Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) — Vulnerability Class 2041

2041 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-639 represents an authorization bypass weakness where systems fail to validate that a user is permitted to access a resource identified by a user-controlled key. Attackers typically exploit this by manipulating identifiers, such as changing a numeric user ID in a URL or API parameter, to retrieve or modify another user’s private data. This insecure direct object reference allows unauthorized access without requiring authentication bypasses. Developers prevent this vulnerability by implementing robust server-side authorization checks that verify the requesting user’s permissions against the requested resource, rather than trusting client-supplied identifiers. Additionally, using indirect references or opaque tokens instead of predictable, sequential keys can mitigate the risk of enumeration and unauthorized access attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Retrieval of a user record occurs in the system based on some key value that is under user control. The key would typically identify a user-related record stored in the system and would be used to lookup that record for presentation to the user. It is likely that an attacker would have to be an authenticated user in the system. However, the authorization process would not properly check the data access operation to ensure that the authenticated user performing the operation has sufficient entitlements to perform the requested data access, hence bypassing any other authorization checks present in the system. For example, attackers can look at places where user specific data is retrieved (e.g. search screens) and determine whether the key for the item being looked up is controllable externally. The key may be a hidden field in the HTML form field, might be passed as a URL parameter or as an unencrypted cookie variable, then in each of these cases it will be possible to tamper with the key value. One manifestation of this weakness is when a system uses sequential or otherwise easily-guessable session IDs that would allow one user to easily switch to another user's session and read/modify their data.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
Access control checks for specific user data or functionality can be bypassed.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Horizontal escalation of privilege is possible (one user can view/modify information of another user).
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Vertical escalation of privilege is possible if the user-controlled key is actually a flag that indicates administrator status, allowing the attacker to gain administrative access.
Mitigations (3)
Architecture and Design For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design, Implementation Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
Examples (1)
The following code uses a parameterized statement, which escapes metacharacters and prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities, to construct and execute a SQL query that searches for an invoice matching the specified identifier [1]. The identifier is selected from a list of all invoices associated with the current authenticated user.
... conn = new SqlConnection(_ConnectionString); conn.Open(); int16 id = System.Convert.ToInt16(invoiceID.Text); SqlCommand query = new SqlCommand( "SELECT * FROM invoices WHERE id = @id", conn); query.Parameters.AddWithValue("@id", id); SqlDataReader objReader = objCommand.ExecuteReader(); ...
Bad · C#
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-86174 Plane through 1.4.2 Arbitrary Comment Write via Public Deploy Board — plane 4.3 Medium 2026-09-05
CVE-2026-86113 BookWyrm through 0.9.1 Insecure Direct Object Reference in edit-readthrough Allows Tampering with Other Users' Reading Records — bookwyrm 6.5 Medium 2026-09-05
CVE-2026-86112 BookWyrm through 0.9.1 Missing Authorization on the Favorite and Unfavorite Endpoints — bookwyrm 5.4 Medium 2026-09-05
CVE-2026-86111 BookWyrm through 0.9.1 Insecure Direct Object Reference in EditStatus Exposes Followers-Only and Direct Statuses — bookwyrm 6.5 Medium 2026-09-05
CVE-2026-85638 jofpin trape user.py authorization — trape 7.3 High 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-61688 SolidInvoice allows cross-user access to API token request history via writable DataGrid LiveComponent props — SolidInvoice 6.5 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-17627 Langflow is affected by improper authorization due to missing access control on the voice-mode WebSocket endpoint — Langflow OSS 4.9 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85693 Chatbot UI Cross-User Private File Content Disclosure via Retrieval API — chatbot-ui 6.5 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85624 Blinko 1.8.7 Cross-User Private Note Disclosure via noteReferenceList — blinko 6.5 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85607 Blinko 1.8.7 Cross-User AI Conversation Read and Write via message tRPC Router — blinko 8.8 High 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85617 snipe-it before 8.6.3 Authorization Bypass via Bulk Delete — snipe-it 8.8 High 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85616 Snipe-IT before 8.6.2 Authorization Bypass via Checkout-Acceptance — snipe-it 8.5 High 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85615 Openpanel before 2.3.0 Cross-Tenant IDOR via report.getLayouts — openpanel 6.4 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85611 OpenPanel before 2.3.0 Cross-Tenant BOLA via report procedures — openpanel 6.4 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85594 Traefik v3.7.1 crossProviderNamespaces Bypass via Service Middleware — traefik 7.0 High 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85579 SiYuan before v3.8.2 Information Disclosure via undoState — siyuan 4.3 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-27432 WordPress WP Rentals theme < 3.16.0 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — WP Rentals 5.4 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85381 light0011 cms Chapter Controller ChapterController.class.php authorization — cms 5.3 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-85378 light0011 cms Chapter Controller ChapterController.class.php _initialize authorization — cms 7.3 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-69857 Azure Cosmos DB Spoofing Vulnerability — Azure Cosmos DB 8.5 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-83711 Microsoft Azure Active Directory B2C Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — Entra 10.0 Critical 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-85392 Peppermint through 0.5.5 Authorization Bypass on the User Logout Endpoint — peppermint 4.3 Medium 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-85389 Worklenz before 3.0.0 Authorization Bypass on Task-Scoped Endpoints — worklenz 6.5 Medium 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-85308 WordPress SureForms plugin <= 2.12.5 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — SureForms 5.3 Medium 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-84836 WordPress WC Ukraine Shipping plugin <= 1.22.3 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — WC Ukraine Shipping 7.1 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-84769 WordPress Business Directory plugin <= 6.4.26 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — Business Directory 6.5 Medium 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-75035 Rancher: ext.cattle.io/v1 Token store: cross-user token disclosure via label-selector scoping bypass — Rancher 7.7 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-75033 Rancher: Cross-Cluster Secret Leakage via Namespace projectId Annotation Spoofing — Rancher 7.7 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-71404 Rancher: Ownership-less ClusterRole overwrite via attacker-controlled cr-name annotation on GlobalRole — Rancher 8.7 High 2026-09-03
CVE-2026-71403 Rancher: Identity-field mutation in /v3/users allows account hijack via principal rebind — Rancher 6.1 Medium 2026-09-03

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) represent 2041 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.