - Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) — openSIS-Classic 9.3 Critical 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105699 Langflow: Authenticated Cross-Project File Disclosure via Unscoped MCP Resource Handlers — langflow 7.1 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105698 Langflow: Cross-user flow access and vertex execution via deprecated /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices endpoints — langflow 5.4 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-97305 WordPress AI Chatbot for WordPress – Hyve Lite plugin <= 2.0.2 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — AI Chatbot for WordPress – Hyve Lite 6.9 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-97070 WordPress Cozy Blocks plugin <= 2.2.23 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — Cozy Blocks 6.9 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105637 Plane: Cross-Project Asset Hijacking via 'ProjectBulkAssetEndpoint' (sibling of CVE-2026-46558) — plane 9.6 Critical 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105633 Plane: Issue Attachment Ownership Hijacking via Missing `issue_id` Scope — plane 7.1 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105631 Plane: asset download endpoints scope file lookups to the workspace (not the project / published entity) → cross-project & unauthenticated private-file disclosure — plane 7.5 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-105629 Plane: Cross-Tenant Destructive IDOR: Estimate Point Deletion via Unscoped Primary Key Lookup — plane 7.1 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104975 Plane: Cross-tenant asset authorization bypass in Plane Spaces public-board endpoints — plane 7.1 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104971 Plane: Cross-Workspace Asset Duplication IDOR + WorkspaceFileAssetEndpoint and FileAssetEndpoint Missing Authorization — plane 8.5 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104969 Plane: Cross-Tenant Cycle Issue Hijack via IDOR — plane 6.5 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104967 Plane: Cross-workspace association destruction and issue mutation/read via unscoped queries in BulkDeleteIssuesEndpoint and SubIssuesEndpoint — plane 5.4 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104966 Plane: Cross-Workspace IDOR in Estimate and Comment Endpoints Allows Read, Modify, and Inject Across Workspaces — plane 8.7 High 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104965 Plane: Cross-Tenant Issue Relation Creation via IDOR — plane 5.4 Medium 2026-10-05
CVE-2026-104964 Plane: Cross-Workspace Project Modification via Unscoped Project Lookup — plane 6.8 Medium 2026-10-05

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) represent 2075 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.